I'm glad you said that first because I thought it looked pretty great, too. But the kids and the reddits these days mock EVERYTHING and I wasn't sure if I was missing something.
Re: Images (now possibly NSFW)
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2020 12:09 pm
by Johnnie
Oh no. That is by far one of the most mesmerizing sandwiches I've ever seen. There's a reason for all the upvotes and gilding on that subreddit.
Re: Images (now possibly NSFW)
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2020 10:45 am
by Pruitt
Re: Images (now possibly NSFW)
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2020 10:52 am
by mister d
Yeah, that sandwich did everything right. Any nitpicking (too toasted, too messy) is factually incorrect.
Re: Images (now possibly NSFW)
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2020 11:01 am
by P.D.X.
Haven't eaten red meat in a couple years and I'd shove my face in that.
Re: Images (now possibly NSFW)
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2020 11:03 am
by Johnny Carwash
P.D.X. wrote: ↑Thu Apr 23, 2020 11:01 am
Haven't eaten red meat in a couple years and I'd shove my face in that.
I'll let someone else do the ... thing.
Re: Images (now possibly NSFW)
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2020 11:29 am
by mister d
P.D.X. wrote: ↑Thu Apr 23, 2020 11:01 am
Haven't eaten red meat in a couple years and I'd shove my face in that.
15 months here. New swamp club???
Re: Images (now possibly NSFW)
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2020 12:53 pm
by Pruitt
P.D.X. wrote: ↑Thu Apr 23, 2020 11:01 am
...eat.. me... and... d...o my face.
Re: Images (now possibly NSFW)
Posted: Sun May 03, 2020 8:18 am
by Johnnie
May's contribution to the apocalypse. Murder Hornets.
Good luck and godspeed, Washington! They better not migrate south.
I just read about them.
If I were a religious type I'd wonder which of the biblical plagues is next.
Better not be boils.
I run away from yellow jackets like a 5 year old so these are going to be a gigantic nope for me. I'll leave the planet before I put up with these guys in any widespread manner.
Re: Images (now possibly NSFW)
Posted: Tue May 05, 2020 8:42 am
by mister d
A la J-Lo, if these become a thing, I wouldn't leave the house without a tennis racket.
Re: Images (now possibly NSFW)
Posted: Tue May 05, 2020 12:01 pm
by P.D.X.
I was hiking in Costa Rica when I saw what I thought was a hummingbird coming at me, although moving much too slowly. It turned out to be a giant wasp and I watched it as it landed and started inspecting these large holes in a mud bank. Did some research and it turned out to be a tarantula hawk — it hunts tarantulas, stuns them with a sting, and then lays its eggs in them. The larvae then eat the tarantula slowly from the inside out, methodically to keep it alive as long as possible. (not my pic)
Re: Images (now possibly NSFW)
Posted: Tue May 05, 2020 1:46 pm
by Jerloma
mister d wrote: ↑Tue May 05, 2020 8:42 am
A la J-Lo, if these become a thing, I wouldn't leave the house without a tennis racket.
I have a tennis racket bug zapper but those things would probably laugh at it.
Re: Images (now possibly NSFW)
Posted: Tue May 05, 2020 1:47 pm
by Johnnie
This crazy white person decided to sting himself with one.
Also, there appear to be YouTube videos of these things going after tarantulas.
Re: Images (now possibly NSFW)
Posted: Fri May 15, 2020 11:47 am
by wlu_lax6
Re: Images (now possibly NSFW)
Posted: Wed May 20, 2020 8:05 am
by Sabo
Johnnie wrote: ↑Sun May 03, 2020 8:18 am
May's contribution to the apocalypse. Murder Hornets.
Just the japanese ones. The pansy ass euro bees get eaten.
Re: Images (now possibly NSFW)
Posted: Sun May 24, 2020 3:05 pm
by sancarlos
Re: Images (now possibly NSFW)
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2020 11:35 am
by A_B
Scottie wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2014 1:56 pm
Did that come via Facebook or something? It's certainly dumb enough.
Merriam-Webster dictionary, http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/peruse" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; , first entry for "peruse": to look at or read (something) in an informal or relaxed way.
Nauseous, that thing says, means "to cause nausea". Never mind that "nauseous" is an adjective and not a verb. Ugh.
"Of great size" is perfectly acceptable usage of "enormity" and, I might add, infinitely more common that the archaic use "extreme evil".
Ridiculous list. Probably getting passed around by the millions. Besides, those are hardly the "top ten". The top ones are idiot variants of you're/your/your's/yours, irregardless, principle/principal, affect/effect, their/there/they're, lie/lay, "I could care less", foilage, expresso . . .
People who know enough English to use words such as compelled and refute tend to use them correctly.
TAKE A SUCK OF THAT.
Re: Images (now possibly NSFW)
Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2020 2:38 pm
by govmentchedda
Re: Images (now possibly NSFW)
Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2020 2:54 pm
by rass
scandalous!
Re: Images (now possibly NSFW)
Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2020 3:12 pm
by govmentchedda
Really wish there was video of this (assuming Prince was all slinky like on the skates).
Re: Images (now possibly NSFW)
Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2020 7:38 pm
by Johnnie
BATDANCE!
(Low-key, his Batman album was amazing. At least according to 7 year old me.)
Re: Images (now possibly NSFW)
Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2020 9:47 pm
by govmentchedda
Prince never released an album that didn't have at least two bangers.
(Low-key, his Batman album was amazing. At least according to 7 year old me.)
I watched that movie recently and it's still really good.
I'm not ragging on Prince, and I like that movie a lot. But, having said all that, I think the insertion of that song into the movie (on Joker's boom box) seemed an unnecessary, forced shoehorn into the movie.
(Low-key, his Batman album was amazing. At least according to 7 year old me.)
I watched that movie recently and it's still really good.
I'm not ragging on Prince, and I like that movie a lot. But, having said all that, I think the insertion of that song into the movie (on Joker's boom box) seemed an unnecessary, forced shoehorn into the movie.
"Batdance" isn't even in the movie. "Partyman" is the song played in the art museum scene with the boom box.
