Page 25 of 32
Re: Twitter
Posted: Fri Feb 21, 2020 10:25 am
by rass
Great, Snoopy went and got himself cancelled.
Re: Twitter
Posted: Fri Feb 21, 2020 6:55 pm
by DaveInSeattle
Re: Twitter
Posted: Fri Feb 21, 2020 8:43 pm
by Pruitt
No way!
Astounding
Re: Twitter
Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2020 8:22 am
by Johnnie
🤣
Re: Twitter
Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2020 3:46 pm
by Johnnie
My Twitter feed is wild sometimes. And I stopped following porn stars. (I mean, I keep them listed, but they aren't on the main feed.)
Re: Twitter
Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2020 4:12 pm
by brian
Technically in Thailand, it is considered a third gender.
Re: Twitter
Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2020 5:18 pm
by Pruitt
"Anal fisting thread?"
Re: Twitter
Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2020 9:42 pm
by The Sybian
Pruitt wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 5:18 pm
"Anal fisting thread?"
Well, he is running for President despite not being able to enter the US due to warrants. And he has to hang up the phone and call from another burner every 30 seconds so thy can't track his calls. I think the anal fisting and penchant for ladyboys is far down the list of things that will sink his bid.
Re: Twitter
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2020 2:41 pm
by The Sybian
Today, Brit Hume learned to check his open tabs before Tweeting a screenshot of his computer. (Middle tab is Sexy Vinyl Vixen)
Re: Twitter
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2020 3:14 pm
by mister d
If you go to that page now, Biden is up 24.5% in the last day. Trump is up 2% with him. I'm sure that's a good sign.
Re: Twitter
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2020 4:54 pm
by DaveInSeattle
mister d wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 3:14 pm
If you go to that page now, Biden is up 24.5% in the last day. Trump is up 2% with him. I'm sure that's a good sign.
What about Sexy Vixen Vinyl? What are the odds for that?
Re: Twitter
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2020 8:07 am
by Sabo
Re: Twitter
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2020 6:02 pm
by EdRomero
Re: Twitter
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2020 6:16 pm
by brian
I realize that's Dennis Miller's schtick, but what does that even mean? I'm legitimately not joking. Totally lost.
Re: Twitter
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2020 6:22 pm
by EdRomero
No idea but I'm guessing it's an attempt to make fun of millennial libs.
Re: Twitter
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2020 6:40 pm
by The Sybian
The response are hilarious. "Someone try unplugging and replugging in Dennis Miller." "I'm sure Dennis Miller was replaced with a random word generator."
It's interesting how many of the 1980s SNL cast member are Conservatives. Miller, Victoria Jackson, Sandler, Rob Schneider. Actually, that's all I got, but still, you don't see too many comedians being outspoken Conservatives. OTOH, Sandler is the only one you could say is funny or talented, and he isn't outspoken.
Re: Twitter
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2020 6:52 pm
by P.D.X.
Sounds like a pretentious aspiring writer. "Unctuous"? Doesn't even make sense there. But hey, it's an obscure word so maybe it will make me look smart!
Re: Twitter
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2020 7:26 pm
by Pruitt
P.D.X. wrote: ↑Fri Mar 20, 2020 6:52 pm
Sounds like a pretentious aspiring writer. "Unctuous"? Doesn't even make sense there. But hey, it's an obscure word so maybe it will make me look smart!
HATE that guy.
Look at all the references he managed to squeeze into a sentence that really makes no sense. It's like he's doing mad-lib "comedy."
Re: Twitter
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2020 7:36 pm
by Johnny Carwash
"The [X] that is [Y]" might be my least-favorite literary device. Hearing it wants me to kick that person in the gonads.
Re: Twitter
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2020 7:44 pm
by mister d
Pruitt wrote: ↑Fri Mar 20, 2020 7:26 pmHATE that guy.
Look at all the references he managed to squeeze into a sentence that really makes no sense. It's like he's doing mad-lib "comedy."
Uhhh ... look in a mirror, bro. MAD LIB indeed!!!
Re: Twitter
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2020 1:00 pm
by Shirley
Re: Twitter
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2020 2:36 pm
by sancarlos
That was great, Dave.
Re: Twitter
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2020 9:19 pm
by Shirley
sancarlos wrote: ↑Sun Mar 22, 2020 2:36 pm
That was great, Dave.
I've watched that several times and laughed out loud every time. It's a brilliant little video.
Re: Twitter
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2020 9:24 pm
by Johnny Carwash
Shirley wrote: ↑Sun Mar 22, 2020 9:19 pm
sancarlos wrote: ↑Sun Mar 22, 2020 2:36 pm
That was great, Dave.
I've watched that several times and laughed out loud every time. It's a brilliant little video.
It's definitely really funny, but the more I think about it, the more I'm mad at the tweeter for semi-spoiling it by adding his comment.
Re: Twitter
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2020 9:28 pm
by Shirley
Johnny Carwash wrote: ↑Sun Mar 22, 2020 9:24 pm
Shirley wrote: ↑Sun Mar 22, 2020 9:19 pm
sancarlos wrote: ↑Sun Mar 22, 2020 2:36 pm
That was great, Dave.
I've watched that several times and laughed out loud every time. It's a brilliant little video.
It's definitely really funny, but the more I think about it, the more I'm mad at the tweeter for semi-spoiling it by adding his comment.
agreed
Re: Twitter
Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 12:02 am
by DaveInSeattle
Read to the end...
Re: Twitter
Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 7:03 am
by Pruitt
That made my morning!
Re: Twitter
Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 8:40 am
by The Sybian
I love learning the weird history of ordinary things. And the link to this Onion article made it even better:
OAK RIDGE, TN—Snack physicists at Nabisco Labs announced Friday the first successful synthesis of a Quadriscuit cracker, a salty treat long postulated by the theoretical models of food scientists but never confirmed by experiment until now. “At the moment, this hyperwafer can only exist for six milliseconds in a precisely calibrated field of magnetic energy, positrons, roasted garlic, and beta particles,” lab chief Dr. Paul Ellison told reporters at a press conference outside Nabisco’s $200 million seven-whole-grain accelerator. “However, by bombarding the cracker with neutrons until it reaches critical levels of zestiness and crunchability, we believe we can one day develop a chemically stable and edible Quadriscuit. Needless to say, such an irresistibly tasty breakthrough could upend everything we thought we knew about snacking.” Ellison added that the snack’s existence cannot be explained by classical Fig Newtonian physics.
Re: Twitter
Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 12:41 pm
by DaveInSeattle
20 years ago:
Re: Twitter
Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 3:40 pm
by wlu_lax6
I was in Seattle for that.
Re: Twitter
Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 4:21 pm
by DaveInSeattle
wlu_lax6 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 26, 2020 3:40 pm
I was in Seattle for that.
It was LOUD! I was at least 10 miles away, watching on TV, and I was amazed how loud it was.
Re: Twitter
Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 4:32 pm
by mister d
1,631 days too late if you ask me.
Re: Twitter
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2020 1:44 pm
by brian
El Rey.
Re: Twitter
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2020 1:57 pm
by Johnny Carwash
I was expecting him to hit the guy walking behind him in the nuts with his backstroke and now I'm kind of disappointed.
Re: Twitter
Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2020 2:58 pm
by brian
I doubt this is legit, but if so...
Re: Twitter
Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2020 3:11 pm
by Johnny Carwash
Can you trade license plates with someone else? Because somewhere there is a 40-year-old guy that still wears his baseball cap backwards who would pay a mint for the rights to that.
Re: Twitter
Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2020 3:19 pm
by sancarlos
Fun with license plates (unintentional or intentional?)
Re: Twitter
Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2020 7:38 pm
by sancarlos
Re: Twitter
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2020 11:49 am
by Johnnie
Re: Twitter
Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2020 2:40 pm
by DaveInSeattle
Pretty fun thread here...trip down Onion headlines memory lane...