Let's assume Michigan loses. Then, do you think Oklahoma jumps Georgia? What if Georgia plays Alabama tight in the SEC title game?Joe K wrote: ↑Sat Nov 24, 2018 2:24 pmTheir offense hasn’t looked bad at all though, which is why I really thought OSU would win this game. I like Harbaugh a lot, but his teams are always slogging it out on offense. At least Oklahoma won last night and they just need to beat Texas to spare us OSU in the playoff.
College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
Moderators: Shirley, Sabo, brian, rass, DaveInSeattle
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
"What a bunch of pedantic pricks." - sybian
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
Georgia has to win to make the playoffs period. It’s pretty easy for committee if chalk wins. Alabama Clemson Notre Dame and Oklahoma.sancarlos wrote: ↑Sat Nov 24, 2018 2:40 pmLet's assume Michigan loses. Then, do you think Oklahoma jumps Georgia? What if Georgia plays Alabama tight in the SEC title game?Joe K wrote: ↑Sat Nov 24, 2018 2:24 pmTheir offense hasn’t looked bad at all though, which is why I really thought OSU would win this game. I like Harbaugh a lot, but his teams are always slogging it out on offense. At least Oklahoma won last night and they just need to beat Texas to spare us OSU in the playoff.
Bandwagon fan of the 2023 STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS!
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
I'm gonna net about $300 on this Ohio State game today and I still have an 8-team parlay working with a net of $225 if Syracuse beats BC. I'd have to go pretty far back in my app history to find a CFB game I've lost. I just wish I had been betting more.
ETA: I mean I got TOSU for -125 at halftime for $50 and that was best value I got in weeks. (Also had $100 TOSU pregame to win $170 and TOSU -$110 for + 4.5 points.
ETA: I mean I got TOSU for -125 at halftime for $50 and that was best value I got in weeks. (Also had $100 TOSU pregame to win $170 and TOSU -$110 for + 4.5 points.
Bandwagon fan of the 2023 STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS!
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
...Nonlinear FC wrote: ↑Mon Nov 19, 2018 9:51 am I don't understand a prediction where OSU "handles" Michigan easily. They just aren't that good this year. I think this game is going to look a lot like playing MSU, where things just stay kind of ugly for 3 Qs and one team makes plays at the end to win.
MI is vulnerable to slants, they are not vulnerable to screens (team speed on D is off the charts.) OSU's defense is terrible. Harbaugh and the staff have a bunch of stuff they've been able to keep off tape because they've rolled everyone other than MSU since NW 6 or 7 weeks ago.
MSU was a weird game and that's how I think this game will go down. But handle easily? I'll take that bet.
ETA: Didn’t want to make it seem like I was calling you out or anything but I agreed with Brian that the conventional wisdom was way off on this game. Other than the Nebraska game, OSU has been dominant at home this year and I thought it was crazy that Michigan was favored. Also, OSU is a team that plays down to its competition but generally gets up for big games.
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
Geez Michigan. Totally outclassed. Nonlinear reaching tennbengal levels of prediction.
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
MD QB escapes pocket and lets it fly downfield. Throw is behind big WR, who has to turn around and make the play. CB collapses the distance and is able to make a play on the ball as it hits the wideouts hands.
"The receiver's just got to make that catch there. Here the QB makes it outside and flings it out to him..."
Fucking horse shit. Had the QB thrown the ball out ahead of the WR, that was 6 points. Period.
I watch football like 8x a year and I saw this.
"The receiver's just got to make that catch there. Here the QB makes it outside and flings it out to him..."
Fucking horse shit. Had the QB thrown the ball out ahead of the WR, that was 6 points. Period.
I watch football like 8x a year and I saw this.
Noli Timere Messorem
- Nonlinear FC
- The Dude
- Posts: 10846
- Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 2:09 pm
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
First off, if you have a take, put it out there before the game. (I've done this before on here, so I'm not being serious.. totally. I'm not gonna get all riled up on a tangent.)
But, yeah, overall they just couldn't account for OSU's speed. Diced them up on crossing patterns all day. And Haskins deciding to finally run effectively. Oh, the other thing that won't get reported enough is how much of a HUGE leap the OSU defense made today. That's the best they've played all year and it's not even close.
Optimism from the UM side was heavily based on the fact that OSU's D has been garbage all year. They were the polar opposite today, which lead to a blow out.
Pretty bummed, obviously. That is a gut shot and MI Land is going to be gnashing teeth due to out-sized expectations going into this one.
But, yeah, overall they just couldn't account for OSU's speed. Diced them up on crossing patterns all day. And Haskins deciding to finally run effectively. Oh, the other thing that won't get reported enough is how much of a HUGE leap the OSU defense made today. That's the best they've played all year and it's not even close.
Optimism from the UM side was heavily based on the fact that OSU's D has been garbage all year. They were the polar opposite today, which lead to a blow out.
Pretty bummed, obviously. That is a gut shot and MI Land is going to be gnashing teeth due to out-sized expectations going into this one.
You can lead a horse to fish, but you can't fish out a horse.
-
- The Dude
- Posts: 12001
- Joined: Wed Apr 17, 2013 7:07 pm
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
You had one job, Michigan.
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
You might want to share some vitriol for Notre Dame it appears. But it will be amusing to see Alabama hang 80 on OSU.
Bandwagon fan of the 2023 STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS!
-
- The Dude
- Posts: 12001
- Joined: Wed Apr 17, 2013 7:07 pm
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
I was just trying to find a way to get Meyer out.
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
It’s OSU. He’d have to molest a kid. And even then half the fan base would make excuses for him.
Bandwagon fan of the 2023 STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS!
- DSafetyGuy
- The Dude
- Posts: 8778
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 12:29 pm
- Location: Behind the high school
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
Until he lost to Michigan.
“All I'm sayin' is, he comes near me, I'll put him in the wall.”
- A_B
- The Dude
- Posts: 23423
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:36 am
- Location: Getting them boards like a wolf in the chicken pen.
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
Well that never happens.DSafetyGuy wrote: ↑Sun Nov 25, 2018 8:16 pmUntil he lost to Michigan.
You know what you need? A lyrical sucker punch to the face.
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
Paul Johnson retiring at Georgia Tech. That might be the most fascinating FBS opening. With the HS talent in Georgia and really only having to recruit against Georgia for in-state talent, could be a job where the right guy turns it into a perennial Top 10 type team.
Bandwagon fan of the 2023 STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS!
- govmentchedda
- The Dude
- Posts: 12741
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 4:36 pm
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
If they decided to ease their academic standards. I may be wrong, but doesn't GT act a bit like Notre Dame, Northwestern, service acadamies, etc. with regard to academic admissions?brian wrote: ↑Wed Nov 28, 2018 2:12 pm Paul Johnson retiring at Georgia Tech. That might be the most fascinating FBS opening. With the HS talent in Georgia and really only having to recruit against Georgia for in-state talent, could be a job where the right guy turns it into a perennial Top 10 type team.
Until everything is less insane, I'm mixing weed with wine.
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
That's my understanding as well, but still seems like there's room for improvement there. I like Paul Johnson a lot, but the Triple Option isn't something that Power Five teams should be running, especially ones that sit in the most fertile recruiting territory in the country.govmentchedda wrote: ↑Wed Nov 28, 2018 3:03 pmIf they decided to ease their academic standards. I may be wrong, but doesn't GT act a bit like Notre Dame, Northwestern, service acadamies, etc. with regard to academic admissions?brian wrote: ↑Wed Nov 28, 2018 2:12 pm Paul Johnson retiring at Georgia Tech. That might be the most fascinating FBS opening. With the HS talent in Georgia and really only having to recruit against Georgia for in-state talent, could be a job where the right guy turns it into a perennial Top 10 type team.
(I personally have advocated the CMU consider switching to the Triple Option for a few reasons -- no one else in the MAC runs it making it harder to prepare for, it requires the kind of athletic but undersized OLs that Michigan high schools turn out in droves and it is a hedge against November weather in the midwest.)
Bandwagon fan of the 2023 STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS!
- A_B
- The Dude
- Posts: 23423
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:36 am
- Location: Getting them boards like a wolf in the chicken pen.
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
The triple option is great to watch a couple of times a year. Then after that I want to die.
You know what you need? A lyrical sucker punch to the face.
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
I would think that the triple option would put you at a disadvantage for recruiting elite skill-position players. Because if one have NFL aspirations, wouldn't a QB or WR rather go where they throw the ball a lot? (I know Georgia Tech did get Calvin Johnson and Demaryius Thomas anyway, but just sayin').
"What a bunch of pedantic pricks." - sybian
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
That was before Georgia Tech ran the Triple Option.sancarlos wrote: ↑Wed Nov 28, 2018 3:18 pm I would think that the triple option would put you at a disadvantage for recruiting elite skill-position players. Because if one have NFL aspirations, wouldn't a QB or WR rather go where they throw the ball a lot? (I know Georgia Tech did get Calvin Johnson and Demaryius Thomas anyway, but just sayin').
Bandwagon fan of the 2023 STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS!
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
It worked well for Jim Grobe when he coached Ohio in the late 1990s. He took that offense to Wake Forest and did well there, too.brian wrote: ↑Wed Nov 28, 2018 3:08 pm(I personally have advocated the CMU consider switching to the Triple Option for a few reasons -- no one else in the MAC runs it making it harder to prepare for, it requires the kind of athletic but undersized OLs that Michigan high schools turn out in droves and it is a hedge against November weather in the midwest.)
THERE’S NOTHING WRONG WITH GALA LUNCHEONS, LAD!
- Nonlinear FC
- The Dude
- Posts: 10846
- Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 2:09 pm
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
Quick aside, Notre Dame's academic restrictions aren't nearly as tough as Northwestern and Stanford. What screws them up is that they require players to carry a full class load, which is a bitch when they get to the middle of the season. Not saying academic restrictions aren't a thing for them, but they're more like MI in that it is a factor, but not usually insurmountable for most targets. I mean, obviously, they don't target kids where getting them on campus would be a waste because you know they can't hack it. That's just dumb for places like the ones mentioned here. There are only so many "easy" classes at places like this to hide kids who can't handle the material.
GT has tough admission standards and the classes are difficult. But, in general, they in that same realm, maybe a tiny step below NW and Stanford.
I do know that they recently made a commitment to more national recruiting by adding a bunch of staff to the mix. They are going after the private schools in DC, and the states of Ohio and North Carolina, places they've really never been recruiting before. (I'm forgetting another target area.. I read the article many months ago.)
GT has tough admission standards and the classes are difficult. But, in general, they in that same realm, maybe a tiny step below NW and Stanford.
I do know that they recently made a commitment to more national recruiting by adding a bunch of staff to the mix. They are going after the private schools in DC, and the states of Ohio and North Carolina, places they've really never been recruiting before. (I'm forgetting another target area.. I read the article many months ago.)
You can lead a horse to fish, but you can't fish out a horse.
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
so we arent gonna mention this Georgia-Bama game? the swamp is weird sometimes
MOTHERFUCKING 2017 WORLD SERIES CHAMPIONS!!!Gunpowder wrote:you transcend douchedom.
-
- The Dude
- Posts: 12001
- Joined: Wed Apr 17, 2013 7:07 pm
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
You’re probably right because everyone knows Bama is better than Oklahoma or Ohio State. But the Committee may be less inclined to take a second SEC team when they just played each other right before the playoff. For UGA this is definitely a de facto playoff game and maybe they’d treat it that way for Bama, too.tennbengal wrote: ↑Sat Dec 01, 2018 6:01 pmIt’s just kinda...meaningless. If alabama loses, they still make playoff, and Georgia is fourth team.
-
- The Dude
- Posts: 12001
- Joined: Wed Apr 17, 2013 7:07 pm
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
I can’t figure out any reasonable scenario where Alabama misses the playoff.
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
If you’re picking the four best teams, I agree. Losing to UGA in Atlanta is way more respectable than OU and OSU’s bad games. But if the Committee gets cute and wants to “value the Conference title games,” it could happen.tennbengal wrote: ↑Sat Dec 01, 2018 6:14 pm I can’t figure out any reasonable scenario where Alabama misses the playoff.
- degenerasian
- The Dude
- Posts: 12333
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:22 pm
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
What if Alabama gets smoked? They've looked awful so far.
Kung Fu movies are like porn. There's 1 on 1, then 2 on 1, then a group scene..
-
- The Dude
- Posts: 12001
- Joined: Wed Apr 17, 2013 7:07 pm
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
I guess. I would genuinely be stunned if they were left out. Didn’t they make it a year ago and they were not champs of the SEC?Joe K wrote: ↑Sat Dec 01, 2018 6:23 pmIf you’re picking the four best teams, I agree. Losing to UGA in Atlanta is way more respectable than OU and OSU’s bad games. But if the Committee gets cute and wants to “value the Conference title games,” it could happen.tennbengal wrote: ↑Sat Dec 01, 2018 6:14 pm I can’t figure out any reasonable scenario where Alabama misses the playoff.
- degenerasian
- The Dude
- Posts: 12333
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:22 pm
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
True. They didn't even win their division.tennbengal wrote: ↑Sat Dec 01, 2018 6:32 pmI guess. I would genuinely be stunned if they were left out. Didn’t they make it a year ago and they were not champs of the SEC?Joe K wrote: ↑Sat Dec 01, 2018 6:23 pmIf you’re picking the four best teams, I agree. Losing to UGA in Atlanta is way more respectable than OU and OSU’s bad games. But if the Committee gets cute and wants to “value the Conference title games,” it could happen.tennbengal wrote: ↑Sat Dec 01, 2018 6:14 pm I can’t figure out any reasonable scenario where Alabama misses the playoff.
Kung Fu movies are like porn. There's 1 on 1, then 2 on 1, then a group scene..
- A_B
- The Dude
- Posts: 23423
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:36 am
- Location: Getting them boards like a wolf in the chicken pen.
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
This is delicious theater.
You know what you need? A lyrical sucker punch to the face.
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
Nick Saban is actually the devil. No one will convince me otherwise.
- degenerasian
- The Dude
- Posts: 12333
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:22 pm
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
Committee has it easy now. Georgia blew it.
Kung Fu movies are like porn. There's 1 on 1, then 2 on 1, then a group scene..
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
Man it was sad watching everyone gush.over UGA last night during the post game trophy ceremony. The whistle blew and the lobbyist went to work to get them some of that playoff money.
-
- The Dude
- Posts: 12001
- Joined: Wed Apr 17, 2013 7:07 pm
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
The SEC getting in a two-loss Georgia team over one loss champs big 10 and big 12 might be what we need for a death blow to the four team playoff and spur the obvious expansion to eight teams, so I will root for that.
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
It’s obviously not going to happen but part of me thinks just give UCF the #4 seed. They haven’t lost a game in 2 years and then you’d have the only four undefeated FBS teams as the playoff participants. We were really close to OU and OSU getting second losses hung on them this regular season, in which case UCF to the playoff might’ve actually happened.
-
- The Dude
- Posts: 12001
- Joined: Wed Apr 17, 2013 7:07 pm
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
That would also be awesome because that scenario would definitely force expansion of the playoffs to eight teams.
- degenerasian
- The Dude
- Posts: 12333
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:22 pm
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
If they still had their QB then yes. But the committee will consider them uncompetitive now. This is what happens when the process is subjective.Joe K wrote: ↑Sun Dec 02, 2018 7:33 am It’s obviously not going to happen but part of me thinks just give UCF the #4 seed. They haven’t lost a game in 2 years and then you’d have the only four undefeated FBS teams as the playoff participants. We were really close to OU and OSU getting second losses hung on them this regular season, in which case UCF to the playoff might’ve actually happened.
Kung Fu movies are like porn. There's 1 on 1, then 2 on 1, then a group scene..
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
The backup played really well yesterday, to the point that Milton’s injury shouldn’t really affect their ranking. But I think they’ll finish #7 in the CFP rankings and go to the Fiesta Bowl. They’re very capable of beating whoever their opponent is (likely LSU, Florida or Penn St.).degenerasian wrote: ↑Sun Dec 02, 2018 10:21 amIf they still had their QB then yes. But the committee will consider them uncompetitive now. This is what happens when the process is subjective.Joe K wrote: ↑Sun Dec 02, 2018 7:33 am It’s obviously not going to happen but part of me thinks just give UCF the #4 seed. They haven’t lost a game in 2 years and then you’d have the only four undefeated FBS teams as the playoff participants. We were really close to OU and OSU getting second losses hung on them this regular season, in which case UCF to the playoff might’ve actually happened.
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
ESPN did a nice job trying to manufacture a debate with Ohio State and UGA but Oklahoma was the obvious choice based on how the Committee has always picked their 4 teams. They’ve never taken a 2-loss team and the quality of your loss clearly matters.
Re: College Football 2018 (non-meltdown thread)
This is why I can’t take college football seriously, and I question the sanity of those that do.Joe K wrote: ↑Sun Dec 02, 2018 7:33 am It’s obviously not going to happen but part of me thinks just give UCF the #4 seed. They haven’t lost a game in 2 years and then you’d have the only four undefeated FBS teams as the playoff participants. We were really close to OU and OSU getting second losses hung on them this regular season, in which case UCF to the playoff might’ve actually happened.
Noli Timere Messorem