Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Okay . . . let's try this again.

Moderators: Shirley, Sabo, brian, rass, DaveInSeattle

User avatar
EnochRoot
The Dude
Posts: 6192
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2015 6:18 pm

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by EnochRoot »

Joe K wrote: Fri Apr 19, 2019 10:13 am
Nonlinear FC wrote: Fri Apr 19, 2019 10:02 am And yet I can find an article in less than 5 minutes quoting a dozen legal experts that says you are wrong.

At what school are you a law professor?

Who the fuck cares what was predicted on this board, man? WHO. CARES.

You are thumping your chest when there are people that literally... this is their job... And they are saying you are wrong.

Fucking bizarre.
Yeah it’s really bizarre that I’d take offense to being called out repeatedly by Bengal, Giff and Enoch for three years — and now accused of being “severely disturbed.”

And I made exactly one factual statement in my post: that no Americans were indicted for conspiring with Russia. That’s a true statement that isn’t contradicted by anything those law professors said.

But carry on.
So you’re a troll? I mean, shut the-fuck up already. You’re not as smart as you try to come off, and you’re annoying.

But that is the definition, isn’t it.
Noli Timere Messorem
User avatar
EnochRoot
The Dude
Posts: 6192
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2015 6:18 pm

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by EnochRoot »

I almost edited my post.

But nah. You should read that. It’s just a message board, right?
Noli Timere Messorem
User avatar
Nonlinear FC
The Dude
Posts: 10744
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 2:09 pm

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by Nonlinear FC »

We're just not having an actual conversation. You are beating back personal stuff that has nothing to do with the facts.
You can lead a horse to fish, but you can't fish out a horse.
User avatar
EnochRoot
The Dude
Posts: 6192
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2015 6:18 pm

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by EnochRoot »

Nonlinear FC wrote: Fri Apr 19, 2019 10:37 am We're just not having an actual conversation. You are beating back personal stuff that has nothing to do with the facts.
Message received (and thank you), but he’s straight-up trolling.
Noli Timere Messorem
User avatar
Nonlinear FC
The Dude
Posts: 10744
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 2:09 pm

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by Nonlinear FC »

EnochRoot wrote: Fri Apr 19, 2019 10:39 am
Nonlinear FC wrote: Fri Apr 19, 2019 10:37 am We're just not having an actual conversation. You are beating back personal stuff that has nothing to do with the facts.
Message received (and thank you), but he’s straight-up trolling.
I mean, I was talking to Joe, but cool.

:-)

I'm not above being pissed off on this subject.
You can lead a horse to fish, but you can't fish out a horse.
User avatar
EnochRoot
The Dude
Posts: 6192
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2015 6:18 pm

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by EnochRoot »

Thanks for the clarification. Interesting that when things seem so torn and frayed where true colors emerge?

I mean, I guess I’m overall combative and generally annoying, but why would somebody gravitate towards *that* sort of behavior, unless that’s what he’s been feeding on for the past several years?
Noli Timere Messorem
Joe K
Walter Sobchak
Posts: 4754
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 4:37 pm

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by Joe K »

EnochRoot wrote: Fri Apr 19, 2019 10:51 am Thanks for the clarification. Interesting that when things seem so torn and frayed where true colors emerge?

I mean, I guess I’m overall combative and generally annoying, but why would somebody gravitate towards *that* sort of behavior, unless that’s what he’s been feeding on for the past several years?
Because I genuinely believe my posts on this issue. One can think that the various Trump-Russia conspiracy theories are unfounded and implausible without being a troll. The following things can all be true:

1. Trump is an awful person and an awful President.
2. Trump’s heavy-handed attempts to bully DOJ are abhorrent.
3. Trump did not conspire with Russia to win the election and, unfortunately, was legitimately elected.
User avatar
Square Rob
Jesus Quintana
Posts: 769
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:43 pm

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by Square Rob »

Joe K wrote: Fri Apr 19, 2019 11:00 am
EnochRoot wrote: Fri Apr 19, 2019 10:51 am Thanks for the clarification. Interesting that when things seem so torn and frayed where true colors emerge?

I mean, I guess I’m overall combative and generally annoying, but why would somebody gravitate towards *that* sort of behavior, unless that’s what he’s been feeding on for the past several years?
Because I genuinely believe my posts on this issue. One can think that the various Trump-Russia conspiracy theories are unfounded and implausible without being a troll. The following things can all be true:

1. Trump is an awful person and an awful President.
2. Trump’s heavy-handed attempts to bully DOJ are abhorrent.
3. Trump did not conspire with Russia to win the election and, unfortunately, was legitimately elected.
4. Even though there may have been no direct conspiracy, Trumps actions since have exceeded the normal threshold for obstruction of justice. Were he to hold any other office than president he would have since been indicted.
User avatar
Nonlinear FC
The Dude
Posts: 10744
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 2:09 pm

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by Nonlinear FC »

5. Even if you cede the point that Trump didn't personally conspire with Russia, it is indisputable that members of his campaign did. Providing polling data to help direct Russian efforts in certain swing states is very clearly conspiring with Russian operatives.
You can lead a horse to fish, but you can't fish out a horse.
User avatar
DaveInSeattle
The Dude
Posts: 8395
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 5:51 am
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by DaveInSeattle »

Joe K wrote: Fri Apr 19, 2019 11:00 am 3. Trump did not conspire with Russia to win the election and, unfortunately, was legitimately elected.
"If it’s what you say I love it especially later in the summer." - Trump Jr, when promised "dirt" on Hillary's campaign by Russian operatives.
User avatar
Jerloma
The Dude
Posts: 7050
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 2:10 pm

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by Jerloma »

6. Trump stood in front of the world and unambiguously stated that be believed Putin regarding Russian election interference over his intelligence agencies.

I mean what path can that possibly take you on that doesn't lead to collusion? He's just dumb?
And the unicorns shall come down with them, and the bullocks with the bulls; and their land shall be soaked with blood, and their dust made fat with fatness. - God
Joe K
Walter Sobchak
Posts: 4754
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 4:37 pm

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by Joe K »

Nonlinear FC wrote: Fri Apr 19, 2019 11:39 am 5. Even if you cede the point that Trump didn't personally conspire with Russia, it is indisputable that members of his campaign did. Providing polling data to help direct Russian efforts in certain swing states is very clearly conspiring with Russian operatives.
Mueller didn’t reach that conclusion (although he didn’t necessarily rule it out). He said it was unclear why Manafort shared the data and that he couldn’t establish it was part of an election conspiracy.

Here’s a Greenwald Tweet screenshotting this passage from the Mueller Report:
Joe K
Walter Sobchak
Posts: 4754
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 4:37 pm

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by Joe K »

Jerloma wrote: Fri Apr 19, 2019 11:58 am 6. Trump stood in front of the world and unambiguously stated that be believed Putin regarding Russian election interference over his intelligence agencies.

I mean what path can that possibly take you on that doesn't lead to collusion? He's just dumb?
Because he’s a mentally addled pathological liar who refuses to acknowledge any facts that dilute the “greatness” of his “victories”? How many times did he tell patently absurd lies about the size of his inauguration crowd or the historic margin in his Electoral College win?
User avatar
Brontoburglar
The Dude
Posts: 5851
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:20 am

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by Brontoburglar »

occam's razor seems applicable here when wondering if someone(s) seeking to interfere with the US electoral process would or would not have utilized shared polling data
"We're not the smartest people in the world. We go down the straightaway and turn left. That's literally what we do." -- Clint Bowyer
User avatar
Nonlinear FC
The Dude
Posts: 10744
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 2:09 pm

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by Nonlinear FC »

Yeah, sorry, Meuller is being RIDICULOUSLY conservative and cautious there. Gimme a fucking break with that.

There are dozens of people in the Trump campaign meeting with and passing information to Russians.

I'm really not going to debate this anymore. It's ridiculous.
You can lead a horse to fish, but you can't fish out a horse.
User avatar
DaveInSeattle
The Dude
Posts: 8395
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 5:51 am
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by DaveInSeattle »

Joe K wrote: Fri Apr 19, 2019 12:05 pm
Nonlinear FC wrote: Fri Apr 19, 2019 11:39 am 5. Even if you cede the point that Trump didn't personally conspire with Russia, it is indisputable that members of his campaign did. Providing polling data to help direct Russian efforts in certain swing states is very clearly conspiring with Russian operatives.
Mueller didn’t reach that conclusion (although he didn’t necessarily rule it out). He said it was unclear why Manafort shared the data and that he couldn’t establish it was part of an election conspiracy.

Here’s a Greenwald Tweet screenshotting this passage from the Mueller Report:
Can we get a Greenwald addendum to Godwin's law?
User avatar
Nonlinear FC
The Dude
Posts: 10744
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 2:09 pm

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by Nonlinear FC »

FFS, the sentence directly above explains why they couldn't reach a conclusion.

That's Fox News-level gas-lighting.
You can lead a horse to fish, but you can't fish out a horse.
Joe K
Walter Sobchak
Posts: 4754
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 4:37 pm

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by Joe K »

DaveInSeattle wrote: Fri Apr 19, 2019 12:32 pm
Joe K wrote: Fri Apr 19, 2019 12:05 pm
Nonlinear FC wrote: Fri Apr 19, 2019 11:39 am 5. Even if you cede the point that Trump didn't personally conspire with Russia, it is indisputable that members of his campaign did. Providing polling data to help direct Russian efforts in certain swing states is very clearly conspiring with Russian operatives.
Mueller didn’t reach that conclusion (although he didn’t necessarily rule it out). He said it was unclear why Manafort shared the data and that he couldn’t establish it was part of an election conspiracy.

Here’s a Greenwald Tweet screenshotting this passage from the Mueller Report:
Can we get a Greenwald addendum to Godwin's law?
Come on. I just posted the first Tweet I could find showing that specific language from the Mueller Report. Your or my thoughts on Greenwald have nothing to do with the fact that Mueller (whether out of an abundance of caution or not) declined to reach the conclusion that Nonlinear said was indisputable.
Joe K
Walter Sobchak
Posts: 4754
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 4:37 pm

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by Joe K »

Nonlinear FC wrote: Fri Apr 19, 2019 12:45 pm FFS, the sentence directly above explains why they couldn't reach a conclusion.

That's Fox News-level gas-lighting.
That’s exactly why I said in my post that Mueller “didn’t necessarily rule it out.”
User avatar
Nonlinear FC
The Dude
Posts: 10744
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 2:09 pm

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by Nonlinear FC »

You are engaging in Fox News-level gas-lighting Joe. You want to continue defending Barr?

Because I have about 200 legal scholars and political pundits up and down the spectrum who can tell you how full of shit you are.

I'm done. Have a weekend.
You can lead a horse to fish, but you can't fish out a horse.
User avatar
Steve of phpBB
The Dude
Posts: 8439
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:44 am
Location: Feeling gravity's pull

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by Steve of phpBB »

Joe K wrote: Thu Apr 18, 2019 8:45 pm
Steve of phpBB wrote: Thu Apr 18, 2019 4:53 pm But that is all the Mueller Report found no evidence of. You had Russia offering the Trump campaign illicit assistance, the campaign saying "I love it, especially later in the summer," and then the campaign formed strategies around it the Russians' assistance, fully exploited it, and then helped to cover it up, both before and after the election and before and after the inauguration. At no point did the campaign repudiate or report the foreign interference.

That's collusion, and that is what people like Adam Schiff have been talking about.
This is just one example of how the known facts have been sensationalized a bit to fit the preset narrative of a criminal conspiracy, which is made clear by the Mueller Report’s discussion of this meeting. Although the attendees at the Trump Tower meeting had some connections to the Russian government, which they played up to get the meeting, it’s never been shown that they were actually acting on behalf of the government. So it wasn’t “Russia” offering assistance but rather a handful of Russian citizens. Moreover, it’s not clear the assistance offered was “illicit.” They did not claim to have hacked or stolen documents from Clinton or the DNC. Rather, they (falsely) claimed to have Russian government records showing misconduct by the Clintons. Mueller specifically addressed whether seeking such information could be a campaign finance violation and concluded it likely was not. That’s why no one has been charged or will be charged in connection with the Trump Tower meeting. So if that’s the best evidence of “conclusion,” it’s not saying much.
Dude, just wow.

I don't know who specifically has said that Trump's dealings with the Russians were directly criminal. But they were definitely disloyal and a betrayal of Trump's duty to the United States. And the collusion wasn't just the Trump Tower meeting - it was primarily the DNC emails.

What the Trump Tower meeting accomplished was making it clear that the Russian government's illicit assistance (and of course it's illicit, the Russian government can't offer non-illicit election assistance) would be welcomed. It would not be repudiated. It would not be reported to the FBI. Manafort, Page, Papadopolous, Flynn would not be wearing a wire when they met with Russians.

So you end up with Russia stealing emails from the DNC and giving them to Wikileaks. Then you have Wikileaks putting them on a website, and Trump saying "Hey everyone, look at Wikileaks! And by the way, these hacks aren't being done by the Russians!" That is coordination. It is not a prosecutable crime because Mueller didn't obtain solid evidence of a "we'll do this if you do that" agreement, explicit or implicit. But in that situation, they didn't need to have an agreement, because both the Russians and the Trump campaign had the same goal - to get Trump into office regardless of any legal, moral, ethical, or fiduciary considerations.

The Mueller Report confirmed that the Trump campaign planned media and campaign strategies around the release of the DNC emails, so they and the Russians could both maximize the benefit of the Russian crimes.

And there is no way we can be sure that the email releases and Trump strategies around it (including relying on the media to keep the email releases in the public eye) didn't sway the election, since it was so close.
And his one problem is he didn’t go to Russia that night because he had extracurricular activities, and they froze to death.
User avatar
EnochRoot
The Dude
Posts: 6192
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2015 6:18 pm

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by EnochRoot »

Nonlinear FC wrote: Fri Apr 19, 2019 12:59 pm You are engaging in Fox News-level gas-lighting Joe. You want to continue defending Barr?

Because I have about 200 legal scholars and political pundits up and down the spectrum who can tell you how full of shit you are.

I'm done. Have a weekend.
Thank you. That’s what I meant to say. Trolling is a lazy definition.
Noli Timere Messorem
Johnnie
The Dude
Posts: 16735
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:31 pm
Location: TUCSON, BITCH!

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by Johnnie »

For the record, I like Joe K's POV because I always have this moment where I go "Am I in my own head too fucking much about this? Am I in a bubble and eating up shit for no other reason that I don't like this administration?"

It's sometimes yes, sometimes no. I just put myself in Trump's position. If everyone in my orbit is being arrested and doing illegal shit, how can I not be associated with it? I'm under scrutiny at all times if the Airmen I supervise do something dumb. This guy is my boss, ffs.

So, if counter to everything ever, ignorance is a defense in this instance and he's just an asshole with bad friends, then it's affluenza the presidency. Ok, dude is legitimately too stupid or dumb to know just how stupid or dumb he is at running the country. K.

HOWEVA, if the logic follows, he needs to be removed for being incontinent. Full stop. Racist geriatric grandpa tweeter in chief aside, he is literally not able to do the job if you're defending his lack of ability.

HOWEVA AGAIN, the team assembled to prove bad are operating under the auspice that they aren't allowed to do exactly that and cannot indict. They can lay out every fact and nuance, but they have to defer to Congress.

But yet, half of Congress is corrupt heathens on the same team as the incontinent president. So there's no wrongdoing from their point of view. He's our guy. Fuck you we won!

This whole thing sucks and fuck politics.
mister d wrote:Couldn't have pegged me better.
EnochRoot wrote:I mean, whatever. Johnnie's all hot cuz I ride him.
User avatar
L-Jam3
The Dude
Posts: 5949
Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 8:43 am

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by L-Jam3 »

I like your switching ”incontinent” for “incompetent”. If that was unintentional that’s even more impressive.
My avatar corresponds on my place in the Swamp posting list with the all-time Home Run list. Number 45 is Paul Konerko with 439.
User avatar
Square Rob
Jesus Quintana
Posts: 769
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:43 pm

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by Square Rob »

How much of the redacted stuff is Assange? My gut says ~25%.
User avatar
rass
The Dude
Posts: 20209
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 9:41 am
Location: N effin' J

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by rass »

L-Jam3 wrote: Fri Apr 19, 2019 2:16 pm I like your switching ”incontinent” for “incompetent”. If that was unintentional that’s even more impressive.
“Military sources are suggesting the pee tape is real!”
I felt aswirl with warm secretions.
Joe K
Walter Sobchak
Posts: 4754
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 4:37 pm

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by Joe K »

Square Rob wrote: Fri Apr 19, 2019 3:35 pm How much of the redacted stuff is Assange? My gut says ~25%.
I think a lot of it is Roger Stone, some of which may also relate to Wikileaks.
User avatar
Steve of phpBB
The Dude
Posts: 8439
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:44 am
Location: Feeling gravity's pull

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by Steve of phpBB »

Joe K wrote: Fri Apr 19, 2019 3:41 pm
Square Rob wrote: Fri Apr 19, 2019 3:35 pm How much of the redacted stuff is Assange? My gut says ~25%.
I think a lot of it is Roger Stone, some of which may also relate to Wikileaks.
Yeah, I think the "Harm to Ongoing Matters" redactions appear to be Stone.

Which is bullshit. The harm to the prosecution of Stone that comes from disclosure in the report can't come close to the harm from keeping that information from the American people.
And his one problem is he didn’t go to Russia that night because he had extracurricular activities, and they froze to death.
Johnnie
The Dude
Posts: 16735
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:31 pm
Location: TUCSON, BITCH!

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by Johnnie »





Noice.
mister d wrote:Couldn't have pegged me better.
EnochRoot wrote:I mean, whatever. Johnnie's all hot cuz I ride him.
Joe K
Walter Sobchak
Posts: 4754
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 4:37 pm

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by Joe K »

Johnnie wrote: Fri Apr 19, 2019 2:05 pmHOWEVA, if the logic follows, he needs to be removed for being incontinent. Full stop. Racist geriatric grandpa tweeter in chief aside, he is literally not able to do the job if you're defending his lack of ability.
For as much as I’ve disagreed with people in this thread I’ve gotta say this is spot on, including the use of the word “incontinent.” The pee tape is real, and it resulted in a purchase of gold-plated Depends. It’s crazy how everyone knows Trump has lost whatever mental acuity he may have once had and is now too spaced out to read a 2 page memo. If this were historical times (shoutout, Jerloma), some Rasputin-type would long since have taken advantage of the ruler’s frailty to seize the levers of power.
User avatar
Pruitt
The Dude
Posts: 18105
Joined: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:02 am
Location: North Shore of Lake Ontario

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by Pruitt »

Today's outrage:


US threatens to veto UN resolution on rape as weapon of war, officials say


Why?
Even after the formal monitoring mechanism was stripped from the resolution, the US was still threatening to veto the watered-down version, because it includes language on victims’ support from family planning clinics.
"beautiful, with an exotic-yet-familiar facial structure and an arresting gaze."
Joe K
Walter Sobchak
Posts: 4754
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 4:37 pm

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by Joe K »


It’s been good to see Democratic Presidential candidates finally wisen up and start criticizing Netanyahu.
User avatar
Pruitt
The Dude
Posts: 18105
Joined: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:02 am
Location: North Shore of Lake Ontario

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by Pruitt »

Joe K wrote: Tue Apr 23, 2019 12:55 pm
It’s been good to see Democratic Presidential candidates finally wisen up and start criticizing Netanyahu.
Looks like Bibi forgot the 2nd commandment.
"beautiful, with an exotic-yet-familiar facial structure and an arresting gaze."
Johnnie
The Dude
Posts: 16735
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:31 pm
Location: TUCSON, BITCH!

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by Johnnie »

"I'm gonna head to the Supreme Court if you try to impeach me" just encapsulates everything wrong about this timeline.

You can't do that, dumbfuck.
mister d wrote:Couldn't have pegged me better.
EnochRoot wrote:I mean, whatever. Johnnie's all hot cuz I ride him.
User avatar
A_B
The Dude
Posts: 23323
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:36 am
Location: Getting them boards like a wolf in the chicken pen.

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by A_B »

I'm no legal scholar, but I feel like "White House says it will fight subpoenas" is pretty blatant obstruction.
You know what you need? A lyrical sucker punch to the face.
User avatar
Nonlinear FC
The Dude
Posts: 10744
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 2:09 pm

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by Nonlinear FC »

Well, to be fair (which this batch doesn't deserve), they are coming at it under the "protection of the president/executive branch" which every president has done going back to the 50s and 60s.
You can lead a horse to fish, but you can't fish out a horse.
Johnnie
The Dude
Posts: 16735
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:31 pm
Location: TUCSON, BITCH!

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by Johnnie »

This guy and Kellyanne must have the awkwardest marriage.

mister d wrote:Couldn't have pegged me better.
EnochRoot wrote:I mean, whatever. Johnnie's all hot cuz I ride him.
User avatar
mister d
The Dude
Posts: 29048
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 8:15 am

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by mister d »

Mutual protection. Two people who believed at a core level couldn’t coexist.
Johnnie wrote: Sat Sep 10, 2022 8:13 pmOh shit, you just reminded me about toilet paper.
User avatar
The Sybian
The Dude
Posts: 18872
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:36 am
Location: Working in the Crap Part of Jersey

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by The Sybian »

I never thought Judge Napolitano would be the voice of reason reassuring me I'm not crazy.


An honest to God cult of personality - formed around a failed steak salesman.
-Pruitt
User avatar
Pruitt
The Dude
Posts: 18105
Joined: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:02 am
Location: North Shore of Lake Ontario

Re: Trump Admin Meltdown Thread Part III - A Democratic House

Post by Pruitt »

The Sybian wrote: Fri Apr 26, 2019 11:17 am I never thought Judge Napolitano would be the voice of reason reassuring me I'm not crazy.


That is scathing. Wow.
"beautiful, with an exotic-yet-familiar facial structure and an arresting gaze."
Post Reply