Death to the NCAA

Okay . . . let's try this again.

Moderators: Shirley, Sabo, brian, rass, DaveInSeattle

User avatar
A_B
The Dude
Posts: 23319
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:36 am
Location: Getting them boards like a wolf in the chicken pen.

Death to the NCAA

Post by A_B »

I stole Deadspin's tag, and since this spans sports, new thread!

Anyway, Coach K is in on letting kids get paid for names and images licensing. I anticipate NC will have a bill passed by end of week.

Wonder how Lord Emmert is going to feel about likely his most recognizable name standding on the other side of the issue?
You know what you need? A lyrical sucker punch to the face.
User avatar
brian
The Dude
Posts: 27740
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 10:52 am
Location: Downtown Las Vegas

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by brian »

A_B wrote: Tue Oct 08, 2019 9:56 am I stole Deadspin's tag, and since this spans sports, new thread!

Anyway, Coach K is in on letting kids get paid for names and images licensing. I anticipate NC will have a bill passed by end of week.

Wonder how Lord Emmert is going to feel about likely his most recognizable name standding on the other side of the issue?
Self-interest more than anything or else he was going to lose every elite recruit to a school in California, but better late than never.
Bandwagon fan of the 2023 STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS!
User avatar
A_B
The Dude
Posts: 23319
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:36 am
Location: Getting them boards like a wolf in the chicken pen.

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by A_B »

Absolutely, and Coach Cal has said some things about this before as well, but Coach K is generally unassailable in the NCAA's eyes, so this really puts them in a weird spot.
You know what you need? A lyrical sucker punch to the face.
User avatar
L-Jam3
The Dude
Posts: 5949
Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 8:43 am

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by L-Jam3 »

Mark Few, who apparently coaches Gonzaga pro bono, is not pleased with Gavin Newsom's grandstanding.










Oh wait. Mark Few is paid? How much? More than $1.7 million a year? Your thoughts, DiS?
My avatar corresponds on my place in the Swamp posting list with the all-time Home Run list. Number 45 is Paul Konerko with 439.
User avatar
Rex
The Dude
Posts: 7264
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 3:10 pm

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by Rex »

This is kind of like Walter Cronkite on Vietnam. I don't think Coach K is being ideological at all, he's a realist. And I think he's figured out over the last couple of years who is ultimately going to win on this issue and his comments have gradually moved towards what he's saying today.
User avatar
mister d
The Dude
Posts: 29047
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 8:15 am

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by mister d »

Every coach that relies on one-and-dones, the only kids who will really be profiting here, is going to have to lobby this side or end up fucked.
Johnnie wrote: Sat Sep 10, 2022 8:13 pmOh shit, you just reminded me about toilet paper.
User avatar
A_B
The Dude
Posts: 23319
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:36 am
Location: Getting them boards like a wolf in the chicken pen.

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by A_B »

Rex wrote: Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:16 am This is kind of like Walter Cronkite on Vietnam. I don't think Coach K is being ideological at all, he's a realist. And I think he's figured out over the last couple of years who is ultimately going to win on this issue and his comments have gradually moved towards what he's saying today.
YES! That's the point that Jay Bilas has been making for a while. Just move on it, do something proactive for once. Don't stick your head in the sand and play the litigation game.
You know what you need? A lyrical sucker punch to the face.
User avatar
mister d
The Dude
Posts: 29047
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 8:15 am

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by mister d »

(I should say "only kids who will be profiting" at first. I imagine the new norm would be 3 star recruits getting local car dealership ad spots to commit and other kinda funny and ultimately positive things like that.)
Johnnie wrote: Sat Sep 10, 2022 8:13 pmOh shit, you just reminded me about toilet paper.
User avatar
A_B
The Dude
Posts: 23319
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:36 am
Location: Getting them boards like a wolf in the chicken pen.

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by A_B »

mister d wrote: Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:18 am Every coach that relies on one-and-dones, the only kids who will really be profiting here, is going to have to lobby this side or end up fucked.
You see, I don't think this will be the case at all. I think there will be a case for a lot of kids to be able to make a little bit of money doing ads for their hometown car dealer or sports shop or what have you. In my high school, we had one guy who went to UK to play football. He was a local celebrity, everyone knew who he was, and I'd guarantee you he'd be at the car lot signing autographs and on a billboard.

Now, he flamed out because he couldn't hack the academics, but I'm just saying I think there will be more opportunities than for just the top guys. Not national deals by any means, but regional ads are totally in play.
You know what you need? A lyrical sucker punch to the face.
User avatar
A_B
The Dude
Posts: 23319
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:36 am
Location: Getting them boards like a wolf in the chicken pen.

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by A_B »

mister d wrote: Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:20 am (I should say "only kids who will be profiting" at first. I imagine the new norm would be 3 star recruits getting local car dealership ad spots to commit and other kinda funny and ultimately positive things like that.)
YUP!
You know what you need? A lyrical sucker punch to the face.
User avatar
brian
The Dude
Posts: 27740
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 10:52 am
Location: Downtown Las Vegas

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by brian »

mister d wrote: Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:20 am (I should say "only kids who will be profiting" at first. I imagine the new norm would be 3 star recruits getting local car dealership ad spots to commit and other kinda funny and ultimately positive things like that.)
Oh, the sponsorship stuff at the MAC and Sun Belt level is gonna be the really awesome shit. I'm so ready for that. Can you imagine Antonio Brown shilling for the local Buffalo Wild Wings in Mount Pleasant in 2009?
Bandwagon fan of the 2023 STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS!
User avatar
A_B
The Dude
Posts: 23319
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:36 am
Location: Getting them boards like a wolf in the chicken pen.

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by A_B »

I'm thinking Fun ads a la the Spurs HEB series would be pretty popular.
You know what you need? A lyrical sucker punch to the face.
User avatar
Nonlinear FC
The Dude
Posts: 10740
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 2:09 pm

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by Nonlinear FC »

Anyone familiar with the CA legislation? Does it provide an actual framework to carry this off, or just open it up as a possibility. I've been all for paying the players for a looooong time, but it really gets bogged down in the details.

Are there going to be Title IX issues? What type of money are we talking here (is there a cap of some sort?) What type of review process is in place -- IOW, who regulates what type of usage is going to be in place?
You can lead a horse to fish, but you can't fish out a horse.
User avatar
A_B
The Dude
Posts: 23319
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:36 am
Location: Getting them boards like a wolf in the chicken pen.

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by A_B »

Nonlinear FC wrote: Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:43 am Anyone familiar with the CA legislation? Does it provide an actual framework to carry this off, or just open it up as a possibility. I've been all for paying the players for a looooong time, but it really gets bogged down in the details.

Are there going to be Title IX issues? What type of money are we talking here (is there a cap of some sort?) What type of review process is in place -- IOW, who regulates what type of usage is going to be in place?
From the stuff I have read, it's not a Title IX issue because the colleges aren't going to be the ones paying anyone. It's just that the kids will have the chance to earn money from outside entities through licensing their name and likeness or signing autographs for a fee. So the schools with legit stars in other sports ( a lot of them Olympic in nature) will be able to profit as well.

Here at UK, there's been a dirty little industry spearheaded by the Late Jared Lorenzen that makes T-shirts that are obviously related to a player at the school (SNell Yeah, Fear the Brow, I'm a Bucket) but which the kids they are alluding to get nothing from. Now they can monetize that.
You know what you need? A lyrical sucker punch to the face.
User avatar
sancarlos
The Dude
Posts: 18060
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:46 pm
Location: NorCal via Colorado

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by sancarlos »

Have you noticed a straw man in many of the arguments against the California law? People rail long and loud that you shouldn't pay players. But, as noted above, the law doesn't allow for paying players. It allows for letting kids get paid for names and images licensing, which is of course, different.
"What a bunch of pedantic pricks." - sybian
User avatar
Nonlinear FC
The Dude
Posts: 10740
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 2:09 pm

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by Nonlinear FC »

A_B wrote: Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:45 am
Nonlinear FC wrote: Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:43 am Anyone familiar with the CA legislation? Does it provide an actual framework to carry this off, or just open it up as a possibility. I've been all for paying the players for a looooong time, but it really gets bogged down in the details.

Are there going to be Title IX issues? What type of money are we talking here (is there a cap of some sort?) What type of review process is in place -- IOW, who regulates what type of usage is going to be in place?
From the stuff I have read, it's not a Title IX issue because the colleges aren't going to be the ones paying anyone. It's just that the kids will have the chance to earn money from outside entities through licensing their name and likeness or signing autographs for a fee. So the schools with legit stars in other sports ( a lot of them Olympic in nature) will be able to profit as well.

Here at UK, there's been a dirty little industry spearheaded by the Late Jared Lorenzen that makes T-shirts that are obviously related to a player at the school (SNell Yeah, Fear the Brow, I'm a Bucket) but which the kids they are alluding to get nothing from. Now they can monetize that.

Again, I am coming from a place of "Fuck yeah, they should get compensated." But, there's got to be SOME oversight here, or shit will go sideways very quickly.

You've got the prospect of a college player being on a billboard promoting a casino and/or a strip club, for example. You've got some kid getting $25k for an autograph signing at a car dealership owned by a booster. Etc etc and so on.
You can lead a horse to fish, but you can't fish out a horse.
User avatar
brian
The Dude
Posts: 27740
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 10:52 am
Location: Downtown Las Vegas

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by brian »

Nonlinear FC wrote: Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:57 am
A_B wrote: Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:45 am
Nonlinear FC wrote: Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:43 am Anyone familiar with the CA legislation? Does it provide an actual framework to carry this off, or just open it up as a possibility. I've been all for paying the players for a looooong time, but it really gets bogged down in the details.

Are there going to be Title IX issues? What type of money are we talking here (is there a cap of some sort?) What type of review process is in place -- IOW, who regulates what type of usage is going to be in place?
From the stuff I have read, it's not a Title IX issue because the colleges aren't going to be the ones paying anyone. It's just that the kids will have the chance to earn money from outside entities through licensing their name and likeness or signing autographs for a fee. So the schools with legit stars in other sports ( a lot of them Olympic in nature) will be able to profit as well.

Here at UK, there's been a dirty little industry spearheaded by the Late Jared Lorenzen that makes T-shirts that are obviously related to a player at the school (SNell Yeah, Fear the Brow, I'm a Bucket) but which the kids they are alluding to get nothing from. Now they can monetize that.

Again, I am coming from a place of "Fuck yeah, they should get compensated." But, there's got to be SOME oversight here, or shit will go sideways very quickly.

You've got the prospect of a college player being on a billboard promoting a casino and/or a strip club, for example. You've got some kid getting $25k for an autograph signing at a car dealership owned by a booster. Etc etc and so on.
They're getting that now, but at least now they'll have to sign the autographs to get it.

ETA: As well as a contract, maybe more importantly. There's going to be a paper trail now to differentiate between players getting cash for something and players getting cash for nothing.
Bandwagon fan of the 2023 STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS!
User avatar
mister d
The Dude
Posts: 29047
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 8:15 am

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by mister d »

Nonlinear FC wrote: Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:57 amAgain, I am coming from a place of "Fuck yeah, they should get compensated." But, there's got to be SOME oversight here, or shit will go sideways very quickly.

You've got the prospect of a college player being on a billboard promoting a casino and/or a strip club, for example. You've got some kid getting $25k for an autograph signing at a car dealership owned by a booster. Etc etc and so on.
I'm not seeing the sideways here.
Johnnie wrote: Sat Sep 10, 2022 8:13 pmOh shit, you just reminded me about toilet paper.
User avatar
GoodKarma
The Big Lebowski
Posts: 1508
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 12:14 pm
Location: Colorado

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by GoodKarma »

A_B wrote: Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:45 am
Nonlinear FC wrote: Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:43 am Anyone familiar with the CA legislation? Does it provide an actual framework to carry this off, or just open it up as a possibility. I've been all for paying the players for a looooong time, but it really gets bogged down in the details.

Are there going to be Title IX issues? What type of money are we talking here (is there a cap of some sort?) What type of review process is in place -- IOW, who regulates what type of usage is going to be in place?
From the stuff I have read, it's not a Title IX issue because the colleges aren't going to be the ones paying anyone. It's just that the kids will have the chance to earn money from outside entities through licensing their name and likeness or signing autographs for a fee. So the schools with legit stars in other sports ( a lot of them Olympic in nature) will be able to profit as well.

Here at UK, there's been a dirty little industry spearheaded by the Late Jared Lorenzen that makes T-shirts that are obviously related to a player at the school (SNell Yeah, Fear the Brow, I'm a Bucket) but which the kids they are alluding to get nothing from. Now they can monetize that.
I just wonder how it will apply to schools selling shirts or jerseys with a specific player number on it (I can't think of a time I've seen a school sell a jersey with a name on it). So if USC sells a jersey with #18 on it can JT Daniels lay claim to a cut of profits?
I would like expensive whiskey.
We only have beer & wine...
What am I, 12?
User avatar
Nonlinear FC
The Dude
Posts: 10740
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 2:09 pm

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by Nonlinear FC »

mister d wrote: Tue Oct 08, 2019 11:41 am
Nonlinear FC wrote: Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:57 amAgain, I am coming from a place of "Fuck yeah, they should get compensated." But, there's got to be SOME oversight here, or shit will go sideways very quickly.

You've got the prospect of a college player being on a billboard promoting a casino and/or a strip club, for example. You've got some kid getting $25k for an autograph signing at a car dealership owned by a booster. Etc etc and so on.
I'm not seeing the sideways here.
Not really sure what else to say. Universities are stuffy, extremely conservative entities. It's one thing to say "pay the players for their name and likeness," it's a completely different animal when those names and likenesses are used to promote, say a bar where that player (and his college compatriots) aren't legally allowed to frequent.

I, personally, don't give a shit. But I'm also not the president of UCLA or whatever.
You can lead a horse to fish, but you can't fish out a horse.
User avatar
A_B
The Dude
Posts: 23319
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:36 am
Location: Getting them boards like a wolf in the chicken pen.

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by A_B »

GoodKarma wrote: Tue Oct 08, 2019 11:49 am
A_B wrote: Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:45 am
Nonlinear FC wrote: Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:43 am Anyone familiar with the CA legislation? Does it provide an actual framework to carry this off, or just open it up as a possibility. I've been all for paying the players for a looooong time, but it really gets bogged down in the details.

Are there going to be Title IX issues? What type of money are we talking here (is there a cap of some sort?) What type of review process is in place -- IOW, who regulates what type of usage is going to be in place?
From the stuff I have read, it's not a Title IX issue because the colleges aren't going to be the ones paying anyone. It's just that the kids will have the chance to earn money from outside entities through licensing their name and likeness or signing autographs for a fee. So the schools with legit stars in other sports ( a lot of them Olympic in nature) will be able to profit as well.

Here at UK, there's been a dirty little industry spearheaded by the Late Jared Lorenzen that makes T-shirts that are obviously related to a player at the school (SNell Yeah, Fear the Brow, I'm a Bucket) but which the kids they are alluding to get nothing from. Now they can monetize that.
I just wonder how it will apply to schools selling shirts or jerseys with a specific player number on it (I can't think of a time I've seen a school sell a jersey with a name on it). So if USC sells a jersey with #18 on it can JT Daniels lay claim to a cut of profits?
That to me is one of the trickiest parts of it all, IMO. I remember when Tim Couch was at UK, there were #2 jerseys all over, but of course they didn't have the name Couch on them. A co-worker wanted to get a personalized jersey of a guy who shared her last name, but the system wouldn't let you use current player names on the jersey even though you could get the numbers of the player. A personalized had to be not a current player's name.
You know what you need? A lyrical sucker punch to the face.
User avatar
Rush2112
The Dude
Posts: 7276
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 4:35 pm
Location: Cyrus X-1
Contact:

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by Rush2112 »

A_B wrote: Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:45 am Here at UK, there's been a dirty little industry spearheaded by the Late Jared Lorenzen that makes T-shirts that are obviously related to a player at the school (SNell Yeah, Fear the Brow, I'm a Bucket) but which the kids they are alluding to get nothing from. Now they can monetize that.
I just saw a kid with a CU Basketball shirt with a slick nickname most likely sold at the bookstore, so it's not just for universities with relevant sports teams!
Did you see that ludicrous display last night?
User avatar
Shirley
The Dude
Posts: 7516
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 2:32 pm

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by Shirley »

A_B wrote: Tue Oct 08, 2019 9:56 am Anyway, Coach K is in on letting kids get paid for names and images licensing. I anticipate NC will have a bill passed by end of week.
Coach K may not have the sway in NC government that you think. Not a lot of Dukies in state office. But, I expect Ol' Roy will join in before long and that will have a lot of impact. Plus, I'm sure there are a hell of a lot of local businesses who'd love to start using local athletes in their ads.
Totally Kafkaesque
User avatar
GoodKarma
The Big Lebowski
Posts: 1508
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 12:14 pm
Location: Colorado

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by GoodKarma »

A_B wrote: Tue Oct 08, 2019 11:53 am
GoodKarma wrote: Tue Oct 08, 2019 11:49 am
A_B wrote: Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:45 am
Nonlinear FC wrote: Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:43 am Anyone familiar with the CA legislation? Does it provide an actual framework to carry this off, or just open it up as a possibility. I've been all for paying the players for a looooong time, but it really gets bogged down in the details.

Are there going to be Title IX issues? What type of money are we talking here (is there a cap of some sort?) What type of review process is in place -- IOW, who regulates what type of usage is going to be in place?
From the stuff I have read, it's not a Title IX issue because the colleges aren't going to be the ones paying anyone. It's just that the kids will have the chance to earn money from outside entities through licensing their name and likeness or signing autographs for a fee. So the schools with legit stars in other sports ( a lot of them Olympic in nature) will be able to profit as well.

Here at UK, there's been a dirty little industry spearheaded by the Late Jared Lorenzen that makes T-shirts that are obviously related to a player at the school (SNell Yeah, Fear the Brow, I'm a Bucket) but which the kids they are alluding to get nothing from. Now they can monetize that.
I just wonder how it will apply to schools selling shirts or jerseys with a specific player number on it (I can't think of a time I've seen a school sell a jersey with a name on it). So if USC sells a jersey with #18 on it can JT Daniels lay claim to a cut of profits?
That to me is one of the trickiest parts of it all, IMO. I remember when Tim Couch was at UK, there were #2 jerseys all over, but of course they didn't have the name Couch on them. A co-worker wanted to get a personalized jersey of a guy who shared her last name, but the system wouldn't let you use current player names on the jersey even though you could get the numbers of the player. A personalized had to be not a current player's name.
I'm sure the intent is for a kid not to profit from that but I can make a legal argument that a jersey number should be considered a likeness...I can easily see a kid pushing this issue.
I would like expensive whiskey.
We only have beer & wine...
What am I, 12?
User avatar
A_B
The Dude
Posts: 23319
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:36 am
Location: Getting them boards like a wolf in the chicken pen.

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by A_B »

Yeah I don't really follow NC state politics, just figured if Coach K is on board then the rest of the coaches will probably fall in line.
You know what you need? A lyrical sucker punch to the face.
User avatar
Nonlinear FC
The Dude
Posts: 10740
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 2:09 pm

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by Nonlinear FC »

I think a university selling a jersey number and not paying a player would get shot down by the AD (via whatever head coach is involved.)

Think about the optics and internal politics of doing that.

I mean, they could TRY to pull that off, but as you guys are saying it will immediately be challenged and the PR on that is going to HAMMER that school to death.
You can lead a horse to fish, but you can't fish out a horse.
HaulCitgo
Walter Sobchak
Posts: 4444
Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:07 pm

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by HaulCitgo »

mister d wrote: Tue Oct 08, 2019 11:41 am
Nonlinear FC wrote: Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:57 amAgain, I am coming from a place of "Fuck yeah, they should get compensated." But, there's got to be SOME oversight here, or shit will go sideways very quickly.

You've got the prospect of a college player being on a billboard promoting a casino and/or a strip club, for example. You've got some kid getting $25k for an autograph signing at a car dealership owned by a booster. Etc etc and so on.
I'm not seeing the sideways here.
I want in. Very definitely a back door to funnel cash to recruits but that's ok. Low teens of real endorsement deal cash. The rest will be boosters paying to bring in freshmen. Thinking it might be better to swindle the rest of the kids versus trying to get in on the back door. For only $3500 I will peddle your bench sitting can't cover a lick ass to lawyers selling car wrecks around Atlanta?
User avatar
Pruitt
The Dude
Posts: 18105
Joined: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:02 am
Location: North Shore of Lake Ontario

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by Pruitt »

Funny joke on "Wait, Wait Don't Tell Me" this week relating to this issue.

"Get ready for your 2023 national champion - the Bakersfield School of Cosmetology."
"beautiful, with an exotic-yet-familiar facial structure and an arresting gaze."
User avatar
DSafetyGuy
The Dude
Posts: 8728
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 12:29 pm
Location: Behind the high school

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by DSafetyGuy »

Rex wrote: Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:16 am This is kind of like Walter Cronkite on Vietnam. I don't think Coach K is being ideological at all, he's a realist. And I think he's figured out over the last couple of years who is ultimately going to win on this issue and his comments have gradually moved towards what he's saying today.
As evidenced by his 180 on one-and-dones.

Not backing this is going to put you at a competitive disadvantage, so everyone's going to start falling line right quick.
“All I'm sayin' is, he comes near me, I'll put him in the wall.”
User avatar
A_B
The Dude
Posts: 23319
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:36 am
Location: Getting them boards like a wolf in the chicken pen.

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by A_B »

Today's the day and it's pretty cool to see so many kids already announcing deals. And it isn't just stars at power 5 schools. The ones with already successful social media seem to be out in the front.

Here's a rundown of it.

"Hanna and Haley Cavinder waited for only a few minutes after the clock struck midnight before taking advantage of the new opportunities for college athletes to cash in on their fame.

The twin sisters, who play for Fresno State's basketball team and entertain millions of followers on social media, flew to New York on Wednesday to sign their first major endorsement deal. They are now spokeswomen for Boost Mobile with plans to promote the wireless telecommunications company in a variety of ways in the coming year. NCAA rules changes and state laws that went into effect July 1 opened the door for college athletes to sell the rights to their names, images and likenesses for the first time."


I'd say most people of our ilk have not heard of these young ladies, but they have massive instagram followings.
You know what you need? A lyrical sucker punch to the face.
User avatar
rass
The Dude
Posts: 20209
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 9:41 am
Location: N effin' J

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by rass »

My HS freshman (sophomore in the fall) was excited to tell me that she's pretty sure she's now free to monetize her YT page if she can just get enough subscribers...

ETA: I have no idea how this actually affects HS kids and their future college eligibility not to mention their current HS availability so I helpfully said "don't do that".
I felt aswirl with warm secretions.
User avatar
mister d
The Dude
Posts: 29047
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 8:15 am

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by mister d »

My guess is one (1) person here knew who they were before today.
Johnnie wrote: Sat Sep 10, 2022 8:13 pmOh shit, you just reminded me about toilet paper.
User avatar
rass
The Dude
Posts: 20209
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 9:41 am
Location: N effin' J

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by rass »

Father of a current/recent student, perv, or both?
I felt aswirl with warm secretions.
User avatar
brian
The Dude
Posts: 27740
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 10:52 am
Location: Downtown Las Vegas

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by brian »

rass wrote: Thu Jul 01, 2021 4:19 pm Father of a current/recent student, perv, or both?
If it's who I think it is, closer to the latter but still not really accurate.
Bandwagon fan of the 2023 STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS!
User avatar
Rex
The Dude
Posts: 7264
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 3:10 pm

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by Rex »

An interesting postscript to the original post (and not pervy, unless your tastes are unconventional). Duke put this out today:

HaulCitgo
Walter Sobchak
Posts: 4444
Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:07 pm

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by HaulCitgo »

But u have to go to dook! No thanks. Women up 15-501 have more substance and way sexier. 💯
Johnnie
The Dude
Posts: 16730
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:31 pm
Location: TUCSON, BITCH!

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by Johnnie »

mister d wrote:Couldn't have pegged me better.
EnochRoot wrote:I mean, whatever. Johnnie's all hot cuz I ride him.
User avatar
govmentchedda
The Dude
Posts: 12672
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 4:36 pm

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by govmentchedda »

Fuck barstool.
Until everything is less insane, I'm mixing weed with wine.
User avatar
A_B
The Dude
Posts: 23319
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:36 am
Location: Getting them boards like a wolf in the chicken pen.

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by A_B »

God I hate those guys.
You know what you need? A lyrical sucker punch to the face.
User avatar
mister d
The Dude
Posts: 29047
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 8:15 am

Re: Death to the NCAA

Post by mister d »

brian wrote: Thu Jul 01, 2021 5:01 pm
rass wrote: Thu Jul 01, 2021 4:19 pm Father of a current/recent student, perv, or both?
If it's who I think it is, closer to the latter but still not really accurate.
It’s Johnnie. He’s our Instagram boy here.
Johnnie wrote: Sat Sep 10, 2022 8:13 pmOh shit, you just reminded me about toilet paper.
Post Reply