The Swamp

tennbengal wrote: ↑Tue Nov 10, 2020 7:59 pm

Thanks Jo Jorgensen voters!

So even if Biden holds AZ, it'll be by a smaller margin than GA.

Meanwhile, Cook Political Report's Popular Vote tracker has Biden up to 77 million votes now, with a margin of more than 5 million votes.

Only 4.9 million of that lead came from California, so he won the rest of the country also.

Biden also is leading by 1.1 million in MA, 875K in IL, and 850K in NY. Though NY is still only reporting 80% of its votes according to the page that pops up first on Google.

For anyone who's as nerdy as me but afraid to admit it, Trump's biggest margins are from TN (710K), TX 650K, AL 590K, and KY 550K.

I love that "if you just ignore California" is becoming an acceptable narrative to wipe out the popular vote.

mister d wrote: ↑Wed Nov 11, 2020 10:10 am I love that "if you just ignore California" is becoming an acceptable narrative to wipe out the popular vote.

Yeah, I think that this will ultimately be what leads to the breakup of the US. There's only so many times people in CA will allow themselves to be ruled by a government where the President is decided by a few hundred or thousand votes in Florida and the Dakotas have twice as much power in the Senate as they do.

So FOX came across someone who came forward with Voter fraud, but did want to show his face, so FOX interviewed him, hid him, and changed his voice. Now several people are saying it was Trump.

That was hilarious.

It really seemed like his speech pattern, and he has a long history of calling under the pseudonym John Barron to talk about how great Trump is. I wouldn't be in the least surprised if Trump did that and Ingraham was in on it.

That's 1000 percent Trump. It's not even disguised that well.

If it's not Trump, it's someone doing a Trump impression and then having it slightly altered.

Either way, feels like a troll job.

That's not real, frogs.

Gunpowder wrote: ↑Wed Nov 11, 2020 2:38 pm That's not real, frogs.

God damnit. The Twitter handle even has "manipulated media" in the name!

F. I just realized that..

The interview was real tho

Old white people just can't stop falling for scams, amiright?

brian wrote: ↑Wed Nov 11, 2020 3:24 pm

*Brian, AB and Nate high five!*

Think how much a cunt Trump is for not sharing the intelligence briefings, for the good of the country, suggesting there’s no chance his challenges will fail, and Biden has zero chance of being president. What a fucking cumstain.

JFC 🤦🏻‍♂️
Brad Heath has some of the info the President has.

Where do they find these idiots??

Also prepared for rallies starting Jan 21st. Hope this fuck goes to prison.

Poor Biden

Bag it. Trump would need a 36% margin in the remaining votes and there is a lot of blue left. Done. The AZ/NV/MI/WI/NE1 firewall intact. Taking shenanigans in PA and GA off the table.

Pima county is Tucson and those tend blue.

tennbengal wrote: ↑Wed Nov 11, 2020 10:27 pmPima county is Tucson and those tend blue.

Yuuuuuppp.

In the plus side, announcing 2024 means he is admitting he lost (or defying the Constitution and planning a 3rd therm). I think he just wants to continue fundraising. If the media has a shred of decency, they need to completely ignore his rallies and take his oxygen.

The way his brain works though... he can announce 2024 and still claim the 2020 election.

P.D.X. wrote: ↑Thu Nov 12, 2020 9:09 am The way his brain works though... he can announce 2024 and still claim the 2020 election.

Remember, the "Russia hoax" denied him most of his first term, so he's really entitled to two more anyway.

I was reading some of the stuff on the Senate races last night and I don't get the Dems at all.. They should be lobbying for a recount in Kentucky.

There are more registered Dems then Repubs in KY, McConnell got alot more votes them there are Repub Voters. You really going to tell me 25-35% of Dems voted for him? LOL

They also should have asked for the Senate seat in Georgia to be recounted.

Here is a interesting Thread on Kentucky

No. This is not correct. Party registration is meaningless in these states.

Yeah, I'd be curious to compare to previous elections. Pretty sure McConnell always pulls in huge numbers of Dem votes. Congressional incumbents have a huge advantage in name recognition. While Congressional approval ratings are always dismally low, approval towards their own Members poll high. As others said, I don't think a majority of KY Dems are on board with the Blue No Matter Who doctrine.

Steve of phpBB wrote: ↑Thu Nov 12, 2020 11:07 am No. This is not correct. Party registration is meaningless in these states.

The Sybian wrote: ↑Thu Nov 12, 2020 11:23 am Yeah, I'd be curious to compare to previous elections. Pretty sure McConnell always pulls in huge numbers of Dem votes. Congressional incumbents have a huge advantage in name recognition. While Congressional approval ratings are always dismally low, approval towards their own Members poll high. As others said, I don't think a majority of KY Dems are on board with the Blue No Matter Who doctrine.

Steve of phpBB wrote: ↑Thu Nov 12, 2020 11:07 am No. This is not correct. Party registration is meaningless in these states.

The best way to control the politics in your state is to infiltrate the opposite party and sit down.

It’s positively machiavellian.

The Sybian wrote: ↑Thu Nov 12, 2020 11:23 am Yeah, I'd be curious to compare to previous elections. Pretty sure McConnell always pulls in huge numbers of Dem votes. Congressional incumbents have a huge advantage in name recognition. While Congressional approval ratings are always dismally low, approval towards their own Members poll high. As others said, I don't think a majority of KY Dems are on board with the Blue No Matter Who doctrine.

I doubt the people who vote for him consider themselves Democrats. Or if they do, they don't vote for any democrats, except possibly the governor.

Political folks like the Nates write about this all the time - party registration figures simply don't line up with current political preferences in a lot of these states that used to be Democratic but went Republican when the racists did.

Steve of phpBB wrote: ↑Thu Nov 12, 2020 4:28 pm

The Sybian wrote: ↑Thu Nov 12, 2020 11:23 am Yeah, I'd be curious to compare to previous elections. Pretty sure McConnell always pulls in huge numbers of Dem votes. Congressional incumbents have a huge advantage in name recognition. While Congressional approval ratings are always dismally low, approval towards their own Members poll high. As others said, I don't think a majority of KY Dems are on board with the Blue No Matter Who doctrine.

I doubt the people who vote for him consider themselves Democrats. Or if they do, they don't vote for any democrats, except possibly the governor.

Political folks like the Nates write about this all the time - party registration figures simply don't line up with current political preferences in a lot of these states that used to be Democratic but went Republican when the racists did.

AS was stated above a lot of KY democrats just registered that way a long time ago and never changed. And in the last election we elected a Democrat but that was a close race against a wildly unpopular incumbent.

I love him.

Dude, stop.

IGNORE is your friend, everyone.

tennbengal wrote: ↑Thu Nov 12, 2020 6:34 pm IGNORE is your friend, everyone.

how do you do that?

P.D.X. wrote: ↑Thu Nov 12, 2020 7:31 pm

tennbengal wrote: ↑Thu Nov 12, 2020 6:34 pm IGNORE is your friend, everyone.

how do you do that?

As god is my witness, I can't figure out how I did it. But it must be possible, because he's on ignore. As was DC47 back in the day.