The Swamp

It's really not unreasonable to think that if 43k people stay home on election day in the right sectors of America that Trump gets re-elected.

If "doing marginally better in keeping America safe against COVID" is that reason, so be it.

It isn't provable by any means. But there's a legit reality where (more than?) 8 million more people can vote for the other guy, but the electoral college gives it to his/her opponent.

The filibuster needs to go. The electoral college needs to go.

EnochRoot wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 12:13 am 20% better would've changed a 306 to 232 resounding defeat to a landslide?

Huh.

Show your work.

Lets not under estimate how many Republicans voted against DT, and how many Dems came out to vote.. if he did better with Covid,those numbers are nothing. Absolutely heart wrenching how many died, but Dems should be Thankful he messed up Covid so bad.

It's telling how hard Dems had to work in Wisky, Ga, and Pa compared to what Repubs did and those states were close and probably the deciding states. Ga what Abrhams did was amazing, what happens if she doesn't do that? I would like to know how much her foot work in Ga motivated others in the other stated Biden won like Michigan, Nevada, Arizona.

Johnnie wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:19 am It's really not unreasonable to think that if 43k people stay home on election day in the right sectors of America that Trump gets re-elected.

If "doing marginally better in keeping America safe against COVID" is that reason, so be it.

It isn't provable by any means. But there's a legit reality where (more than?) 8 million more people can vote for the other guy, but the electoral college gives it to his/her opponent.

The filibuster needs to go. The electoral college needs to go.

Dems will never have the votes in this term to end the filibuster.

EnochRoot wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 12:13 am 20% better would've changed a 306 to 232 resounding defeat to a landslide?

Huh.

Show your work.

Trump only needed to do 0.65% better to win. Biden’s margins in AZ, GA, and WI were all less than that.

I know we can't say anything bad about St. Joe here, but the first two stimulus from Trump went through fast and easy.. This one seems like it's going to be a mess. Also, TF they going to with taxes, we are a month from Taxes due and they have not addressed the 10,200 being non taxable from last year.

psunate77 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 11:11 am I know we can't say anything bad about St. Joe here, but the first two stimulus from Trump went through fast and easy.. This one seems like it's going to be a mess. Also, TF they going to with taxes, we are a month from Taxes due and they have not addressed the 10,200 being non taxable from last year.

I guess it depends on your source of info. All I'm seeing on Facebook is people surprised that the payments already deposited in their bank accounts. And all I heard on Trump's payments was delays, because Trump insisted on having his name added to paper checks, because direct deposits wouldn't allow him to make the payments all about him.

The Sybian wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 11:35 am

psunate77 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 11:11 am I know we can't say anything bad about St. Joe here, but the first two stimulus from Trump went through fast and easy.. This one seems like it's going to be a mess. Also, TF they going to with taxes, we are a month from Taxes due and they have not addressed the 10,200 being non taxable from last year.

I guess it depends on your source of info. All I'm seeing on Facebook is people surprised that the payments already deposited in their bank accounts. And all I heard on Trump's payments was delays, because Trump insisted on having his name added to paper checks, because direct deposits wouldn't allow him to make the payments all about him.

Exactly. The bill was effective on Thursday and put into effect in a few days? That may be the fastest execution of a federal law ever.

Literally saw screenshots of stimulus payments pending on Friday.

The fuck are you talking about?

Don't make me create another picture puzzle guys.

Nice Try Joe.. This will never go through.

Johnnie wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 4:01 pm Literally saw screenshots of stimulus payments pending on Friday.

The fuck are you talking about?

Find out when your payment was sent or will be sent, and by what means.

Remember when Trump acted like this?!

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMeBm5pEH/

All I see is a bunch of people in close quarters without masks.

But Biden's right. The guy is full of shit.

That clip is over one year old. And doesn't give the entire response. And what is wrong with someone willing to tell it straight. I thought your ilk loved real talk. And trump never responded like that because he never took direct questions from his constituents.

Johnnie wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 10:45 pm All I see is a bunch of people in close quarters without masks.

But Biden's right. The guy is full of shit.

The guy asked what a lot of voters were worried about, protecting their second amendment right. Biden could have answered better. Remember how people got a coronary when Trump called the reporter a light weight??

Remember how Obama took everyone's guns?

Actually, remember the pants shitting from idiot Republicans day in and day out about Obama taking their guns?

Children were mass murdered in this country, some extreme Republicans cried false flag, and Obama still didn't take their guns. It's kinda like the president cannot unilaterally do that.

Please stop with your fucking bullshit, Nate. You shared a year old video and it means fuck all.

Johnnie wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 7:07 am Remember how Obama took everyone's guns?

Actually, remember the pants shitting from idiot Republicans day in and day out about Obama taking their guns?

Children were mass murdered in this country, some extreme Republicans cried false flag, and Obama still didn't take their guns. It's kinda like the president cannot unilaterally do that.

Please stop with your fucking bullshit, Nate. You shared a year old video and it means fuck all.

Oh geez. Saint Joe. Can’t say anything bad about him.

psunate77 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 7:09 am Oh geez. Saint Joe. Can’t say anything bad about him.

He's dead and didn't care that his coach was raping kids.

psunate77 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 7:09 am

Johnnie wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 7:07 am Remember how Obama took everyone's guns?

Actually, remember the pants shitting from idiot Republicans day in and day out about Obama taking their guns?

Children were mass murdered in this country, some extreme Republicans cried false flag, and Obama still didn't take their guns. It's kinda like the president cannot unilaterally do that.

Please stop with your fucking bullshit, Nate. You shared a year old video and it means fuck all.

Oh geez. Saint Joe. Can’t say anything bad about him.

It’s not about saying something bad. It’s about saying something dumb.

rass wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 7:12 amHe's dead and didn't care that his coach was raping kids.

You only said one thing bad.

psunate77 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 7:09 amOh geez. Saint Joe. Can’t say anything bad about him.

Fucking wut. Have you seen my posts on this board?

Why are you guys still engaging?

rass wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 7:12 am

psunate77 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 7:09 am Oh geez. Saint Joe. Can’t say anything bad about him.

He's dead and didn't care that his coach was raping kids.

You are uneducated.. He reported it, unlike anyone else.. Nice try fuckface.. Now back to sucking Biden's dick.

*whistling to self in corner of room*

psunate77 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 7:47 am

rass wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 7:12 am

psunate77 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 7:09 am Oh geez. Saint Joe. Can’t say anything bad about him.

He's dead and didn't care that his coach was raping kids.

You are uneducated.. He reported it, unlike anyone else.. Nice try fuckface.. Now back to sucking Biden's dick.

Sure, he reported it, but only because he thought he had to. But he didn't act upon it otherwise. A truly great man wouldn't let bureaucracy or committees or even worries about his career stand in the way of doing what is right to protect kids. Kids! He was part of the cover-up. That you can't see that really makes me doubt the sincerity of some of your posts here. But maybe that's just me.

And you doubled up some, but not all, of your periods. That's weird man.

Sure would be nice if the swamp handle psunate77 were as dead as Joe Paterno, who is totally and irreversibly dead.

mister d wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 8:18 am Sure would be nice if the swamp handle psunate77 were as dead as Joe Paterno, who is totally and irreversibly dead.

You wanna threaten my life? Why don't you come say shit to my face instead of hiding behind a username.

Don't worry tho, I am leaving. I don't want to be associated with Socialist Frog anyways.

No one threatened your life so, unlike Joe Paterno (who is dead), you will stay alive even if/when your ID here is finally blocked.

Just use the damn ignore function. We'll do a tutorial again if anyone wants it.

rass wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 8:00 am Sure, he reported it, but only because he thought he had to. But he didn't act upon it otherwise. A truly great man wouldn't let bureaucracy or committees or even worries about his career stand in the way of doing what is right to protect kids. Kids! He was part of the cover-up. That you can't see that really makes me doubt the sincerity of some of your posts here. But maybe that's just me.

And you doubled up some, but not all, of your periods. That's weird man.

Please stop quoting his trash. +1 to what you posted Rass. If someone thinks he did enough they need to fuck off. I'm tired of hearing that the minimum is good enough for anything other than possibly avoiding prosecution.

i think this will go down as one of the lamest swamp "retirements" and that is really saying something considering they're all naturally pretty fucking lame.

serrano wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 12:02 pm i think this will go down as one of the lamest swamp "retirements" and that is really saying something considering they're all naturally pretty fucking lame.

Pruitt's first Swamp tenure ended with some flourish. What was his first user name?

serrano wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 12:02 pm i think this will go down as one of the lamest swamp "retirements" and that is really saying something considering they're all naturally pretty fucking lame.

In Socialist Frog, Swamp retires you.

The Sybian wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 12:05 pm

serrano wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 12:02 pm i think this will go down as one of the lamest swamp "retirements" and that is really saying something considering they're all naturally pretty fucking lame.

Pruitt's first Swamp tenure ended with some flourish. What was his first user name?

"PaternoSucksDick" or some such.

CynicismUnlimited69

Is he done? Did he find his rock to crawl back under?

His entire return which was clearly calculated to bathe in pain when Trump won didn't go like he thought it would, did it?

Ooh, what did I miss in here? I guess I need to look back a few days, huh?

Shirley wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 4:26 pm Ooh, what did I miss in here? I guess I need to look back a few days, huh?

Or months. Or a year or so.

What a weird long game. All that investment just to own the libz?

Did I miss some deleted posts or something?