Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
Moderators: Shirley, Sabo, brian, rass, DaveInSeattle
- degenerasian
- The Dude
- Posts: 12394
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:22 pm
Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
I was told years ago, why bet on a pick'em game that's 50/50 when you can parlay two favorites and make more than par.
For example (using decimal odds), betting on a pick'em game only yields 1.90 while it only takes a pair of 1.42s to get to 2.00
Especially a sport like baseball where there isn't parity, the favorites will win all the time.
But I was skeptical because it's tough for a team to win even 100 games out of 162.
I think I have to look for good pitching matchups which is difficult to do on opening day since it's all #1 starters.
I have $500 in my account, I'll do $30 bets and see where it leads me.
Yesterday I took
Pirates (Liriano) and Tigers (Verlander) $30 X 1.55 X 1.66 = 77.19
WON 47.19
Marlins (Fernandez) and Angels (Weaver) $30 X 1.59 X 1.82 = 86.81
LOST $30
Balance $517.19
I guess it is not surprising that I lost the 1.82 game.
Today I'm taking Dodgers (Greinke) and Yankees (Sabathia) $30 X 1.66 X 1.66 = 82.67
I was thinking maybe the Rays instead of the Dodgers but I wanted to watch a day game.
Think I'll make it to June? Or is this strategy bogus?
For example (using decimal odds), betting on a pick'em game only yields 1.90 while it only takes a pair of 1.42s to get to 2.00
Especially a sport like baseball where there isn't parity, the favorites will win all the time.
But I was skeptical because it's tough for a team to win even 100 games out of 162.
I think I have to look for good pitching matchups which is difficult to do on opening day since it's all #1 starters.
I have $500 in my account, I'll do $30 bets and see where it leads me.
Yesterday I took
Pirates (Liriano) and Tigers (Verlander) $30 X 1.55 X 1.66 = 77.19
WON 47.19
Marlins (Fernandez) and Angels (Weaver) $30 X 1.59 X 1.82 = 86.81
LOST $30
Balance $517.19
I guess it is not surprising that I lost the 1.82 game.
Today I'm taking Dodgers (Greinke) and Yankees (Sabathia) $30 X 1.66 X 1.66 = 82.67
I was thinking maybe the Rays instead of the Dodgers but I wanted to watch a day game.
Think I'll make it to June? Or is this strategy bogus?
Kung Fu movies are like porn. There's 1 on 1, then 2 on 1, then a group scene..
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
Yeah, your math is a little shaky. The odds are the same long-term regardless of whether you bet the games straight up or do parlays, though I will say that the one positive move is that the odds for baseball parlays as you describe here are at least "true" parlay odds as opposed to the crappy 12/5 odds you get in Vegas on -110 (standard odds i.e. football) parlays.
In the long run, your risk of ruin is exactly the same as if you just bet one game a day whether you bet the favorite or dog or whatever.
(ETA: This isn't to say that you shouldn't endeavor on your little experiment. Sounds like fun and is just as "sound" a betting strategy as betting one game a day or whatever.)
In the long run, your risk of ruin is exactly the same as if you just bet one game a day whether you bet the favorite or dog or whatever.
(ETA: This isn't to say that you shouldn't endeavor on your little experiment. Sounds like fun and is just as "sound" a betting strategy as betting one game a day or whatever.)
Bandwagon fan of the 2023 STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS!
- degenerasian
- The Dude
- Posts: 12394
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:22 pm
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
Can't really bet one game a day cause baseball doesn't really have a spread so there's no equalization like football where you can take the best (-110) game on Sunday.
Picking underdogs in baseball probably isn't the best strategy and the -1.5 run spread is probably the dumbest bet in sports. -1.5 runs is usually for the home team and to take a team hitting 8 innings to beat a team hitting 9 innings by 2 runs is such a disadvantage.
Picking underdogs in baseball probably isn't the best strategy and the -1.5 run spread is probably the dumbest bet in sports. -1.5 runs is usually for the home team and to take a team hitting 8 innings to beat a team hitting 9 innings by 2 runs is such a disadvantage.
Kung Fu movies are like porn. There's 1 on 1, then 2 on 1, then a group scene..
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
Baseball is the worst sport to just bet recreationally. You'll have to be a high volume bettor, I'd say.
Pack a vest for your james in the city of intercourse
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
I like your LA over SD bet at -140.
Pack a vest for your james in the city of intercourse
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
I also love Miami straight up behind Eovaldi over Colorado starting a relief pitcher.
Pack a vest for your james in the city of intercourse
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
Third fave is Texas/Philly over 8.5
Pack a vest for your james in the city of intercourse
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
The best strategy is making the best bet given the odds, no different than any other sport regardless of how the odds are constructed. The only way to win at sports betting is to bet with an edge. Unless you're a math/stats wizard crunching numbers that no one else has access to, then that edge is best gained with information. The more information you have than other bettors gives you an advantage since the house only wants to take an even amount of money on each game.degenerasian wrote:Can't really bet one game a day cause baseball doesn't really have a spread so there's no equalization like football where you can take the best (-110) game on Sunday.
Picking underdogs in baseball probably isn't the best strategy and the -1.5 run spread is probably the dumbest bet in sports. -1.5 runs is usually for the home team and to take a team hitting 8 innings to beat a team hitting 9 innings by 2 runs is such a disadvantage.
If you think you have an edge/advantage on a spread where a dog is +200 then you load up on the dog. If you think a -300 favorite would actually win 4 out of every 5 trials then you load up on the favorite.
Bandwagon fan of the 2023 STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS!
- Rams Fanny
- Bunny Lebowski
- Posts: 623
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 5:32 pm
- Location: Henderson, NV
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
Betting math, love it. Parlays can indeed be profitable, but if you are a good handicapper then they will cost you money over the long haul if bet consistently. Yesterday is a perfect example. Let's say you bet $30 on each game instead of on two team parlays:
$30 x 1.55 (w)= 46.50 +16.50
$30 x 1.66 (w)= 49.80 +19.80
$30 x 1.59 (w)= 47.70 +17.70
$30 x 1.82 (L)= 0 -30
So we have 16.50 + 19.80 + 17.70 - 30 = +24 vs +17.70 your parlays produced. I'm certainly not crapping on $17.70, any day in the + is a good day, but you left money on the table.
Parlays are a multiplier and while we are lured in by the multiplied winnings, it works in reverse also. Let's say you only hit two out of four in a given day (which will happen more often than not). Your system will only be sustainable if both losses come in the same parlay. If they come one in each parlay you have nothing to show for your respectable day of picking 50%. Assuming odds are relatively close for each game as they were yesterday, betting individually will give you a smaller loss than if both losses are in the same parlay which would be better still than if a loss happened in each parlay.
My advice: handicap games on their own merit and if you find two (or three, whatever) that are very strong then parlay. Otherwise stick to betting per game. Your system requires you to bet in pairs, which will mean you will have to talk yourself into games which may (will) cost you money.
I also want to steer you away from a type of gamblers logic professed in the first sentence of your post. The whole basis of that system is you are basing decisions on the odds given. Handicap first without looking at the odds. A winner at 1.0 ALWAYS pays more than a loser at 1.5.
Good Luck!
ETA: I see that if you bet $15/game (to keep $$ bet same), your system would have been more profitable by $5.70. My points on where the losses come and long term profitability remain same.
$30 x 1.55 (w)= 46.50 +16.50
$30 x 1.66 (w)= 49.80 +19.80
$30 x 1.59 (w)= 47.70 +17.70
$30 x 1.82 (L)= 0 -30
So we have 16.50 + 19.80 + 17.70 - 30 = +24 vs +17.70 your parlays produced. I'm certainly not crapping on $17.70, any day in the + is a good day, but you left money on the table.
Parlays are a multiplier and while we are lured in by the multiplied winnings, it works in reverse also. Let's say you only hit two out of four in a given day (which will happen more often than not). Your system will only be sustainable if both losses come in the same parlay. If they come one in each parlay you have nothing to show for your respectable day of picking 50%. Assuming odds are relatively close for each game as they were yesterday, betting individually will give you a smaller loss than if both losses are in the same parlay which would be better still than if a loss happened in each parlay.
My advice: handicap games on their own merit and if you find two (or three, whatever) that are very strong then parlay. Otherwise stick to betting per game. Your system requires you to bet in pairs, which will mean you will have to talk yourself into games which may (will) cost you money.
I also want to steer you away from a type of gamblers logic professed in the first sentence of your post. The whole basis of that system is you are basing decisions on the odds given. Handicap first without looking at the odds. A winner at 1.0 ALWAYS pays more than a loser at 1.5.
Good Luck!
ETA: I see that if you bet $15/game (to keep $$ bet same), your system would have been more profitable by $5.70. My points on where the losses come and long term profitability remain same.
"Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair or fucking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back." -Al Swearengen
- Rams Fanny
- Bunny Lebowski
- Posts: 623
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 5:32 pm
- Location: Henderson, NV
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
Rather than do an edit, I want to add a thought about my previous post. I chose to use $30 as an individual base bet because a parlay is an if-then bet. At $30 x 1.55 x 1.66, you are telling the Book take my $30 x 1.55 = $46.50 and bet that as $46.50 x 1.66. You are essentially betting that except you don't have the option to back out/not make bet #2.
Just wanted to further clarify why I was making the assumption of $120 total bet as opposed to the $60 you laid down.
Just wanted to further clarify why I was making the assumption of $120 total bet as opposed to the $60 you laid down.
"Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair or fucking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back." -Al Swearengen
- degenerasian
- The Dude
- Posts: 12394
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:22 pm
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
Yes I may have left money on the table getting 3 out of 4 but I don't want to bear the brunt of losing all 4 games individually at -140 for each of them. By doing a parlay it just feels better to get back something more than 2.00 (+100).
I've limited it to 2 though, doing continuous 4 game parlays would be difficult.
This will hopefully be a season-long experiment. Might be stupid by the end of it all.
I've limited it to 2 though, doing continuous 4 game parlays would be difficult.
This will hopefully be a season-long experiment. Might be stupid by the end of it all.
Kung Fu movies are like porn. There's 1 on 1, then 2 on 1, then a group scene..
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
I think parlays are great if you are betting more for fun and entertainment than for pure profit. The feeling of hitting one is awesome, too.
Pack a vest for your james in the city of intercourse
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
Yeah, I hope the point of my post wasn't taken as "don't do parlays". It was more like "don't feel like you have to have a system". Because systems never work.
Bandwagon fan of the 2023 STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS!
- Rams Fanny
- Bunny Lebowski
- Posts: 623
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 5:32 pm
- Location: Henderson, NV
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
I agree 100% with this. When it's more than fun, well, you know the rest.Gunpowder wrote:I think parlays are great if you are betting more for fun and entertainment than for pure profit. The feeling of hitting one is awesome, too.
Original post asked about the system itself and I was just pointing out that math was not in your favor long term vs individual bets. Doesn't mean it won't work and I hope it does for you.
"Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair or fucking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back." -Al Swearengen
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
Yeah, I wasn't disagreeing with yinz guys, just throwin' my opinion up in here.
Pack a vest for your james in the city of intercourse
- degenerasian
- The Dude
- Posts: 12394
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:22 pm
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
Love all the opinions. I think this will be a fun experiment.
Not only is the math probably sketchy but I have to pick the right games as well. If there were 5 -140 games and I took the one that lost instead of the one that won then it's my suckiness isn't it.
Not only is the math probably sketchy but I have to pick the right games as well. If there were 5 -140 games and I took the one that lost instead of the one that won then it's my suckiness isn't it.
Kung Fu movies are like porn. There's 1 on 1, then 2 on 1, then a group scene..
- degenerasian
- The Dude
- Posts: 12394
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:22 pm
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
Sheesh 6-0 Astros.
Kung Fu movies are like porn. There's 1 on 1, then 2 on 1, then a group scene..
- degenerasian
- The Dude
- Posts: 12394
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:22 pm
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
Yankees lost yesterday
Balance: $487.19
Today (Afternoon)
Tigers (Scherzer) and Brewers (Garza) $30 X 1.54 X 1.82 = $84.08
Balance: $487.19
Today (Afternoon)
Tigers (Scherzer) and Brewers (Garza) $30 X 1.54 X 1.82 = $84.08
Kung Fu movies are like porn. There's 1 on 1, then 2 on 1, then a group scene..
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
I went two for three to rake in $0!
Pack a vest for your james in the city of intercourse
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
I bet on the Giants and got screwed (partly) by Bochy being an idiot and wasting his challenge on a stupid pickoff play.Gunpowder wrote:I went two for three to rake in $0!
Bandwagon fan of the 2023 STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS!
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
Harang starting in Milwaukee suggests over 8.5
Washington -130 over NYM seems like good value
Those are Gunpowder's two soaking hot locks
Washington -130 over NYM seems like good value
Those are Gunpowder's two soaking hot locks
Pack a vest for your james in the city of intercourse
- degenerasian
- The Dude
- Posts: 12394
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:22 pm
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
Gunpowder wrote:Harang starting in Milwaukee suggests over 8.5
Washington -130 over NYM seems like good value
Those are Gunpowder's two soaking hot locks
of course I take the Brewers, you take the over and Harang takes a no-hitter into the 7th.
Kung Fu movies are like porn. There's 1 on 1, then 2 on 1, then a group scene..
- degenerasian
- The Dude
- Posts: 12394
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:22 pm
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
Balance: $457.19
Today (Evening)
Pirates (Morton) and Rangers (Ross) $30 X 1.64 X 1.59 = 78.228
Today (Evening)
Pirates (Morton) and Rangers (Ross) $30 X 1.64 X 1.59 = 78.228
Kung Fu movies are like porn. There's 1 on 1, then 2 on 1, then a group scene..
- Rams Fanny
- Bunny Lebowski
- Posts: 623
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 5:32 pm
- Location: Henderson, NV
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
I'll join if that's ok.
Wash/NYM ov7 Even
Phil/Tex over 9.5 -105
Both for $40
Wash/NYM ov7 Even
Phil/Tex over 9.5 -105
Both for $40
"Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair or fucking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back." -Al Swearengen
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
degenerasian wrote:Gunpowder wrote:Harang starting in Milwaukee suggests over 8.5
Washington -130 over NYM seems like good value
Those are Gunpowder's two soaking hot locks
of course I take the Brewers, you take the over and Harang takes a no-hitter into the 7th.
Good thing I didn't actually take them. A freakin' two way no hitter into the 7th on my smoking hot lock! At least Washington picked up some of my hypothetical slack.
Pack a vest for your james in the city of intercourse
- degenerasian
- The Dude
- Posts: 12394
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:22 pm
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
Texas with the miracle comeback but Pirates are probably going to lose.
Kung Fu movies are like porn. There's 1 on 1, then 2 on 1, then a group scene..
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
Pirates blew it for you.
Pack a vest for your james in the city of intercourse
- degenerasian
- The Dude
- Posts: 12394
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:22 pm
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
Pirates tie it up in the 12th but leave the bases loaded. Veras threw 38 pitches that inning!
on we go!
on we go!
Kung Fu movies are like porn. There's 1 on 1, then 2 on 1, then a group scene..
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
Pedro's gonna bring it home for you.
Pack a vest for your james in the city of intercourse
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
Veras picking up right where Marmol left off.
Pack a vest for your james in the city of intercourse
- degenerasian
- The Dude
- Posts: 12394
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:22 pm
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
Cubs turned a 7-2-3 double play. Pirates left the bases loaded again.
Kung Fu movies are like porn. There's 1 on 1, then 2 on 1, then a group scene..
- degenerasian
- The Dude
- Posts: 12394
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:22 pm
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
woo, lucked out last night
Balance: $505.42
Looks like a tough slate today. Going with Pirates (Rodriguez) and Tigers (Sanchez) again
$30 X 1.62 X 1.65 = $80.19
Balance: $505.42
Looks like a tough slate today. Going with Pirates (Rodriguez) and Tigers (Sanchez) again
$30 X 1.62 X 1.65 = $80.19
Kung Fu movies are like porn. There's 1 on 1, then 2 on 1, then a group scene..
- A_B
- The Dude
- Posts: 23591
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:36 am
- Location: Getting them boards like a wolf in the chicken pen.
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
Apparently if the Reds-Cardinals O/U is 1.5, go under.
Hold on, I'm trying to see if Jack London ever gets this fire built or not.
- degenerasian
- The Dude
- Posts: 12394
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:22 pm
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
Tigers rained out.
Pirates down 2-0 with the Cubs threatening.
I'm cheering for rain there too now.
Pirates down 2-0 with the Cubs threatening.
I'm cheering for rain there too now.
Kung Fu movies are like porn. There's 1 on 1, then 2 on 1, then a group scene..
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
Thunder is rolling but they may get lucky.
Pack a vest for your james in the city of intercourse
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
Did the lightning strike? What about your love? Did it run cold, perhaps on a sleepless night?Gunpowder wrote:Thunder is rolling but they may get lucky.
well this is gonna be someone's new signature - bronto
- degenerasian
- The Dude
- Posts: 12394
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:22 pm
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
Balance: $475.42
Today (Afternoon)
Nationals (Zimmerman) and Red Sox (Peavy)
$30 X 1.60 X 1.64 = $78.72
Today (Afternoon)
Nationals (Zimmerman) and Red Sox (Peavy)
$30 X 1.60 X 1.64 = $78.72
Kung Fu movies are like porn. There's 1 on 1, then 2 on 1, then a group scene..
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
Giff wrote:Did the lightning strike? What about your love? Did it run cold, perhaps on a sleepless night?Gunpowder wrote:Thunder is rolling but they may get lucky.
That's exactly what I was thinking as I wrote it.
Pack a vest for your james in the city of intercourse
- degenerasian
- The Dude
- Posts: 12394
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:22 pm
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
both Nats and Sox lost, I'm awesome.
Balance: $445.42
Tonight:
Yankees (Tanaka) and Rays (Odorizzi)
$30 X 1.74 X 1.66 = $86.65
Balance: $445.42
Tonight:
Yankees (Tanaka) and Rays (Odorizzi)
$30 X 1.74 X 1.66 = $86.65
Kung Fu movies are like porn. There's 1 on 1, then 2 on 1, then a group scene..
- degenerasian
- The Dude
- Posts: 12394
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:22 pm
Re: Degen's MLB Gambling Odyssey
Recovered with a win last night.
Balance: $502.07
Today (Afternoon)
Indians (Carrasco) and Royals (Chen)
$30 X 1.59 X 1.66 = $79.19
Balance: $502.07
Today (Afternoon)
Indians (Carrasco) and Royals (Chen)
$30 X 1.59 X 1.66 = $79.19
Kung Fu movies are like porn. There's 1 on 1, then 2 on 1, then a group scene..