L-Jam3 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 30, 2018 10:07 am
I'm using a separate post. I need to wrap my head around this as a timeline.
In early 2016, GOP candidates hire Christopher Steele to dig up dirt on Trump.
After Trump secures the nomination, around summer 2016, Hilary's team then go forward with Steele's company to continue to dig up dirt on Trump.
Late summer 2016, information gleaned by Steele's dirt-digging leads to securing a warrant for a wiretap of Trump due to possible working with a foreign government, i.e. the fucking Russians, to swing OUR election.
Notwithstanding fucking Russia's help, Trump wins the electoral college and the presidency. For the sake of argument, fucking Russia's actions weren't successful in flipping any states, but everyone agrees that fucking Russia tried to interfere.
Congressman Devin Nunes works on Trump's transition team, November 2016-January 2017.
After Trump's inauguration, the FBI starts looking into the interference by the fucking Russians.
In April 2017 (or May, I can't recall exactly), Trump fires James Comey, the head of the FBI, the group investigating the interference by the fucking Russians.
In June 2017, Robert Mueller is enpaneled to lead the investigation of the interference in OUR election by the fucking Russians.
Congressman Nunes, who is also the head of the House Intelligence Committee, temporarily recuses himself, as he worked in the transition team for the candidate that the fucking Russians wanted in the White House so much they interfered in OUR election.
Later, Congressman Nunes returns to the oversight of the investigation.
At some point, the House Intelligence Committee, headed by Congressman Nunes who worked on the Trump transition team, holds a closed-door hearing regarding the work by Christopher Steele which was used to secure a warrant for a wiretap.
Although it's closed-door and classified, Congressman Nunes, who worked on the Trump transition team, drafts a memo outlining the hearing. Since he is the drafter of this memo, it is highly likely that his own biases or slanted view of the testimony comes into his writing (he's a human being, after all, and humans are biased by nature. He isn't an automaton.)
There are other members of the House Intelligence Committee who observed it, yet the only one being disclosed is Nunes', remembering that Nunes worked on the transition team for Trump, the candidate the fucking Russians wanted in the White House so much they interfered with in OUR election.
What am I missing?