This could be the Swamp's motto at least until November.Nonlinear FC wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 9:43 am Again, not saying to ignore one over the other.
The 2018 statewide wins in places like VA... That was mostly suburban backlash to Trump.
Edit. First response was unnecessarily bitchy.
The bottom line for me on this, Bernie and Biden both have a TON of work to do. They have major weaknesses in a general. Debating that particular point is bizarre to me.
2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
Moderators: Shirley, Sabo, brian, rass, DaveInSeattle
- A_B
- The Dude
- Posts: 23591
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:36 am
- Location: Getting them boards like a wolf in the chicken pen.
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
Hold on, I'm trying to see if Jack London ever gets this fire built or not.
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
Because the right has it figured out. Why work to hurt the other side of the aisle when they're doing it to themselves. Fascism is going to have a nice lark in this country because too many people have been convinced to destroy 95% of what they agree on because they can't get over the 5% they don't. And they all watch the same media that feeds the fire and laughs it all the way to the bank. This isn't 4-d Chess, it's Occam's Razor.
Dances with Wolves (1) - BSF
"This place was rockin'," said BSF21.
"There is nothing ever uncommon about BSF21."
"This place was rockin'," said BSF21.
"There is nothing ever uncommon about BSF21."
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
And this narrative has already been put in play again. "Vote Blue No Matter Who" even rhymes with "Have Our Cake and Eat It Too". If those who have rallied around Bernie don't allow the party to have final say, prioritizing centrist tax concerns over their own well-being, then its their fault the party doesn't win. The reverse does not apply.Joe K wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 9:52 amIt has nothing to do with whether we like Schumer. The quote would have no less significance if Obama said it. My point was that the Democratic Party already failed once against Trump, in what should’ve been a much easier election cycle, because of a blinkered focus on suburban voters while offering scraps to the working class.
- Nonlinear FC
- The Dude
- Posts: 11075
- Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 2:09 pm
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
Well, you should've seen I edited that comment. You seem really intent on having a debate on a topic where I'm agreeing with you.Joe K wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 9:52 amIt has nothing to do with whether we like Schumer. The quote would have no less significance if Obama said it. My point was that the Democratic Party already failed once against Trump, in what should’ve been a much easier election cycle, because of a blinkered focus on suburban voters while offering scraps to the working class.Nonlinear FC wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 9:43 am Again, not saying to ignore one over the other.
The 2018 statewide wins in places like VA... That was mostly suburban backlash to Trump.
But, you know, keep pulling quotes from people we don't like to win whatever debate you think we're having.
But you also need to be REALLY careful if you are conflating moderate, Fox news watching suburban voters and the people I'm talking about. Dyed in the wool Democrats that are scared to death of Bernie.
Again, I'm not saying we should "ignore the working class." But you can't win in certain parts of the country by pissing off/ignoring suburban voters.
You can lead a horse to fish, but you can't fish out a horse.
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
More macro question, maybe. If Democrats, both a segment of the rank-and-file and especially party leadership, are terrified of Bernie, who represents the growing left?Nonlinear FC wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 10:15 amDyed in the wool Democrats that are scared to death of Bernie.
- degenerasian
- The Dude
- Posts: 12394
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:22 pm
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
I think the Democrats put themselves into a corner with having to cater to this group or another.
A simple question. Regardless of the nominee, does the VP have to be:
a) a women
b) a minority
c) both
d) neither
A simple question. Regardless of the nominee, does the VP have to be:
a) a women
b) a minority
c) both
d) neither
Kung Fu movies are like porn. There's 1 on 1, then 2 on 1, then a group scene..
- Nonlinear FC
- The Dude
- Posts: 11075
- Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 2:09 pm
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
I don't speak for this cohort, I'm just aware of it.mister d wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 10:20 amMore macro question, maybe. If Democrats, both a segment of the rank-and-file and especially party leadership, are terrified of Bernie, who represents the growing left?Nonlinear FC wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 10:15 amDyed in the wool Democrats that are scared to death of Bernie.
I think there are people like Stacey Abrams and Elizabeth Warren that carry a progressive mantel and don't freak people out.
There's a pretty fundamental disagreement within the party. I don't agree with BSF... I think the difference on policy is much more significant on key issues. Would most folks live with either alternative, as opposed to Trump, of course.
But turnout is going to be huge in November, and there are troubling signs out there.
You can lead a horse to fish, but you can't fish out a horse.
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
Are those dyed in the wool Dems not going to vote if Bernie gets the nomination? I highly doubt it. That would be very destructive on their part. Just like the progressives will most likely vote for Biden if he ends up getting the nomination.
I don't understand people deciding to sit out a vote of this nature. What is the point/stance these people are willing to take?
I don't understand people deciding to sit out a vote of this nature. What is the point/stance these people are willing to take?
To quote both Bruce Prichard and Tony Schiavone, "Fuck Duff Meltzer."
- A_B
- The Dude
- Posts: 23591
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:36 am
- Location: Getting them boards like a wolf in the chicken pen.
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
For lomes: Imagine if you will a woman candidate who is clearly sundowning, another woman who recently had a heart attack, both pushing 80, versus a congenial healthy male candidate who has a plan for everything and tell me who the clear frontrunner would be.
Hold on, I'm trying to see if Jack London ever gets this fire built or not.
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
"I can't stand Trump but Bernie is going to take every dollar over 29,000 I make and tax it at 52%"duff wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 10:37 am Are those dyed in the wool Dems not going to vote if Bernie gets the nomination? I highly doubt it. That would be very destructive on their part. Just like the progressives will most likely vote for Biden if he ends up getting the nomination.
I don't understand people deciding to sit out a vote of this nature. What is the point/stance these people are willing to take?
"I can't stand Trump but Bernie working to regulate the banks will tank the stock market and I need my 401k"
"I can't stand Trump and I like to be vocal about how awful I think he is, but in reality what I want is to be better than my neighbor and have convinced myself that I work harder than everyone else and I deserve the success I have and Bernie is going to make it easier on lazy people that just don't put in the work that I do and don't deserve the same iPhone and Lexus I earned."
I can go on.
Dances with Wolves (1) - BSF
"This place was rockin'," said BSF21.
"There is nothing ever uncommon about BSF21."
"This place was rockin'," said BSF21.
"There is nothing ever uncommon about BSF21."
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
So maybe the same party shouldn't (and functionally doesn't) represent that person and the minimum wage worker who knows they need to work 80 hours per week, 50 out of 52 weeks in the year, just to make $29,000.
- Nonlinear FC
- The Dude
- Posts: 11075
- Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 2:09 pm
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
This is absolutely where we are at. I didn't want to tangent the conversation yesterday, but this really is the trajectory we are on.
You can lead a horse to fish, but you can't fish out a horse.
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
Those quotes to me are not the dyed in the wool Dems. Those are Republicans that won't everyone to believe they have a heart by donating 100$ to the Humane Society not realizing the money is going to drugs to euthanize the animals in the shelter. But it was a good deed, so it out weighs their desire to accumulate as much wealth as possible just so they can have their Lexus and iPhones.BSF21 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 10:47 am"I can't stand Trump but Bernie is going to take every dollar over 29,000 I make and tax it at 52%"duff wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 10:37 am Are those dyed in the wool Dems not going to vote if Bernie gets the nomination? I highly doubt it. That would be very destructive on their part. Just like the progressives will most likely vote for Biden if he ends up getting the nomination.
I don't understand people deciding to sit out a vote of this nature. What is the point/stance these people are willing to take?
"I can't stand Trump but Bernie working to regulate the banks will tank the stock market and I need my 401k"
"I can't stand Trump and I like to be vocal about how awful I think he is, but in reality what I want is to be better than my neighbor and have convinced myself that I work harder than everyone else and I deserve the success I have and Bernie is going to make it easier on lazy people that just don't put in the work that I do and don't deserve the same iPhone and Lexus I earned."
I can go on.
To quote both Bruce Prichard and Tony Schiavone, "Fuck Duff Meltzer."
- Steve of phpBB
- The Dude
- Posts: 8663
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:44 am
- Location: Feeling gravity's pull
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
Yes, and sadly, their votes count as much as anyone else's. And there's millions of them, and you need them to win. They're the ones who are turned off by Trump's chaos and who gave the Dems their House majority two years ago.duff wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 11:01 amThose are Republicans that won't everyone to believe they have a heart by donating 100$ to the Humane Society not realizing the money is going to drugs to euthanize the animals in the shelter. But it was a good deed, so it out weighs their desire to accumulate as much wealth as possible just so they can have their Lexus and iPhones.
And they generally vote, too, so they will likely either vote for Trump or the Dem. 2018 and the special elections showed that they can be willing to vote for a moderate Dem. But if you drive them into voting for Trump, now you have to get two other votes to make up for it.
And his one problem is he didn’t go to Russia that night because he had extracurricular activities, and they froze to death.
- Steve of phpBB
- The Dude
- Posts: 8663
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:44 am
- Location: Feeling gravity's pull
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
There is a political party that passed a bill raising the federal minimum wage. They also managed - at a cost of their own majority - to pass a law that raised taxes on the rich to fund free healthcare for more than ten million working poor. Their budgets always include increased spending for services needed by the working poor.
Is it enough? Of course not. But unfortunately, we live in a democracy, more or less, and the median household income is over $60,000. If you tell that median income maker "I am going to raise your taxes to help people making less than you," then those folks won't like you, and since there's more of those folks than there are working poor, you'll tend to lose.
And his one problem is he didn’t go to Russia that night because he had extracurricular activities, and they froze to death.
- Steve of phpBB
- The Dude
- Posts: 8663
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:44 am
- Location: Feeling gravity's pull
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
I was referring to something earlier in the thread.
But Sanders' proposals will clearly require tax increases on people other than those making $200K per year. We went through the math a couple of weeks ago.
Forty percent of households make at least $80K. A big chunk (35%?) make at least $100K. So I think the same principle applies unless you limit your increases to the obviously rich, and then see above.
(At any rate, hasn't Sanders proposed an additional tax on all income above $30K or so to pay for M 4 All?)
And his one problem is he didn’t go to Russia that night because he had extracurricular activities, and they froze to death.
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
These people are the ones that voted for Trump in 2016. Don't tell me that they voted for Hillary. No way. All they care about is lining their pockets with more money. They have no other issues they care about. Sure there are a handful of Republicans that abhor abortion and that is their only issue. Some are like that on guns, but most Republicans are more worried about the bottom line. They still live in a world where they believe anyone can rise above by working hard. The only problem is that these (predominately white middle to upper class) have never had to worry about it. Maybe it worked for their great-grandpappy, but that dream doesn't work now. They could care less about anyone else but their own interests. Don't tell me that they would vote for Biden just because he is a nice old white moderate. That is complete bullshit. They are voting Trump. They did in 2016 and they will in 2020. Dems need to work on getting the disenfranchised and suppressed to the voting booths. Get those that have not had their voices heard in politics to the pull the lever in their favor.Steve of phpBB wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 11:15 amYes, and sadly, their votes count as much as anyone else's. And there's millions of them, and you need them to win. They're the ones who are turned off by Trump's chaos and who gave the Dems their House majority two years ago.duff wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 11:01 amThose are Republicans that won't everyone to believe they have a heart by donating 100$ to the Humane Society not realizing the money is going to drugs to euthanize the animals in the shelter. But it was a good deed, so it out weighs their desire to accumulate as much wealth as possible just so they can have their Lexus and iPhones.
And they generally vote, too, so they will likely either vote for Trump or the Dem. 2018 and the special elections showed that they can be willing to vote for a moderate Dem. But if you drive them into voting for Trump, now you have to get two other votes to make up for it.
To quote both Bruce Prichard and Tony Schiavone, "Fuck Duff Meltzer."
- Steve of phpBB
- The Dude
- Posts: 8663
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:44 am
- Location: Feeling gravity's pull
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
If you have evidence for that, great.duff wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 11:43 amThese people are the ones that voted for Trump in 2016. Don't tell me that they voted for Hillary. No way. All they care about is lining their pockets with more money. They have no other issues they care about. Sure there are a handful of Republicans that abhor abortion and that is their only issue. Some are like that on guns, but most Republicans are more worried about the bottom line. They still live in a world where they believe anyone can rise above by working hard. The only problem is that these (predominately white middle to upper class) have never had to worry about it. Maybe it worked for their great-grandpappy, but that dream doesn't work now. They could care less about anyone else but their own interests. Don't tell me that they would vote for Biden just because he is a nice old white moderate. That is complete bullshit. They are voting Trump. They did in 2016 and they will in 2020. Dems need to work on getting the disenfranchised and suppressed to the voting booths. Get those that have not had their voices heard in politics to the pull the lever in their favor.
Because election results from 2017 through 2018 certainly seem to suggest that a significant number of these folks - who, yes, I agree voted for Trump - have been voting for moderate Democrats since Trump's win. The Dems took every congressional district in Orange County, California. They won a Senate seat in Alabama and held on in Montana. They won the House District just to the south of me.
But like I said, if there is evidence that there's a way to get the disenfranchised to the voting booths without also bringing others out to oppose them, I'd love to see it. Because I would certainly prefer that myself.
And his one problem is he didn’t go to Russia that night because he had extracurricular activities, and they froze to death.
- Nonlinear FC
- The Dude
- Posts: 11075
- Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 2:09 pm
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
Anybody else out there have a weird gut feeling EW might pull some stunners today?
I just find it fucking bizarre that on here, on Facebook, on Pod Save... SO MANY people seem to like her but the polls just don't seem to reflect that anecdotal stuff.
I just find it fucking bizarre that on here, on Facebook, on Pod Save... SO MANY people seem to like her but the polls just don't seem to reflect that anecdotal stuff.
You can lead a horse to fish, but you can't fish out a horse.
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
She was polling neck and neck with Biden as 2nd choice for both Buttigieg and Klobuchar.
-
- The Dude
- Posts: 12036
- Joined: Wed Apr 17, 2013 7:07 pm
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
Feels like wishful thinking. Avowed Warren supporter but I just don't see the traction. It remains puzzling to me.Nonlinear FC wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 11:56 am Anybody else out there have a weird gut feeling EW might pull some stunners today?
I just find it fucking bizarre that on here, on Facebook, on Pod Save... SO MANY people seem to like her but the polls just don't seem to reflect that anecdotal stuff.
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
To be clear, know the 29k figure is false, just like the rest of the "quotes" up there. I'm just indicating the weaponry that has been used against Sanders/Warren as progressive. It's all false. But the media doesn't care because their job is to make sure people stay tuned in and scared about any future that doesn't directly benefit them.Steve of phpBB wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 11:39 amI was referring to something earlier in the thread.
But Sanders' proposals will clearly require tax increases on people other than those making $200K per year. We went through the math a couple of weeks ago.
Forty percent of households make at least $80K. A big chunk (35%?) make at least $100K. So I think the same principle applies unless you limit your increases to the obviously rich, and then see above.
(At any rate, hasn't Sanders proposed an additional tax on all income above $30K or so to pay for M 4 All?)
Dances with Wolves (1) - BSF
"This place was rockin'," said BSF21.
"There is nothing ever uncommon about BSF21."
"This place was rockin'," said BSF21.
"There is nothing ever uncommon about BSF21."
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
Yeah, I’d be surprised if she even finishes top-2 in any state other than Massachusetts.tennbengal wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 11:59 amFeels like wishful thinking. Avowed Warren supporter but I just don't see the traction. It remains puzzling to me.Nonlinear FC wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 11:56 am Anybody else out there have a weird gut feeling EW might pull some stunners today?
I just find it fucking bizarre that on here, on Facebook, on Pod Save... SO MANY people seem to like her but the polls just don't seem to reflect that anecdotal stuff.
- govmentchedda
- The Dude
- Posts: 12867
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 4:36 pm
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
Sadly, I don't feel this way, but I'd love it.Nonlinear FC wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 11:56 am Anybody else out there have a weird gut feeling EW might pull some stunners today?
I just find it fucking bizarre that on here, on Facebook, on Pod Save... SO MANY people seem to like her but the polls just don't seem to reflect that anecdotal stuff.
Until everything is less insane, I'm mixing weed with wine.
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
I think they timed everything perfectly to not allow anyone who wasn't expecting this to take advantage. If it were Super Friday, I think she might have been able to capitalize.
- degenerasian
- The Dude
- Posts: 12394
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:22 pm
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
Nonlinear FC wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 11:56 am Anybody else out there have a weird gut feeling EW might pull some stunners today?
I just find it fucking bizarre that on here, on Facebook, on Pod Save... SO MANY people seem to like her but the polls just don't seem to reflect that anecdotal stuff.
We are in a bubble on here.
It's been analyzed as, she's won a lot of 'grass-top' support but not really 'grass-roots' support. So people on twitter or facebook or podcasts or on forums like ours who have a voice proclaim our support for her, and it might seem like SO MANY people. But in reality, the masses who don't have a voice, they're not buying it. And she's getting worse and worse.
Kung Fu movies are like porn. There's 1 on 1, then 2 on 1, then a group scene..
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
Yup. My Facebook friends who went to fancy colleges and universities absolutely love her. Like I said, based on my own social network, you’d assume Warren and Pete were running away with it. But she’s never gotten traction with minority or working class voters.degenerasian wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 12:06 pmNonlinear FC wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 11:56 am Anybody else out there have a weird gut feeling EW might pull some stunners today?
I just find it fucking bizarre that on here, on Facebook, on Pod Save... SO MANY people seem to like her but the polls just don't seem to reflect that anecdotal stuff.
We are in a bubble on here.
It's been analyzed as, she's won a lot of 'grass-top' support but not really 'grass-roots' support. So people on twitter or facebook or podcasts or on forums like ours who have a voice proclaim our support for her, and it might seem like SO MANY people. But in reality, the masses who don't have a voice, they're not buying it. And she's getting worse and worse.
- Nonlinear FC
- The Dude
- Posts: 11075
- Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 2:09 pm
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
Good points, all.
Just seems a damn shame.
Just seems a damn shame.
You can lead a horse to fish, but you can't fish out a horse.
- Steve of phpBB
- The Dude
- Posts: 8663
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:44 am
- Location: Feeling gravity's pull
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
Sanders' own website talks about a 4 percent tax on all income above $29K. Unless they're fake sites.BSF21 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 12:02 pmTo be clear, know the 29k figure is false, just like the rest of the "quotes" up there. I'm just indicating the weaponry that has been used against Sanders/Warren as progressive. It's all false. But the media doesn't care because their job is to make sure people stay tuned in and scared about any future that doesn't directly benefit them.Steve of phpBB wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 11:39 amI was referring to something earlier in the thread.
But Sanders' proposals will clearly require tax increases on people other than those making $200K per year. We went through the math a couple of weeks ago.
Forty percent of households make at least $80K. A big chunk (35%?) make at least $100K. So I think the same principle applies unless you limit your increases to the obviously rich, and then see above.
(At any rate, hasn't Sanders proposed an additional tax on all income above $30K or so to pay for M 4 All?)
And his one problem is he didn’t go to Russia that night because he had extracurricular activities, and they froze to death.
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
Did you see that ludicrous display last night?
- Steve of phpBB
- The Dude
- Posts: 8663
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:44 am
- Location: Feeling gravity's pull
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
Define "pay". Their employers pay. But it doesn't get taken out of their salary.
Someone who is paid "$65,000 per year plus benefits" doesn't really "pay" for health insurance except theoretically.
And his one problem is he didn’t go to Russia that night because he had extracurricular activities, and they froze to death.
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
Are you talking about people whose employers pay 100% of their insurance? Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't think that at all the norm here. "Salary plus benefits" just means they offer health care, not that they fully cover it.
- Steve of phpBB
- The Dude
- Posts: 8663
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:44 am
- Location: Feeling gravity's pull
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
That's a good point. I keep extrapolating from my firm's practice, where the employees pay a pittance towards their premiums, an amount that hasn't changed in at least 25 years.
I guess the most accurate answer is, "Some do and some don't, and those that do pay different amounts."
And his one problem is he didn’t go to Russia that night because he had extracurricular activities, and they froze to death.
- degenerasian
- The Dude
- Posts: 12394
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:22 pm
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
I also think with less people in the race, the Phoenix debate on March 15 will be very interesting. If Warren is still in it, who does she attack?
I would like that to be a one-on-one Biden vs Bernie debate where both have to defend their positions.
I would like that to be a one-on-one Biden vs Bernie debate where both have to defend their positions.
Kung Fu movies are like porn. There's 1 on 1, then 2 on 1, then a group scene..
-
- The Dude
- Posts: 12036
- Joined: Wed Apr 17, 2013 7:07 pm
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
I pay $1200 a month as an employee toward health insurance for my family with my employer paying whatever it is they pay. And then co-pays and deductibles on top of that. Most people pay way more than a pittance as it stands even with employer provided health insurance...Steve of phpBB wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 1:14 pmThat's a good point. I keep extrapolating from my firm's practice, where the employees pay a pittance towards their premiums, an amount that hasn't changed in at least 25 years.
I guess the most accurate answer is, "Some do and some don't, and those that do pay different amounts."
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
So the only way that $60K family is losing here is if they pay less than $200 per month with zero co-pays or out of pocket expenses.
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
In MA, we actually did have a full coverage plan through my wife and it was amazing. I think I mentioned many pages ago the cost of birth one was $17 there versus the cost of birth two being >$17K here.
Re: 2020: The Democratic Presidential Nomination Thread
Wooooow. Texas Pete isn't the best hot sauce, but it's surely spicier than the alternative:
mister d wrote:Couldn't have pegged me better.
EnochRoot wrote:I mean, whatever. Johnnie's all hot cuz I ride him.