Page 9 of 11

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:42 pm
by Pruitt
Strange and completely dated short about a New York boxer. But it is one of Stanley Kubrick's first works...


Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2019 12:37 pm
by sancarlos
That was good. Boxing was so popular back then, and it's a damned shame that the mob controlled much of boxing in that era.

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2019 11:39 pm
by Pruitt
That Bud Crawford-Amir Khan card was garbage. Couple of typical mismatches with young up and coming Top Rank stars against veterans with no power followed by Amir Khan quitting after a low blow in the 5th round. He could have continued, but was getting shellacked.

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Sat May 04, 2019 11:47 pm
by Pruitt
Alvarez-Jacobs as a decent fight between two good boxers.

I scored it 115-113 Alvarez, similar to the Judges.

But holy shit, Brian Kenny the announcer somehow called this fight with Alvarez's dick in his mouth. As early as the 2nd round, he made it sound like Alvarez was crushing Jacobs. Guess this is what happens when a drone like Kenny is paid to call the network's golden boy.

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Sat Jun 01, 2019 10:21 pm
by Pruitt
Just saw the greatest upset since Douglas-Tyson... could even have been a bigger shock.

You have to watch the Anthony Joshua-Andy Ruiz Jr. fight. It's as if a fat Rocky pummelled Apollo Creed into submission. Unreal.

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Sat Jun 01, 2019 10:56 pm
by brian
Rules.


Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 4:52 am
by Johnnie
While it lasts:






Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 6:01 am
by Square Rob
Thanks for posting Johnnie, that was awesome.

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:20 am
by wlu_lax6

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Sun Nov 03, 2019 1:05 am
by Pruitt
So Kovalev may be a bit past his prime, but I had him slightly ahead in that fight.

But Canelo really is an amazing boxer. Never really liked him, but man, that was amazing.

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Sun Nov 03, 2019 10:13 am
by degenerasian
Pruitt wrote: Sun Nov 03, 2019 1:05 am So Kovalev may be a bit past his prime, but I had him slightly ahead in that fight.

But Canelo really is an amazing boxer. Never really liked him, but man, that was amazing.
Think he was ahead? It seemed so strange that the taller, bigger man was defending the entire fight.

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Sun Nov 03, 2019 7:57 pm
by Pruitt
degenerasian wrote: Sun Nov 03, 2019 10:13 am
Pruitt wrote: Sun Nov 03, 2019 1:05 am So Kovalev may be a bit past his prime, but I had him slightly ahead in that fight.

But Canelo really is an amazing boxer. Never really liked him, but man, that was amazing.
Think he was ahead? It seemed so strange that the taller, bigger man was defending the entire fight.
Just slightly ahead. I had him winning 4 of the first 5 by virtue of the fact that he was jabbing Canelo back. But it became pretty clear that the Jab was all he had.

Brilliant fight by Canelo.

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2019 10:12 pm
by Pruitt
39 years ago...

I was at Maple LEaf Gardens watching this on the big screen.

Long time ago.


Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2019 11:08 pm
by degenerasian
Having the legendary Claude Mouton announce the results in two languages threw everyone for a loop.

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2019 1:34 pm
by Pruitt
Buster Douglas the 2nd?

Ruiz is 15 pounds heavier than for the last fight with Joseph.

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2019 6:37 pm
by Pruitt
And that should be the last we see of Andy Ruiz.

And Deontay Wilder may actually kill Anthony Joshua if they ever fight.

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 1:56 pm
by degenerasian
30 years ago today, the knockout heard around the world.


Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 3:43 pm
by Pruitt
Watched it the next day, and even though I knew the outcome, it was still shocking.

Douglas should have been way ahead on the scorecards, but one judge had it even, one had Tyson up by a point and one had Douglas up by six points.

Tyson really is one of the most overrated athletes of my lifetime.

Not that he wasn't good, but he's not even one of the top 5 heavyweights of my lifetime.

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 5:31 pm
by L-Jam3
I remember that fight clearly. I don't know if I'd go as far to say that Tyson was overrated, but the most charitable way to describe his chin was "suspect".

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 6:39 pm
by Pruitt
L-Jam3 wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 5:31 pm I remember that fight clearly. I don't know if I'd go as far to say that Tyson was overrated, but the most charitable way to describe his chin was "suspect".
Yeah, but I'm comparing him to Ali, Frazier, Holmes, Norton, Holyfield, Lewis even Klitschko.

He couldn;t have beaten any of these guys.

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 6:45 pm
by L-Jam3
Vitali would beat Tyson, but I'm not sure about Wladimir.

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:02 pm
by Giff
I was 13, in Waco visiting family and remember that day pretty clearly. I alternated between the dunk contest (not realizing the little PG from the Kings who should've won would soon have a permanent place in my sports heart) and the fight. Got to hear my uncle yell a racial slur as Tyson was getting counted out. Watched The Day After after.

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:13 pm
by Pruitt
L-Jam3 wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 6:45 pm Vitali would beat Tyson, but I'm not sure about Wladimir.
Yes. Agree.

Riddick Bowe with his head on straight might have beaten Tyson as well.

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2020 12:42 am
by Pruitt
Tyson Fucking Fury.

Wow!

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Tue Feb 25, 2020 7:21 am
by Pruitt

Deontay Wilder blames knockout loss to Tyson Fury on heavy ring-walk costume

“It weighed 40 pounds with the helmet and all the batteries. I wanted my tribute to be great for Black History Month … and I guess I put that before anything.”
?????

Image

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2020 4:10 pm
by L-Jam3
ESPN is rebroadcasting memorable fights tonight, starting with The Rumble In The Jungle and The Thrilla In Manila at 7 pm.

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2020 4:29 pm
by govmentchedda
L-Jam3 wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 4:10 pm ESPN is rebroadcasting memorable fights tonight, starting with The Rumble In The Jungle and The Thrilla In Manila at 7 pm.
Thanks for the heads up. Looks like they're running old Tyson fights after that as well, although the run time for most of them is much shorter than the Rumble and Thrilla.

It looks like it's on ESPN2, not ESPN, if you're interested in recording it.

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2020 5:30 pm
by sancarlos
Pruitt wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 3:43 pm Tyson really is one of the most overrated athletes of my lifetime.

Not that he wasn't good, but he's not even one of the top 5 heavyweights of my lifetime.
Just catching up on this thread. Pruitt, your take is reasonable with the benefit of hindsight, but surely you remember what Tyson had been up until that point (and, why he was rated so highly). He regularly knocked out all the other top heavyweights in the first round. I saw Ali, Frazier and Foreman at their peaks, but none of them matched the ferocity and menace of the 1980s Tyson. He was a scary sight to behold. So, at that time, many seasoned, respected observers thought they were witnessing an athlete whose boxing reputation would be on par with all the greats. Thus, the immense shock everybody felt when he lost to Douglas.

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:36 pm
by Pruitt
Oh absolutely, my opinion is based on hindsight.

I'll never forget seeing Michael Spinks (who was a hell of a good fighter) basically faint as the fight started. Tyson was a beast... but if you look at his record, other than Spinks, Bruno and (I guess) Ruddock and Tucker, he never beat any good fighters in their prime.

And the great fighters he faced - Holyfield and Lewis - made him look like a club fighter.

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2020 8:18 pm
by govmentchedda
This place could really use Doc Howard again.

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2020 8:36 pm
by A_B
It’s Ken Griffey jr. he was supposed to beat all the records. He didn’t but he was still fucking amazing.

And wait: you’re saying Holyfield was greater than Tyson? That doesn’t fit my ear.

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2020 11:58 pm
by Pruitt
Great fight tonight - Lomachenko/Lopez

Right guy got the decision as well.
[+] spoiler
Although 119-109 Lopez is an outrageous scorecard. I had it 116-112

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2020 12:11 am
by Square Rob
We leaned Lopez, but I would have been happy with a draw. Objectively anyway, as I had money on Lopez. Felt fair anyway. Loma waited far too long to start throwing anything.

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2020 7:16 am
by Pruitt
Yeah, Lomachenko was a bit too cagey early on.

Would definitely watch a rematch... but will pray that Joe Tessitore doesn't call the fight. He's fine once the action starts, but his hype levels know no bounds. He was talking about this fight as though it were Ali-Frazier, VE Day and the Second Coming all rolled into one.

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2020 8:59 am
by BSF21
Square Rob wrote: Sun Oct 18, 2020 12:11 am We leaned Lopez, but I would have been happy with a draw. Objectively anyway, as I had money on Lopez. Felt fair anyway. Loma waited far too long to start throwing anything.
I bet loma kinda heavy and regret it. Took him to win by KO/TKO and the fight to not go the distance. Didn’t like what I saw early, then backed it up again in the 7th when Loma started to really fire and I got better odds.

Oh well. 119 - 109 is a tragedy. I didn’t disagree with the decision but what fight was she watching? Just American bias or?

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2020 11:07 pm
by govmentchedda
Seems like a bullshit call here in Vegas.

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2020 11:15 pm
by A_B
govmentchedda wrote: Sat Nov 14, 2020 11:07 pm Seems like a bullshit call here in Vegas.
Is there big fight tonight?

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2020 11:20 pm
by govmentchedda
A_B wrote: Sat Nov 14, 2020 11:15 pm
govmentchedda wrote: Sat Nov 14, 2020 11:07 pm Seems like a bullshit call here in Vegas.
Is there big fight tonight?
Tessitore told me Terence Bud Crawford was the best pound for pound. Undercard fight just spent 30 minutes looking for an accidental headbutt. Fucking boring.

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 11:51 am
by Pruitt
govmentchedda wrote: Sat Nov 14, 2020 11:20 pm
A_B wrote: Sat Nov 14, 2020 11:15 pm
govmentchedda wrote: Sat Nov 14, 2020 11:07 pm Seems like a bullshit call here in Vegas.
Is there big fight tonight?
Tessitore told me Terence Bud Crawford was the best pound for pound. Undercard fight just spent 30 minutes looking for an accidental headbutt. Fucking boring.
Glad I recorded it.

Russell Mora is a notoriously terrible ref. How some of these guys keep getting big fights is beyond me.

Bud Crawford is tremendous. But Tessitore just needs to shut up.

I do like ESPN's experts - Tim Bradley and Andre Ward.

Re: The Sweet Science

Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2020 9:28 pm
by Johnnie
You guys gonna watch Tyson v Jones Jr?

The undercard stuff is happening now.

http://crackstreams.com/boxing-streams/