The Swamp

Posted: **Sun Jan 08, 2017 8:49 pm**

Pats are -16, jeez

Posted: **Sun Jan 08, 2017 9:01 pm**

I wonder if the Patriot Nation ever gets tired of winning.

Posted: **Sun Jan 08, 2017 9:54 pm**

LewP wrote:I wonder if the Patriot Nation ever gets tired of winning.

Well they really didn't win much the first 41 years (I was a fan for 15ish of that) so I'm not minding it.

Posted: **Sun Jan 08, 2017 10:08 pm**

Probably not tired of it. But definitely take it for granted.

Posted: **Sun Jan 08, 2017 10:53 pm**

Eh, I'm not that worried about the Texans. A bit more worried about the Chiefs or Steelers.

Posted: **Sun Jan 08, 2017 11:00 pm**

degenerasian wrote:Pats are -16, jeez

Yahoo says it's the 3rd biggest playoff spread in history.

Texans defence is pretty good though, right?

Posted: **Sun Jan 08, 2017 11:21 pm**

Pruitt wrote:Texans defence is pretty good though, right?

J.J. Watt is not walking through that door.

Posted: **Sun Jan 08, 2017 11:40 pm**

sancarlos wrote:
Pruitt wrote:Texans defence is pretty good though, right?
J.J. Watt is not walking through that door.

But the cameras will be on him whether he tries or not.

Posted: **Sun Jan 08, 2017 11:47 pm**

Largest postseason spreads ever:

Super Bowl XXIX, 1994 season, 49ers -19 vs. Chargers
Super Bowl III, 1968 season, Colts -18 vs. Jets
1998 Divisional, Vikings -16.5 vs. Cardinals
2016 Divisional, Pats -16 vs. Texans
1994 Divisional, 49ers -15.5 vs. Bears
1978 Divisional, Cowboys -15 vs. Falcons

Jets won, Atlanta covered.

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2017 10:04 am**

Johnnie wrote:
sancarlos wrote:
Pruitt wrote:Texans defence is pretty good though, right?
J.J. Watt is not walking through that door.
But the cameras will be on him whether he tries or not.

I'll take solace on Saturday night that this will annoy you to know end. That's all I'll have.

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2017 10:10 am**

Patricia/Watt drinking game?

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2017 10:16 am**

LewP wrote:I wonder if the Patriot Nation ever gets tired of winning.

There are week when I'm tired of the losing, tbh

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2017 11:15 am**

Giff wrote:
Johnnie wrote:
sancarlos wrote:
Pruitt wrote:Texans defence is pretty good though, right?
J.J. Watt is not walking through that door.
But the cameras will be on him whether he tries or not.
I'll take solace on Saturday night that this will annoy you to know end. That's all I'll have.

He looks like me (according to Jerloma). He has my initials. And he lives in a log cabin the way I did in Germany. He's copying me. The bastard.

Posted: **Fri Jan 13, 2017 3:15 pm**

PIT/KC game moved to prime time (8:20PM kickoff) because of the weather. NBC must be devastated (though good thing the Golden Globes aren't this weekend).

I had another track meet to attend, so this is OK with me.

Posted: **Fri Jan 13, 2017 3:22 pm**

rass wrote:PIT/KC game moved to prime time (8:20PM kickoff) because of the weather. NBC must be devastated (though good thing the Golden Globes aren't this weekend).

I had another track meet to attend, so this is OK with me.

Me too. Not to mention Monday being a holiday.

Posted: **Fri Jan 13, 2017 3:23 pm**

Johnnie wrote:
Giff wrote:
Johnnie wrote:
sancarlos wrote:
Pruitt wrote:Texans defence is pretty good though, right?
J.J. Watt is not walking through that door.
But the cameras will be on him whether he tries or not.
I'll take solace on Saturday night that this will annoy you to know end. That's all I'll have.
He looks like me (according to Jerloma). He has my initials. And he lives in a log cabin the way I did in Germany. He's copying me. The bastard.

Wait. What?

Posted: **Fri Jan 13, 2017 3:39 pm**

John Wondello. Don't know his name?

Posted: **Fri Jan 13, 2017 3:42 pm**

Johnnie Johnnie W.

Posted: **Fri Jan 13, 2017 3:43 pm**

brian wrote:John Wondello. Don't know his name?

That's what I'm saying!

Posted: **Fri Jan 13, 2017 3:52 pm**

Bet on the Pats and may put a few bucks on Pittsburgh.

16 points is a massive amount, but the Pats have given up 87 points in 7 games. I bet we see Garafalo in this one.

Posted: **Fri Jan 13, 2017 3:57 pm**

forecasts have backed off for the KC metro in terms of ice on Saturday/Sunday. consider me in the camp of wondering just how much TV ratings for a Sunday night playoff game played into the decision to move Steelers-Chiefs.

Posted: **Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:10 pm**

Boy you really laid an egg with that one!

Posted: **Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:17 pm**

Luv NFL football gametes.

Posted: **Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:20 pm**

Antonio Cromartie wrote:You and me both.

Posted: **Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:23 pm**

tweetdeck has the weirdest autocorrects and they always happen when you're not paying attention

Posted: **Fri Jan 13, 2017 7:25 pm**

A_B wrote:
brian wrote:John Wondello. Don't know his name?
That's what I'm saying!

My middle name begins with J. That's what I was meaning.

Posted: **Fri Jan 13, 2017 7:42 pm**

Pruitt wrote:Bet on the Pats and may put a few bucks on Pittsburgh.

16 points is a massive amount, but the Pats have given up 87 points in 7 games. I bet we see Garafalo in this one.

Scary thing is the actual Janeane Garafalo could start at QB and the Pats would still be an 8 point favorite.

Posted: **Sat Jan 14, 2017 11:10 am**

GoodKarma wrote:
Pruitt wrote:Bet on the Pats and may put a few bucks on Pittsburgh.

16 points is a massive amount, but the Pats have given up 87 points in 7 games. I bet we see Garafalo in this one.
Scary thing is the actual Janeane Garafalo could start at QB and the Pats would still be an 8 point favorite.

I would take the Pats giving 10 or even 13 points, but 16 seems a bit too high to me. I could easily see something like a 24-10 result where New England dominates the game, is up 24-3 late and Houston scored a garbage time TD to cover. And in the unlikely event that Houston's offense actually plays well, they'll easily cover 16.

I have no idea what to think about the KC-Pittsburgh game. I think the Steelers are the better team but KC has the home field and Andy Reid's ridiculous record coming off a bye working for them.

Posted: **Sat Jan 14, 2017 11:54 am**

Texans by 4.

Posted: **Sat Jan 14, 2017 12:20 pm**

Joe K wrote:I have no idea what to think about the KC-Pittsburgh game. I think the Steelers are the better team but KC has the home field and Andy Reid's ridiculous record coming off a bye working for them.

Steelers were 5-3 on the road, but have won their last four... over CLE, IND, BUF, CIN. Roethlisberger splits this year with MIA as only playoff team they played on the road (KC, NE, DAL, NYG were all at home):

HOME: 70.8% completion rate, 8.47 yds/att, 20 TD, 5 INT
AWAY: 59.4% completion rate, 6.73 yds/att, 9 TD, 8 INT

I'm not a big fan of KC or Reid, but the pass game home/road differences for Roethlisberger make me lean to them.

Posted: **Sat Jan 14, 2017 1:19 pm**

I'll make some imaginary Swampbuck bets on the Chiefs and the Patriots. But, I will be rooting hard for the Texans. How awesome (albeit unlikely) would it be for Brock Osweiler to have his breakout game to lead them to a victory? Yeh, I know. That ain't gonna happen.

Posted: **Sat Jan 14, 2017 1:44 pm**

A_B wrote:Texans by 4.

Oh please, please, please baby Jesus....

Posted: **Sat Jan 14, 2017 8:06 pm**

Who was that homeless guy in the tunnel giving daps when the Pats were being shown?

Posted: **Sat Jan 14, 2017 8:13 pm**

Johnnie wrote:Who was that homeless guy in the tunnel giving daps when the Pats were being shown?

I saw that. It was great. He looked like Rob Ryan after a hard night of drinking.

Posted: **Sat Jan 14, 2017 8:33 pm**

Brian Cushing is a cunt.

Edit:

Here's a reverse gif of him puking:

Posted: **Sat Jan 14, 2017 8:49 pm**

Posted: **Sat Jan 14, 2017 9:10 pm**

I guess if I could combine the pic and gif I just posted and post that, I would.

Posted: **Sat Jan 14, 2017 10:06 pm**

How do you miss a blatant illegal procedure on a guy going full cfl?

Posted: **Sat Jan 14, 2017 10:20 pm**

NFL quarterbacks are really good when they have 12 seconds to throw.

Posted: **Sat Jan 14, 2017 10:35 pm**

Good grief CBS. Waiting for a frightened Steve Tasker to bring order here.

The Swamp

2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs

Re: 2017 AFC Playoffs