Page 23 of 32

Re: Twitter

Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2019 9:41 am
by A_B
Anyone ever block a random person just because of their interaction with someone else you follow? Almost 100% chance they'd never interact with me at all, but I don't want to risk it. Anyway I've done it a few times.

Re: Twitter

Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2019 10:03 am
by Joe K
A_B wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2019 9:41 am Anyone ever block a random person just because of their interaction with someone else you follow? Almost 100% chance they'd never interact with me at all, but I don't want to risk it. Anyway I've done it a few times.
I do this all the time, even though I never post anything on Twitter and only use it as an information/humor source and don’t interact with anyone. Overuse of a tired meme or gif is a common blockworthy offense for me. Don’t go bringing a Simpsons meme or Jonah Hill gif onto my timeline unless your content is really good!

Re: Twitter

Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2019 11:36 am
by Shirley
Shirley wrote: Sat Jul 20, 2019 3:56 pm
Rex wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2019 9:42 pm Sounds like a good Swamp bragging topic: what’s your best Twitter interaction? I got a like from Jim Everett once (and it was not a tweet about him). Bronto doesn’t get to play this game.
Ralph Sampson retweeted me a couple of years ago. I'm not gonna top that.
He liked a tweet of mine a few days ago as well.

Re: Twitter

Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2019 11:44 am
by A_B
Shirley wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2019 11:36 am
Shirley wrote: Sat Jul 20, 2019 3:56 pm
Rex wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2019 9:42 pm Sounds like a good Swamp bragging topic: what’s your best Twitter interaction? I got a like from Jim Everett once (and it was not a tweet about him). Bronto doesn’t get to play this game.
Ralph Sampson retweeted me a couple of years ago. I'm not gonna top that.
He liked a tweet of mine a few days ago as well.
So obviously it's all been downhill.

Re: Twitter

Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2019 8:26 am
by Johnnie
Fucking Marines.


Re: Twitter

Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2019 4:33 pm
by brian
This is the Content I expect from Twitter.


Re: Twitter

Posted: Fri Sep 20, 2019 10:02 pm
by Pruitt

Re: Twitter

Posted: Fri Sep 20, 2019 10:10 pm
by sancarlos
Don't read the comments.
Pruitt wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2019 10:02 pm

Re: Twitter

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2019 10:12 am
by DaveInSeattle
From yesterday's Climate change march here in Seattle:



But wait..there's more...


Re: Twitter

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2019 10:13 am
by DaveInSeattle
sancarlos wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2019 10:10 pm Don't read the comments.
Words to live by...

Re: Twitter

Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2019 6:31 am
by Pruitt
Image

Re: Twitter

Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2019 7:28 pm
by Rex


“pornhub.com/insights”

Re: Twitter

Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2019 8:44 pm
by Johnnie
Not the least bit shocking that the racist Dixieland states want to watch interracial porn. I just figured they'd be more into the opposite with cuckholding.

ETA:

Yo! Giantess porn is wild! That was not what I expected. I was thinking more Amazon stuff, but no. It's like if the woman is the size of Godzilla and you're just a little dude trying to fuck her.

Re: Twitter

Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2019 9:03 pm
by The Sybian
Johnnie wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2019 8:44 pm Not the least bit shocking that the racist Dixieland states want to watch interracial porn. I just figured they'd be more into the opposite with cuckholding.

ETA:

Yo! Giantess porn is wild! That was not what I expected. I was thinking more Amazon stuff, but no. It's like if the woman is the size of Godzilla and you're just a little dude trying to fuck her.
Off to the Pornhub!

Re: Twitter

Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2019 1:39 pm
by brian
Replies to this are awesome:


Re: Twitter

Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2019 2:12 pm
by Steve of phpBB
brian wrote: Wed Oct 09, 2019 1:39 pm Replies to this are awesome:

I'm probably richer than 90-95% of the people in America, and I've never spent $60K on a car. Or two cars.

Re: Twitter

Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2019 2:13 pm
by A_B
Humblebrag much?!?!?!?


(I have three cars and total their purchase price is not $60k.Nor, obviously, did I pay cash for them, as this suggests.)

Re: Twitter

Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2019 2:20 pm
by sancarlos
Like you guys, i too have spent less than $60k on the combined prices of my two cars. I've never believed in spending much on cars, for the reason given - it is a bad investment.

But, the meme is a bit silly in that it suggests that rich people don't buy expensive cars. We all know that isn't true.

Re: Twitter

Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2019 2:27 pm
by mister d
If poor people just saved $60K they don't have and also went without transportation, they'd be rich. I see no errors.

Re: Twitter

Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2019 2:36 pm
by Steve of phpBB
mister d wrote: Wed Oct 09, 2019 2:27 pm If poor people just saved $60K they don't have and also went without transportation, they'd be rich. I see no errors.
And invested it in a vehicle with a guaranteed ten percent annual rate of return.

(Has that tweet been deleted?)

Re: Twitter

Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2019 2:57 pm
by The Sybian
Steve of phpBB wrote: Wed Oct 09, 2019 2:36 pm

(Has that tweet been deleted?)
Yes. Who posted, and what did it say? I'm intrigued and want an excuse to convince my wife to let me get a Tesla. Eh, I can't justify the expense to myself, either...

Re: Twitter

Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2019 3:14 pm
by brian
Guess the guy was tired of getting dunked on. I should have just screenshotted it.

Re: Twitter

Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2019 3:34 pm
by Steve of phpBB
The Sybian wrote: Wed Oct 09, 2019 2:57 pm
Steve of phpBB wrote: Wed Oct 09, 2019 2:36 pm

(Has that tweet been deleted?)
Yes. Who posted, and what did it say? I'm intrigued and want an excuse to convince my wife to let me get a Tesla. Eh, I can't justify the expense to myself, either...
The gist was "one reason why consumers are broke and investors are rich," and it compared buying a $60K car, with annual depreciation of fifteen percent, and investing that $60K at a ten percent rate of return. Completely ignoring that (i) almost everyone needs a car anyway, (ii) no "middle class" person buys a $60K car, and (iii) you can't get a ten percent return from any safe investment.

Re: Twitter

Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2019 3:37 pm
by mister d
(iv) The graphic of the $60K car was of a Honda Civic or something.



(Anyone else pass on jokes because you don't believe people will know you were joking, like me wanting to label this (iiii)?)

Re: Twitter

Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2019 2:19 pm
by Johnnie

Re: Twitter

Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2019 2:38 pm
by mister d


If Trump gets a US soldier killed, is that as big of a deal as it sounds or nah just like everything else?

Re: Twitter

Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2019 2:39 pm
by sancarlos
The NBA is deservedly getting kicked around on Twitter, but it seems that Google and Disney and other businesses are largely getting a pass on this (other than from South Park).

Re: Twitter

Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2019 3:00 pm
by Johnnie
I would like to think that the blood of dead military members would move the needle, but time and again we're reminded that we're expendable and we signed up for this, so I doubt it.

Buuuut... With this Syria/Turkey thing and reports of military members feeling betrayed plus an Atlantic piece about retired generals going in on Trump, I can hope.

Re: Twitter

Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2019 3:10 pm
by Steve of phpBB
mister d wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2019 2:38 pmIf Trump gets a US soldier killed, is that as big of a deal as it sounds or nah just like everything else?
On the one hand, maybe it should be a big deal. On the other hand, hasn't every president gotten US soldiers killed?

Re: Twitter

Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2019 4:01 pm
by Pruitt
Steve of phpBB wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2019 3:10 pm
mister d wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2019 2:38 pmIf Trump gets a US soldier killed, is that as big of a deal as it sounds or nah just like everything else?
On the one hand, maybe it should be a big deal. On the other hand, hasn't every president gotten US soldiers killed?
Sadly brilliant.

Re: Twitter

Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2019 7:04 pm
by DaveInSeattle
In honor of National Coming Out Day, this hilarious thread was posted ...


Re: Twitter

Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2019 7:08 pm
by Pruitt
The *president retweeted this.

I have no idea what it means.


Re: Twitter

Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2019 11:28 pm
by govmentchedda
DaveInSeattle wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2019 7:04 pm In honor of National Coming Out Day, this hilarious thread was posted ...

Hilarious

Re: Twitter

Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2019 11:55 am
by Johnnie
Yup, basically. Being raised by Boomers led to a lot of overactive idiots imparting unreal expectations during my childhood too!


Re: Twitter

Posted: Tue Oct 22, 2019 11:34 am
by brian
Are we sure Jason Isbell doesn't lurk here?


Re: Twitter

Posted: Thu Oct 24, 2019 8:51 am
by rass

Re: Twitter

Posted: Thu Oct 24, 2019 9:27 am
by Pruitt
rass wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2019 8:51 am
When subtext is brought to the fore.

Re: Twitter

Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2019 9:29 pm
by Johnnie
This shit is hysterical:

(Dude deleted the tweet.)

Image



From his bio: "Father of 9, Army veteran, marathon runner, NRA, member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints"

Shocking such a moronic comment would come from a guy like that. Ok, Boomer.

Re: Twitter

Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2019 9:39 pm
by EnochRoot
Johnnie wrote: Mon Nov 04, 2019 9:29 pm This shit is hysterical:

(Dude deleted the tweet.)

Image



From his bio: "Father of 9, Army veteran, marathon runner, NRA, member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints"

Shocking such a moronic comment would come from a guy like that. Ok, Boomer.
Still trying to plot the Boomer age bracket, eh..

Re: Twitter

Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2019 9:42 pm
by Johnnie
Only a Boomer doesn't understand memes.

ETA

And not for fucking nothing:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Lonsberry

Look at when he was born. You fuck.