Re: Ridiculous Things You Read On Facebook
Posted: Thu May 04, 2017 8:35 am
I bet there are absolutely some books banned somewhere because they portray being racist in a negative light
It's the sixth version of The Swamp. What could possibly go wrong?
http://www.sportsfrog.net/phpbb/
He said that John was just making his observations about NY and the people that lived there didn't like it.Shirley wrote:Hmm, I must have remembered the John Rocker "nigger" story wrong.bfj wrote:Regarding the Adam Jones treatment.
They paid for their ticket ... Jones just needs to grow up and be a man. He's getting millions to take any fan abuse hurled at him. Where was the commissioner during the Marlins World Series run when they played the cubs and got verbally abused. Or where was the outrage when Atlanta Braves pitcher John Rocker was being verbally abused by those NY fans ... double standards in a now Politically Correct world .
I came to the same conclusion when I nuked my profile.brian wrote:Went through my Facebook posts to hide most of the public posts since I'm applying for a couple of new jobs and didn't realize how banal most of the shit I post is. (Though it was worse years ago. That was not fun going through seven years worth of shit.)
I wonder if potential employers would worry about someone like me since I'm not on Facebook. And while I'm on Twitter, I don't use my real name on it so I can easily deny having one. I think the only social media associated with my real name is LinkedIn, and I don't do much with that, either.brian wrote:Went through my Facebook posts to hide most of the public posts since I'm applying for a couple of new jobs and didn't realize how banal most of the shit I post is. (Though it was worse years ago. That was not fun going through seven years worth of shit.)
Eh, I wouldn't read too much into it. I'm just being super careful in case someone decides to look me up. I left public the posts of dog pictures and whatnot so as to appear as American as apple pie.Sabo wrote:I wonder if potential employers would worry about someone like me since I'm not on Facebook. And while I'm on Twitter, I don't use my real name on it so I can easily deny having one. I think the only social media associated with my real name is LinkedIn, and I don't do much with that, either.brian wrote:Went through my Facebook posts to hide most of the public posts since I'm applying for a couple of new jobs and didn't realize how banal most of the shit I post is. (Though it was worse years ago. That was not fun going through seven years worth of shit.)
So, would not being on social media come across as being anti-social or just protective?
I promise I won't post a picture of the Che Guevara flag you had outside your cubicle almost 20 years ago. (Damn ... hard to believe my time in Ann Arbor was that freaking long ago).brian wrote:Eh, I wouldn't read too much into it. I'm just being super careful in case someone decides to look me up. I left public the posts of dog pictures and whatnot so as to appear as American as apple pie.Sabo wrote:I wonder if potential employers would worry about someone like me since I'm not on Facebook. And while I'm on Twitter, I don't use my real name on it so I can easily deny having one. I think the only social media associated with my real name is LinkedIn, and I don't do much with that, either.brian wrote:Went through my Facebook posts to hide most of the public posts since I'm applying for a couple of new jobs and didn't realize how banal most of the shit I post is. (Though it was worse years ago. That was not fun going through seven years worth of shit.)
So, would not being on social media come across as being anti-social or just protective?
You mean the article by "renowned psychiatrist" Keith Ablow? I saw that in my feed and had to read the article. Ablow writes on a 4th great level explaining how Trump isn't mentally ill, but brilliant. I'm convinced.Giff wrote:The sister I like cannot help but send me screenshots of the shit our mother shares on Facebook. It's not good to do that after I've been drinking since 4:00 knowing I wasn't going to have to drive anywhere. I made some outlandish responses to her shit before deleting the majority of the comments. I had to keep my comment on the post calling Trump the most brilliant president ever. I have to be adopted.
I'll adopt you.Giff wrote:The sister I like cannot help but send me screenshots of the shit our mother shares on Facebook. It's not good to do that after I've been drinking since 4:00 knowing I wasn't going to have to drive anywhere. I made some outlandish responses to her shit before deleting the majority of the comments. I had to keep my comment on the post calling Trump the most brilliant president ever. I have to be adopted.
Suck handsome young men and beautiful young ladies!!
Never once mistook it for a trans-bashing or trans-dismissive song. To me it always meant "there's many ways to live life".Jerloma wrote:Student union apologizes for using trans-phobic song by Lou Reed.
Lou Reed! Trans-phobic!
I would guess 99% of trans individuals know the song in question, and almost none find the song offensive.Johnnie wrote:I wonder how many trans individuals even know the song in question. And from them how many are offended by it. And from them realize the year it was made and thus the intent behind it.
Since we know the trans community is already a small percentage I wonder exactly how many people from said community are truly offended.
Because otherwise this is the part of political correctness known as Revisionist History Through White Guilt. And a small factor in why Trump won the election.
Which should be an indicator to 100% of SJWs to STFU.The Sybian wrote:I would guess 99% of trans individuals know the song in question, and almost none find the song offensive.Johnnie wrote:I wonder how many trans individuals even know the song in question. And from them how many are offended by it. And from them realize the year it was made and thus the intent behind it.
Since we know the trans community is already a small percentage I wonder exactly how many people from said community are truly offended.
Because otherwise this is the part of political correctness known as Revisionist History Through White Guilt. And a small factor in why Trump won the election.
It should, yes.Johnnie wrote:Which should be an indicator to 100% of SJWs to STFU.The Sybian wrote:I would guess 99% of trans individuals know the song in question, and almost none find the song offensive.Johnnie wrote:I wonder how many trans individuals even know the song in question. And from them how many are offended by it. And from them realize the year it was made and thus the intent behind it.
Since we know the trans community is already a small percentage I wonder exactly how many people from said community are truly offended.
Because otherwise this is the part of political correctness known as Revisionist History Through White Guilt. And a small factor in why Trump won the election.
Kindred spirits it would seem.Giff wrote:Agreed. As I was reading the post, I thought it was going to be because some right-wing christians complained.
I'd still rather deal with that than people in Walmart wearing Pepe T-shirts and MAGA hats.P.D.X. wrote:Well, Canada.
Yeah...P.D.X. wrote:Well, Canada.
Not to mention the satellites: Harry, Mark and John...Jerloma wrote:Not to mention, Holly is a real person and a friend of his from New York.
Yeah, I was wondering about that because I thought we were already friends on FB.Jerloma wrote:SC, I got a friend request from you which probably means you've been hacked. Well, not hacked but someone probably duplicated your profile.
And might get to have lunch with a Swamper next month.sancarlos wrote:Sorry guys. Hacked. Please disregard any new friend requests.
It's frustrating, but I did get texts from a lot of old friends I haven't been in recent contact with.
Hi all, I'm a British documentary filmmaker living in Canada seeking collaboration with a Director or Producer of color to create a unique documentary project about shadeism. The doc follows a black Canadian choreographer as she tries to bring the topic of shadeism into the mainstream through her style of Afrofusion dance followed by a live debate with a multi-racial audience. I directed this short for CBCArts profiling the choreographer and am now working with a team who have backgrounds and perspectives from Jamaica, Egypt and Canada to develop this piece into a longer documentary. We're looking for a talented Canadian filmmaker from a community of color who would be interested in co-directing or co-producing this film to ensure the story can be told through a broad and inter-racial lens. We have shot a teaser and are at the pitching stage of development. To find out more check out the CBCArts piece below and the doc's website. If you'd like to chat more about getting involved please get in touch at
An "Afrofusion" cookout would certainly have better music.Johnnie wrote:Shadeism? Afrofusion?
I'm an atheist, but I suddenly feel like joining this religion. Especially if it dabbles in Twerkology. I'll pray to that all day long. And I look forward to the cookouts and complicated handshakes. I want to make a difference.
IN CASE YOU DON'T REALIZE IT, IT'S NOT NATIONAL BARBEQUE DAY, MR. MILITARY NON SUPPORTER GUY.bfj wrote:I just wish someone on FB would condescendingly explain what Memorial Day was all about. They should also tell me what it ISN'T about.
Is it about days off and picnics?Johnnie wrote:IN CASE YOU DON'T REALIZE IT, IT'S NOT NATIONAL BARBEQUE DAY, MR. MILITARY NON SUPPORTER GUY.bfj wrote:I just wish someone on FB would condescendingly explain what Memorial Day was all about. They should also tell me what it ISN'T about.
All kidding aside, it is for me. Never gave a thought about the troops even after becoming one initially. Then after a couple years the day meant more once people actively serving started dying in stupid fucking wars.bfj wrote:Is it about days off and picnics?