The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Okay . . . let's try this again.

Moderators: Shirley, Sabo, brian, rass, DaveInSeattle

Post Reply
User avatar
mister d
The Dude
Posts: 29229
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 8:15 am

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by mister d »

So here you're basically me in the soccer threads. #kickkickkick
Johnnie wrote: Sat Sep 10, 2022 8:13 pmOh shit, you just reminded me about toilet paper.
User avatar
sancarlos
The Dude
Posts: 18234
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:46 pm
Location: NorCal via Colorado

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by sancarlos »

Now for some hard-hitting journalism.

If you watched the Blues-Sharks game on Sunday, no doubt you noticed the large-breasted woman sitting directly behind Sharks' coach Peter DeBoer. (The tv cameraman sure noticed her.)

Here's her story.

"What a bunch of pedantic pricks." - sybian
User avatar
degenerasian
The Dude
Posts: 12343
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:22 pm

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by degenerasian »

And its always De Boer. Its like the worlds weirdest superpower
Kung Fu movies are like porn. There's 1 on 1, then 2 on 1, then a group scene..
User avatar
sancarlos
The Dude
Posts: 18234
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:46 pm
Location: NorCal via Colorado

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by sancarlos »

Hagelin impresses me. Amazing that two different playoff teams dumped him in the past year.
"What a bunch of pedantic pricks." - sybian
User avatar
mister d
The Dude
Posts: 29229
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 8:15 am

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by mister d »

S
H
U
T

U
P
!
Johnnie wrote: Sat Sep 10, 2022 8:13 pmOh shit, you just reminded me about toilet paper.
User avatar
rass
The Dude
Posts: 20327
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 9:41 am
Location: N effin' J

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by rass »

sancarlos wrote:Hagelin impresses me. Amazing that two different playoff teams dumped him in the past year.
I know, right?
I felt aswirl with warm secretions.
User avatar
rass
The Dude
Posts: 20327
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 9:41 am
Location: N effin' J

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by rass »

Vaselwhatev88 has been fucking great. He fucking stoned them in the second, but that goal at the 10 second mark was a killer.
I felt aswirl with warm secretions.
User avatar
rass
The Dude
Posts: 20327
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 9:41 am
Location: N effin' J

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by rass »

Dammit Pierre, leave Phil alone.
I felt aswirl with warm secretions.
User avatar
Jerloma
The Dude
Posts: 7124
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 2:10 pm

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by Jerloma »

rass wrote:Vaselwhatev88 has been fucking great. He fucking stoned them in the second, but that goal at the 10 second mark was a killer.
Yeah, that was one of those games where it just looked the dominant team was going to lose on something fluky. The 10 second goal changed that. Pittsburgh out-skated the piss out of them and their fore-checking was god damn brilliant. The between the legs pass from behind the net with a guy on his back in the first period by Sid was practically supernatural.
And the unicorns shall come down with them, and the bullocks with the bulls; and their land shall be soaked with blood, and their dust made fat with fatness. - God
User avatar
mister d
The Dude
Posts: 29229
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 8:15 am

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by mister d »

Circling back here, NYR definitely didn't "dump" Hagelin, we were just stuck with our stupid backs up against a salary cap wall because Sather fucked and refucked then fucked us some more with bridge deals and overpriced veterans. Someone that mattered had to go and Hagelin was cost-uncertain at the time of the trade (RFA) so he was the guy. Bad decisions led to a bad trade, but it was known bad at the time, not a retrospective fuckup.
Johnnie wrote: Sat Sep 10, 2022 8:13 pmOh shit, you just reminded me about toilet paper.
User avatar
sancarlos
The Dude
Posts: 18234
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:46 pm
Location: NorCal via Colorado

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by sancarlos »

mister d wrote:Circling back here, NYR definitely didn't "dump" Hagelin, we were just stuck with our stupid backs up against a salary cap wall because Sather fucked and refucked then fucked us some more with bridge deals and overpriced veterans. Someone that mattered had to go and Hagelin was cost-uncertain at the time of the trade (RFA) so he was the guy. Bad decisions led to a bad trade, but it was known bad at the time, not a retrospective fuckup.
I specifically used the term "dump" to have a bit of fun and get your goat. And, I looked up to see how the second round pick you got for him was doing and it looks like Gropp had a great year in juniors. So, there's that.
"What a bunch of pedantic pricks." - sybian
User avatar
govmentchedda
The Dude
Posts: 12750
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 4:36 pm

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by govmentchedda »

Had to sell my tickets to last night's "game" because I had a trial all day today. Wish I hadn't even watched it on TV. Bringing the wife for game 4, if we lose again, I may just leave her bad luck ass at the rink.
Until everything is less insane, I'm mixing weed with wine.
User avatar
brian
The Dude
Posts: 27862
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 10:52 am
Location: Downtown Las Vegas

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by brian »

WANT

Bandwagon fan of the 2023 STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS!
User avatar
rass
The Dude
Posts: 20327
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 9:41 am
Location: N effin' J

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by rass »

Dammit Andrew Stockey, you blew it.
I felt aswirl with warm secretions.
User avatar
rass
The Dude
Posts: 20327
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 9:41 am
Location: N effin' J

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by rass »

I wonder how close they've come to tying to open a place in Vegas? I know they just opened one in Indiana somewhere, and there are a couple in FL I think.
I felt aswirl with warm secretions.
User avatar
Sabo
The Dude
Posts: 5474
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:33 am
Location: On the trail

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by Sabo »

This might be an unpopular opinion, but I'm going to make it anyway:

Primanti Brothers' sandwiches are awful. Putting french fries in a sandwich is a crime against humanity.
THERE’S NOTHING WRONG WITH GALA LUNCHEONS, LAD!
User avatar
rass
The Dude
Posts: 20327
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 9:41 am
Location: N effin' J

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by rass »

I never really understood the anti-fry-on-sandwich position, especially when stated so forcefully. Unless you don't like fries at all, you would eat them with the sandwich, right?
I felt aswirl with warm secretions.
User avatar
govmentchedda
The Dude
Posts: 12750
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 4:36 pm

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by govmentchedda »

I like the combination of things on a Primanti bros sandwich, but the one I had at Primantis was horrible. Revolting.
Until everything is less insane, I'm mixing weed with wine.
User avatar
Sabo
The Dude
Posts: 5474
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:33 am
Location: On the trail

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by Sabo »

rass wrote:I never really understood the anti-fry-on-sandwich position, especially when stated so forcefully. Unless you don't like fries at all, you would eat them with the sandwich, right?
Maybe I've been unlucky with the few times I've had fries on a sandwich. In each instance, the fries were cold and greasy, which is never a winning combination for a fry. This isn't just a Primanti's thing ... there's a chain here in Cleveland called Panini's and they do the same thing. And again, the fries were cold and greasy. It just didn't add anything positive to the dining experience.

(I'm also a little fired up today because of shit that's going on at work, so I'm probably being more argumentative than normal.)
THERE’S NOTHING WRONG WITH GALA LUNCHEONS, LAD!
User avatar
duff
Donny
Posts: 2757
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 3:36 pm

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by duff »

Sabo wrote:
rass wrote:I never really understood the anti-fry-on-sandwich position, especially when stated so forcefully. Unless you don't like fries at all, you would eat them with the sandwich, right?
Maybe I've been unlucky with the few times I've had fries on a sandwich. In each instance, the fries were cold and greasy, which is never a winning combination for a fry. This isn't just a Primanti's thing ... there's a chain here in Cleveland called Panini's and they do the same thing. And again, the fries were cold and greasy. It just didn't add anything positive to the dining experience.

(I'm also a little fired up today because of shit that's going on at work, so I'm probably being more argumentative than normal.)
You are just pissed your dandelions caused your neighbor to call the medics.
To quote both Bruce Prichard and Tony Schiavone, "Fuck Duff Meltzer."
User avatar
Sabo
The Dude
Posts: 5474
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:33 am
Location: On the trail

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by Sabo »

Guilty!
THERE’S NOTHING WRONG WITH GALA LUNCHEONS, LAD!
User avatar
govmentchedda
The Dude
Posts: 12750
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 4:36 pm

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by govmentchedda »

Panini's was the name of the place here too. It closed years ago. Was in Ybor, and it was a fantastic 3 a.m. sandwich.
Until everything is less insane, I'm mixing weed with wine.
User avatar
mister d
The Dude
Posts: 29229
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 8:15 am

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by mister d »

sancarlos wrote:I specifically used the term "dump" to have a bit of fun and get your goat.
Well that obviously didn't work and it didn't bother me at all as you can see.
sancarlos wrote:And, I looked up to see how the second round pick you got for him was doing and it looks like Gropp had a great year in juniors. So, there's that.
I like Gropp a lot, great profile ... but we didn't get a 2nd rounder. We flipped 2nd rounders and moved up.
Johnnie wrote: Sat Sep 10, 2022 8:13 pmOh shit, you just reminded me about toilet paper.
User avatar
mister d
The Dude
Posts: 29229
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 8:15 am

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by mister d »

Fries on a sandwich is dumb as fuck and a textural nightmare.
Johnnie wrote: Sat Sep 10, 2022 8:13 pmOh shit, you just reminded me about toilet paper.
User avatar
rass
The Dude
Posts: 20327
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 9:41 am
Location: N effin' J

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by rass »

mister d wrote:Fries on a sandwich is...a textural nightmare.
See that would have been an opinion and I couldn't have argued with it. Perfectly reasonable take.


I however love their sandwiches, and cobbled together a homemade one for this past Monday's TBL/PIT game.
I felt aswirl with warm secretions.
User avatar
govmentchedda
The Dude
Posts: 12750
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 4:36 pm

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by govmentchedda »

rass wrote:
mister d wrote:Fries on a sandwich is...a textural nightmare.
See that would have been an opinion and I couldn't have argued with it. Perfectly reasonable take.


I however love their sandwiches, and cobbled together a homemade one for this past Monday's TBL/PIT game.
How about you don't do that tonight, OK?
Until everything is less insane, I'm mixing weed with wine.
User avatar
rass
The Dude
Posts: 20327
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 9:41 am
Location: N effin' J

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by rass »

govmentchedda wrote:
rass wrote:
mister d wrote:Fries on a sandwich is...a textural nightmare.
See that would have been an opinion and I couldn't have argued with it. Perfectly reasonable take.


I however love their sandwiches, and cobbled together a homemade one for this past Monday's TBL/PIT game.
How about you don't do that tonight, OK?
For an away game? Never!
I felt aswirl with warm secretions.
User avatar
degenerasian
The Dude
Posts: 12343
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:22 pm

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by degenerasian »

we have a Lebanese food truck here that puts fries inside a beef or chicken pita. It's a little weird.
Kung Fu movies are like porn. There's 1 on 1, then 2 on 1, then a group scene..
User avatar
Sabo
The Dude
Posts: 5474
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:33 am
Location: On the trail

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by Sabo »

So ... how 'bout them Sharks?

Thornton's pass for Hertl's second goal was pretty outstanding.



THERE’S NOTHING WRONG WITH GALA LUNCHEONS, LAD!
User avatar
L-Jam3
The Dude
Posts: 6003
Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 8:43 am

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by L-Jam3 »

Is potato chips inside a cold hoagie like an Italian hoagie a thing outside Philly? It's not a very common thing here, but it's done. But when I did it in North Jersey in college and LS, people looked at me funny.
My avatar corresponds on my place in the Swamp posting list with the all-time Home Run list. Number 45 is Paul Konerko with 439.
User avatar
govmentchedda
The Dude
Posts: 12750
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 4:36 pm

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by govmentchedda »

We talked earlier about MAF and Murray and whether the opposing team cares who is in net. I have a hypothesis about the Bolts that says that Bishop plays the puck more out of the back end than Vasy does. I have no stats to back this up, but as you've seen Andrei is a fantastic shot stopper. I'm not sure he's the play starter that Bishop is.
Until everything is less insane, I'm mixing weed with wine.
User avatar
mister d
The Dude
Posts: 29229
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 8:15 am

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by mister d »

So he's Lundqvist? Enjoy having everyone in front of him go to shit and never winning a Cup.
Johnnie wrote: Sat Sep 10, 2022 8:13 pmOh shit, you just reminded me about toilet paper.
User avatar
rass
The Dude
Posts: 20327
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 9:41 am
Location: N effin' J

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by rass »

Too late to screencap that entire last post and make it mister d's new avatar?
I felt aswirl with warm secretions.
User avatar
rass
The Dude
Posts: 20327
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 9:41 am
Location: N effin' J

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by rass »

Ouch. And ouch.



I felt aswirl with warm secretions.
User avatar
sancarlos
The Dude
Posts: 18234
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:46 pm
Location: NorCal via Colorado

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by sancarlos »

Sabo wrote:So ... how 'bout them Sharks?

Thornton's pass for Hertl's second goal was pretty outstanding.
Yeah! I am kind of shocked at how good the Sharks have been looking. Especially defensively. They've played better in the playoffs than the more-ballyhooed teams of the past ten years ever did. St. Louis had more shots, but they were mostly long slap shots that weren't big trouble for the goalie. The Sharks had a number of good looks in close that were started by counter-punch rushes.

I'm a little concerned that that St. Louis might now try to goon it up with Reaves, or have Ott or Upshall do their nasty little stuff. They have to try something different.

Too bad you aren't traveling out here now Sabo - maybe we could get you to a playoff game.
"What a bunch of pedantic pricks." - sybian
User avatar
Sabo
The Dude
Posts: 5474
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:33 am
Location: On the trail

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by Sabo »

sancarlos wrote:
Sabo wrote:So ... how 'bout them Sharks?

Thornton's pass for Hertl's second goal was pretty outstanding.
Yeah! I am kind of shocked at how good the Sharks have been looking. Especially defensively. They've played better in the playoffs than the more-ballyhooed teams of the past ten years ever did. St. Louis had more shots, but they were mostly long slap shots that weren't big trouble for the goalie. The Sharks had a number of good looks in close that were started by counter-punch rushes.
Their defense in the last five minutes after Hitchcock pulled the goalie was tremendous. I think St. Louis had two shots on goal during that entire time. Rather impressive for a six-on-five situation.
sancarlos wrote:Too bad you aren't traveling out here now Sabo - maybe we could get you to a playoff game.
I'd enjoy that. I need to invest in some Sharks gear of some kind. Still kind of kicking myself for not getting a Ryane Clowe jersey when we went to the first game. Right now the only NHL team I have gear for is the Pens. If this ends up a Sharks-Pens series for the Cup, I'm not sure who I'll root for.
THERE’S NOTHING WRONG WITH GALA LUNCHEONS, LAD!
User avatar
Rush2112
The Dude
Posts: 7302
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 4:35 pm
Location: Cyrus X-1
Contact:

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by Rush2112 »

degenerasian wrote:we have a Lebanese food truck here that puts fries inside a beef or chicken pita. It's a little weird.
So what's the opinion on California style burritos? (If unaware they're burritos with fries added.)
Did you see that ludicrous display last night?
User avatar
degenerasian
The Dude
Posts: 12343
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:22 pm

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by degenerasian »

Rush2112 wrote:
degenerasian wrote:we have a Lebanese food truck here that puts fries inside a beef or chicken pita. It's a little weird.
So what's the opinion on California style burritos? (If unaware they're burritos with fries added.)
never tried, we have Burritos with sushi in them!
Kung Fu movies are like porn. There's 1 on 1, then 2 on 1, then a group scene..
howard
Karl Hungus
Posts: 9467
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 12:00 pm

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by howard »

Rush2112 wrote:So what's the opinion on California style burritos? (If unaware they're burritos with fries added.)
Don't lay that crap on Cali. I've never heard of such a thing (and I hate it with extreme prejudice.)
Who knows? Maybe, you were kidnapped, tied up, taken away and held for ransom.

Those days are gone forever
Over a long time ago
Oh yeah…
User avatar
sancarlos
The Dude
Posts: 18234
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:46 pm
Location: NorCal via Colorado

Re: The OFFICIAL 2016 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Post by sancarlos »

howard wrote:
Rush2112 wrote:So what's the opinion on California style burritos? (If unaware they're burritos with fries added.)
Don't lay that crap on Cali. I've never heard of such a thing (and I hate it with extreme prejudice.)
Howard Johnson Reynolds is right! Harrumph harrumph.
"What a bunch of pedantic pricks." - sybian
Post Reply