Re: Random Politics
Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2024 11:10 pm
Ah, so it was my second option.
It's the sixth version of The Swamp. What could possibly go wrong?
http://www.sportsfrog.net/phpbb/
Yes, for privately owned media.Steve of phpBB wrote: ↑Sun Mar 24, 2024 8:33 pm The fundamental problem is that for-profit corporations exist to make profits for their shareholders. Their managers have a fiduciary duty to do so.
Historically, hasn’t the (supposedly) ideologically neutral media been the exception rather than the rule?
Republican paranoia over migrants has reached a new level of absurdity, as a State Representative and the State GOP Chair launched a conspiracy that buses of migrants were invading Michigan. It turns out it was the Gonzaga basketball team arriving for the game in the NCAA tournament.
...
The hoax was started my Michigan State Rep. Matt Maddock, whose bio on twitter describes himself as, 'Trump-endorsed, Ranked Most Conservative State Rep, Freedom Caucus, Anti-Communist.' Maddock posted that three buses of "illegal invaders" just loaded up at the Detroit Metro Airport." He had no evidence or proof whatsoever that these were migrants, but Republican hysteria and conspiracies don't require proof.
In fairness, there were a bunch of really tall people of color.DaveInSeattle wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2024 11:07 am MI GOP Launches 'Migrant Invader Bus' Hoax on Gonzaga Hoops Team
Republican paranoia over migrants has reached a new level of absurdity, as a State Representative and the State GOP Chair launched a conspiracy that buses of migrants were invading Michigan. It turns out it was the Gonzaga basketball team arriving for the game in the NCAA tournament.
...
The hoax was started my Michigan State Rep. Matt Maddock, whose bio on twitter describes himself as, 'Trump-endorsed, Ranked Most Conservative State Rep, Freedom Caucus, Anti-Communist.' Maddock posted that three buses of "illegal invaders" just loaded up at the Detroit Metro Airport." He had no evidence or proof whatsoever that these were migrants, but Republican hysteria and conspiracies don't require proof.
Guatemalan refugees are well known for being tall.The Sybian wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2024 12:49 pmIn fairness, there were a bunch of really tall people of color.DaveInSeattle wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2024 11:07 am MI GOP Launches 'Migrant Invader Bus' Hoax on Gonzaga Hoops Team
Republican paranoia over migrants has reached a new level of absurdity, as a State Representative and the State GOP Chair launched a conspiracy that buses of migrants were invading Michigan. It turns out it was the Gonzaga basketball team arriving for the game in the NCAA tournament.
...
The hoax was started my Michigan State Rep. Matt Maddock, whose bio on twitter describes himself as, 'Trump-endorsed, Ranked Most Conservative State Rep, Freedom Caucus, Anti-Communist.' Maddock posted that three buses of "illegal invaders" just loaded up at the Detroit Metro Airport." He had no evidence or proof whatsoever that these were migrants, but Republican hysteria and conspiracies don't require proof.
Dude has learned the Trump lesson well...never back down...no matter how stupid you are...The Sybian wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2024 12:49 pmIn fairness, there were a bunch of really tall people of color.DaveInSeattle wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2024 11:07 am MI GOP Launches 'Migrant Invader Bus' Hoax on Gonzaga Hoops Team
Republican paranoia over migrants has reached a new level of absurdity, as a State Representative and the State GOP Chair launched a conspiracy that buses of migrants were invading Michigan. It turns out it was the Gonzaga basketball team arriving for the game in the NCAA tournament.
...
The hoax was started my Michigan State Rep. Matt Maddock, whose bio on twitter describes himself as, 'Trump-endorsed, Ranked Most Conservative State Rep, Freedom Caucus, Anti-Communist.' Maddock posted that three buses of "illegal invaders" just loaded up at the Detroit Metro Airport." He had no evidence or proof whatsoever that these were migrants, but Republican hysteria and conspiracies don't require proof.
None of these bitches knew each other before there was a huge opportunity to force multiply all their followers.
Trump is going to change his position on that about 5 times before the end of the week.
It’s already happened to Graham ten times, yet he keeps kissing ass and getting burned. Fun to see, but I wish he stood up to Trump after his initial harsh words. If he stood firm, others may have followed. Or his political career would have ended, both great results.DaveInSeattle wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2024 10:45 pmTrump is going to change his position on that about 5 times before the end of the week.
But it couldn't happen to a nicer guy than Graham.
In a twisted way, I kind of cheer for this, as it will lead to a backlash against the GOP at the polls. Many people were complacent in not believing the Court would overturn Roe v Wade, and it will take states passing horrendous law for people to realize the importance of voting for politicians who support legislating a national law creating a right to abortion, or at the minimum not elected politicians who will support bans. The overwhelming majority of voters, even in red states, support the right to an abortion with more reasonable limitations (like we had prior to Dobbs). I was worried that too much time had passed since Dobbs, but these rulings will keep the issue at the forefront.
Naw, Trump doesn't think about anything substantive. But I thought whoever crafted his message was on point, because that kept the base happy by allowing draconian bans and using the "States Rights" slogan, while not taking an anti-abortion stance and turning off the majority of the electorate. His stance sounds reasonable if you don't understand the radical shift the Right is taking on abortion, and in his speech, he framed it as the Radical Left supports killing already born babies (actually said this), and he supports a common sense approach of allowing states to decide.DaveInSeattle wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2024 2:21 pmAnd Trump thinks that "Leave it up to the States!" is going to defuse the Abortion issue.
I'm going to disagree where it comes to running a campaign. He was absolutely told to say this by someone who knows how to make it seem to Trump like it was his idea. He can rile people up, but I truly don't believe he can think that far ahead when it comes to voting issues. While this seems "proactive" I do not believe that to be the case at all.Nonlinear FC wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2024 2:32 pm
And I don't think Trump is quite as moronic as we all like to think.
It's not like he just threw a dart or flipped a coin or thought this up while taking a #2.
Which to me, is a dead giveaway that it wasn't his own idea. He's flip flopped 13 times on abortion in the past 25 years.Nonlinear FC wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2024 2:47 pm I'm certainly not in the business of going to bat for Trump. But the idea that he just wanders the halls blathering about is just.. I dunno, inaccurate.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... nt-states/
He's impulsive and likes to "trust his gut." But he spent a year hashing this out.
I think we see him rambling at his rallies and assume that's what he's like all the time. He's not.
How did he get like this?In some ways, Adams’s shtick is conventionally conservative: He’s Christian, he’s very concerned about there being only two genders, he rails against “woke.” In other ways, his version of MAGA manhood is so over-the-top, so uncanny that it almost seems like performance art. The parody theory seems especially strong when Adams’s posts on X veer into double-entendre territory — juicing engagement from snarky foes and howling fans with posts about his butcher (“I love watching Mario handle my meat”) or golf (“A foursome with the boys will be the most fun you will ever have in your entire life”).
He writes about how if your wife is “high-maintenance” then you’re a “loser” no matter how hot she is. And about his love of steak.
“Alpha males don’t care about time changes, we wake up at 4AM every single morning regardless of the circumstances,” he wrote on X last month, a few days after the clocks sprang forward for daylight saving time. “64oz tomahawk ribeyes aren’t going to eat themselves!”
So instead of going to therapy, he's embracing the Rush Limbaugh 2.0 model. And, of course...Adams says he never heard his dad say the words “I love you.” But he doesn’t hold this against the old man, who died in 2021. He calls him the ultimate “alpha” and a great father who pushed his son to achieve excellence.
In a Trumpified GOP, and a Trumpified Washington, the answer is yes. He is a presidential appointee to the board of Washington’s Woodrow Wilson Center, which, according to its website, “provides nonpartisan counsel and insights on global affairs to policymakers.” Donald Trump, who bestowed him with that honor during his last term, has recently made Adams an official campaign surrogate as the former president attempts to regain control of the White House.
I mean, sure. And I'm mad at you for making me type this, but... That's how a lot of politicians operate. The only politicians that don't lean extremely heavily on advisors and whatnot are at the local level.A_B wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2024 2:51 pmWhich to me, is a dead giveaway that it wasn't his own idea. He's flip flopped 13 times on abortion in the past 25 years.Nonlinear FC wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2024 2:47 pm I'm certainly not in the business of going to bat for Trump. But the idea that he just wanders the halls blathering about is just.. I dunno, inaccurate.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... nt-states/
He's impulsive and likes to "trust his gut." But he spent a year hashing this out.
I think we see him rambling at his rallies and assume that's what he's like all the time. He's not.
Yeah, it was well thought out, but not by Trump. Beyond whether or not he is moronic, he is completely uninterested in anything except for how it effects him personally. He doesn't give a fuck whether abortions are legal or not, because he knows he can pay someone to abort his mistresses if he knocks one up. He doesn't give a fuck about any policy, he'll say whatever his advisors tell him to say.A_B wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2024 2:40 pmI'm going to disagree where it comes to running a campaign. He was absolutely told to say this by someone who knows how to make it seem to Trump like it was his idea. He can rile people up, but I truly don't believe he can think that far ahead when it comes to voting issues. While this seems "proactive" I do not believe that to be the case at all.Nonlinear FC wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2024 2:32 pm
And I don't think Trump is quite as moronic as we all like to think.
It's not like he just threw a dart or flipped a coin or thought this up while taking a #2.
Fair.Nonlinear FC wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2024 3:03 pm
I think what you are pointing out is that he's, by far, the least principled president we've ever had. The only calculation he makes is how it helps his bottomline, and secondarily how a position helps his polling numbers.
In 2016, Ducey expanded the court from five to seven justices, despite objections from the court’s justices, media outlets and every Democratic legislator.
Ducey has now appointed five of the seven justices, which included several controversial picks, such as Clint Bolick, who spent nearly a decade as a litigator for the Goldwater Institute, a powerful special interest group with a long history of working to privatize public schools and one of the parties challenging Prop. 208.
Ducey also appointed former Maricopa County Attorney Bill Montgomery, a close ally of the disgraced former sheriff, Joe Arpaio, and someone many considered far too political for the court.
Montgomery was originally rejected by the judicial nominating committee, but that didn’t deter Ducey. He simply replaced the members who objected to Montgomery with ones favorable to him. And as a result, the court has lurched further to the right even as our population has grown more moderate.
While Jones lived in Arizona, he was elected to represent Tucson in the 1st Arizona Territorial Legislative Assembly. And then, when that legislature convened in 1864, he was elected speaker of the House.
And it was that legislature — the one Jones presided over in 1864, after he had already abandoned his first wife, and married a 12-year-old and was just weeks away from marrying a 15-year-old, though still a few years away from marrying a 14-year-old — it was that legislature that passed a law reading, “Every person who shall administer or cause to be administered or taken, any medicinal substances, or shall use or cause to be used any instruments whatever, with the intention to procure the miscarriage of any woman then being with child, and shall be thereof duly convicted, shall be punished by imprisonment in the Territorial prison for a term not less than two years nor more than five years.”
And it was that piece of legislation that, earlier this week, was reinstated as law of the land in Arizona.