Student says teacher harassed him for wearing Broncos Jersey

Welcome to the Swamp, our famous conversation board. We talk primarily about sports but you can have your say about just about anything. Please register yourself and say hello.
User avatar
hdo45331
Monk
Posts: 2970
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 3:34 pm
Location: Looking for the Bengal's bandwagon

Post by hdo45331 »

Brainbo wrote:For the record, I don't have a dick. Enjoy it greatly under appropriate circumstances, but don't have one of my own. You understand that, don't you brooshkin?


Seriously -- cut the fucking personal attacks.

Edited after some time to stop being annoyed: On further review, screw it. Keep them coming. People here have much worse said about them. I have a dick? Perfect. I'm officially a self-sustaining woman.


Great. Just what alot of men wanted to hear. Thanks alot.
"Oh, Alex."

Ryan Friedman, AKA Turd Furgeson
User avatar
brooshkin
Tenspeed and Brown Shoe
Posts: 846
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 3:16 pm

Post by brooshkin »

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/stor ... LHeadlines

BEAVER FALLS, Pa. -- A Pennsylvania student who complained that a teacher forced him to sit on the floor during a midterm exam for wearing a Denver Broncos John Elway jersey has left the school district.

Brian Vannoy said his son, Joshua, faced continued harassment and silence from students at Beaver Falls High School.

"He doesn't feel wanted," Brian Vannoy told the Beaver County Times. "I just want him to be happy in school."

The 17-year-old junior enrolled at a new school Friday, but his father would not identify the school. Vannoy returned to school on Jan. 30 with an escort.

Vannoy wore the jersey of retired Denver quarterback to class Jan. 20, two days before the Steelers beat the Broncos in the AFC championship game. Teacher John Kelly, a Pittsburgh Steelers fan, forced him to take the midterm sitting on the floor and encouraged other students to pelt him with wads of paper.

Big Beaver Falls Area School District officials could not be reached for comment Sunday.

Just caught this on PTI. I agree with Wilbon.
User avatar
Jerloma
Rabbi David Small
Posts: 7055
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 10:42 am

Post by Jerloma »

brooshkin wrote:Just caught this on PTI. I agree with Wilbon.
That's always dangerous. What's Wilbon's take?
User avatar
brooshkin
Tenspeed and Brown Shoe
Posts: 846
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 3:16 pm

Post by brooshkin »

He was incredulous that the teacher still had a job ... no disciplinary action whatsoever? Something like that. He also stated again that "if I was the Dad I'd put my foot in his ass".

Just kidding. Can't remember his exact words but it was something along this line.

They showed the kid again. I mean ... damn what an easy target. He sure doesn't look like someone who would take a hazing incident in stride. Must have felt like shooting fish in a barrel for that teacher.
User avatar
PresidentCerrano
Sherlock Holmes
Posts: 1057
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:57 pm
Location: :noitacoL

Post by PresidentCerrano »

Jerloma wrote:
brooshkin wrote:Just caught this on PTI. I agree with Wilbon.
That's always dangerous. What's Wilbon's take?
and wilbon doesn't know what he's talking about. when it comes to a situation concerning a complaint made against a teacher, many school districts suspend that teacher right away, just to cover their ass. this school district conducted an investigation and found that this situation was blown way out of proportion. can't find the link, but, no other students have come out and coroborated the story of this student. and students will tell the truth.

while the following is speculation, is it logical to assume that this teacher has made absolutely no enemies among the student body and that this is the first time this kind of incident occurred with this teacher? as a veteran teacher, a pattern would have been established and other students, alumni and current, would have come forward to say that this teacher has done this in the past.
User avatar
Jerloma
Rabbi David Small
Posts: 7055
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 10:42 am

Post by Jerloma »

PresidentCerrano wrote:
Jerloma wrote:
brooshkin wrote:Just caught this on PTI. I agree with Wilbon.
That's always dangerous. What's Wilbon's take?
and wilbon doesn't know what he's talking about. when it comes to a situation concerning a complaint made against a teacher, many school districts suspend that teacher right away, just to cover their ass. this school district conducted an investigation and found that this situation was blown way out of proportion. can't find the link, but, no other students have come out and coroborated the story of this student. and students will tell the truth.

while the following is speculation, is it logical to assume that this teacher has made absolutely no enemies among the student body and that this is the first time this kind of incident occurred with this teacher? as a veteran teacher, a pattern would have been established and other students, alumni and current, would have come forward to say that this teacher has done this in the past.
That's what I was thinking. He seems to disregard the fact that there was an investigation and the teacher was for all intenses purposes, absolved.
Brainbo wrote:Just thought I'd send a little update from the Steel City. As far as I can tell, Joshua wasn't, in fact, giving all of the pertinent details to the press. But, hey, he got a recliner signed by John Elway (you know, of the Elway line of recliners), so perhaps that makes him feel like it was worth it. Oh, and he gets the option to drop the class.
The Big Beaver Falls Area School District said it will not take any disciplinary action against a high school teacher accused of humiliating a student who wore a Denver Broncos jersey to his class.

John Kelly "has already been the brunt of adverse public opinion and the school district does not believe discipline is warranted or would serve any purpose," said a news release issued yesterday by the school district.

More than a week after Beaver Falls High School student Joshua Vannoy told newspapers from Pittsburgh to Denver that he was humiliated by Mr. Kelly for wearing a Broncos jersey to school two days before the Steelers won the AFC Championship game against the Broncos, Joshua has returned to school and school administrators have completed their investigation.

Joshua, 17, complained that Mr. Kelly, a hard core Steelers fan, didn't like his Broncos jersey and forced him to sit on the floor while taking his mid-term examination in the honors ethnic relations class. Mr. Kelly offered other students, who sat in a circle of desks around Joshua, extra points on their test for throwing wads of paper at him.

During the investigation, the administrators talked to the teacher, all witnesses and Joshua, who returned to school on Monday. Although the administrators found nothing false in Joshua's version of events, they explained in their news release that the ethnic relations course is a popular elective taken by honor students.

"As part of the course, students are often singled out to exemplify uncomfortable treatment and students who enroll in the course are aware of this fact," the statement said.

"Face to face discussions and interaction among students and with the instructor sitting in a circle is a normal classroom setting for this course."

The investigation found there was "no grabbing or name-calling. Although his instructor and other classmates tossed crumpled paper at the student, it did not occur during the actual exam."

Neither Joshua nor his attorney, Nicholas Frisk III, could be reached yesterday. School Superintendent Donna Nugent and Principal Thomas Karczewski also could not be reached.

In earlier interviews, Joshua and his attorney said Joshua had been receiving "nasty" messages from classmates who disapprove of him causing trouble for Mr. Kelly, a popular teacher. Mr. Frisk advised Joshua to stay home until the school could arrange for his safe return.

Mr. Kelly also played a role in that process.

"The teacher himself had previously addressed the student body requesting that they show respect for Josh and not allow this matter to be blown further out of proportion," according to the school district's statement. "The teacher personally apologized to the student, explaining that he had no intentions of upsetting the student and that it was meant as a joke."

Lee Price, whose law firm represents the Big Beaver Falls Area School District, said Joshua will have the option of dropping Mr. Kelly's class, but he did not know yesterday if that would happen.

"As far as the district is concerned, this is over and we believe this has put the matter behind everyone, particularly for Josh and the teacher," he said.
User avatar
brooshkin
Tenspeed and Brown Shoe
Posts: 846
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 3:16 pm

Post by brooshkin »

"As far as the district is concerned, this is over and we believe this has put the matter behind everyone, particularly for Josh and the teacher," he said.

It might be a stretch but I don't think the matter has been put behind for the kid. For the teacher maybe ...
User avatar
Jerloma
Rabbi David Small
Posts: 7055
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 10:42 am

Post by Jerloma »

Perhaps, but whose fault is that? The teachers or the kids for failing to understand the point of the excercise and instead choosing to make himself the victim?

I know your answer. We'll agree to disagree.
User avatar
sancarloskid
Monk
Posts: 2570
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 11:04 am
Location: NorCal (Colorado native, though)

Post by sancarloskid »

the administrators found nothing false in Joshua's version of events
Joshua had been receiving "nasty" messages from classmates who disapprove of him causing trouble for Mr. Kelly, a popular teacher. Mr. Frisk advised Joshua to stay home until the school could arrange for his safe return.
Although his instructor and other classmates tossed crumpled paper at the student, it did not occur during the actual exam."
Brooshkin wrote:"As far as the district is concerned, this is over and we believe this has put the matter behind everyone, particularly for Josh and the teacher," he said.

It might be a stretch but I don't think the matter has been put behind for the kid. For the teacher maybe ...
Word.

Some folks here have publicly said "the kid deserved it.", and now say the kid basically made something out of nothing. Others say it was a tempest in a teapot and we should move on - that darn Wilbon!

To that I must ask, if it is no big deal, then why is the kid feeling the need to transfer t a new school? Obviously, this has taken a mob mentality turn among the students and the kid has been harassed to the point he needs to transfer. Pretty damned poor judgement by the teacher, but the teacher has suffered enough and deserves no punishment. Bullshit.
"Eight hundred leaf-tables and no chairs? You can't sell leaf-tables and no chairs. With chairs, you got a dinette set. No chairs, you got dick!"
User avatar
Jerloma
Rabbi David Small
Posts: 7055
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 10:42 am

Post by Jerloma »

sancarloskid wrote:
the administrators found nothing false in Joshua's version of events
Joshua had been receiving "nasty" messages from classmates who disapprove of him causing trouble for Mr. Kelly, a popular teacher. Mr. Frisk advised Joshua to stay home until the school could arrange for his safe return.
Although his instructor and other classmates tossed crumpled paper at the student, it did not occur during the actual exam."
Brooshkin wrote:"As far as the district is concerned, this is over and we believe this has put the matter behind everyone, particularly for Josh and the teacher," he said.

It might be a stretch but I don't think the matter has been put behind for the kid. For the teacher maybe ...
Word.

Some folks here have publicly said "the kid deserved it.", and now say the kid basically made something out of nothing. Others say it was a tempest in a teapot and we should move on - that darn Wilbon!

To that I must ask, if it is no big deal, then why is the kid feeling the need to transfer t a new school? Obviously, this has taken a mob mentality turn among the students and the kid has been harassed to the point he needs to transfer. Pretty damned poor judgement by the teacher, but the teacher has suffered enough and deserves no punishment. Bullshit.
Nice cherry-picking with the quotes. How come you didn't choose this one?
"As part of the course, students are often singled out to exemplify uncomfortable treatment and students who enroll in the course are aware of this fact," the statement said.
On a totally different matter, I started a thread and basically compared John Elway to Terrell Owens. Nothing from you. I think you're going soft. :P
User avatar
Dave
John Shaft
Posts: 6975
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 3:54 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC
Contact:

Post by Dave »

I feel very little sympathy for that kid. The only sympathy I do feel is because he's a kid and maybe really didn't know what was going to happen. But the second this kid and his retarded parents started crying and claiming victim and going to the fucking media, they were screwed. I mean, come on. Why do we even know about this? Kids have worse things happen to them pretty much every single day in every high school in this country, but yet I know this story and what this kid looks like.

He made a conscious choice to go ahead and make a big deal out of it, basically demanding that everyone in the school (and hell, a ton of strangers on a message board) take a side on the issue. Well, if you're going to put folks in that position, you better be damn sure that they are going to take your side.

I mean, did anyone here really think it would end any other way? Even if they fired the teacher on the spot, would it have made one bit of difference? No, it probably would have been worse, because the teacher not only sounds like he was popular, but he tried to limit the damage to this kid. Unfortunately, there's no way to tell teenagers not to be brutal to kids who are asking for it.

I feel bad for the kid. I do. It's a tough lesson, but it's one that he shouldn't have needed to learn this way.
User avatar
sancarloskid
Monk
Posts: 2570
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 11:04 am
Location: NorCal (Colorado native, though)

Post by sancarloskid »

Speaking of cherry picking, I like how the administrator points to the course format (as you noted) as if that was the basis for the tough ride the kid got.

But, the teacher didn't point to that as the basis. He said that it was just all a big joke.

Those guys ought to get their stories straight.

PS: I do have enough respect for your knowledge to let the Elway/Owens thing slide, because I know you know better. :P
"Eight hundred leaf-tables and no chairs? You can't sell leaf-tables and no chairs. With chairs, you got a dinette set. No chairs, you got dick!"
User avatar
sancarloskid
Monk
Posts: 2570
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 11:04 am
Location: NorCal (Colorado native, though)

Post by sancarloskid »

Dave wrote: I mean, did anyone here really think it would end any other way? Even if they fired the teacher on the spot, would it have made one bit of difference? No, it probably would have been worse, because the teacher not only sounds like he was popular, but he tried to limit the damage to this kid. Unfortunately, there's no way to tell teenagers not to be brutal to kids who are asking for it.

I feel bad for the kid. I do. It's a tough lesson, but it's one that he shouldn't have needed to learn this way.
Dave, my beef is that the half-assed excuse the school put forth for not punishing the teacher is bullshit. I just don't see at all how folks hereabouts are reading it and then saying, "Ohhh, the teacher was not acting incorrectly - he was wronged here." The kid may not be 100% pure, but the teacher is much less so, and he just got a free pass for his bullshit act. Nice example for the students.

Would have been different if he wasn't doing it in the name of the popular home team, methinks.
"Eight hundred leaf-tables and no chairs? You can't sell leaf-tables and no chairs. With chairs, you got a dinette set. No chairs, you got dick!"
User avatar
Dave
John Shaft
Posts: 6975
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 3:54 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC
Contact:

Post by Dave »

sancarloskid wrote:
Dave wrote: I mean, did anyone here really think it would end any other way? Even if they fired the teacher on the spot, would it have made one bit of difference? No, it probably would have been worse, because the teacher not only sounds like he was popular, but he tried to limit the damage to this kid. Unfortunately, there's no way to tell teenagers not to be brutal to kids who are asking for it.

I feel bad for the kid. I do. It's a tough lesson, but it's one that he shouldn't have needed to learn this way.
Dave, my beef is that the half-assed excuse the school put forth for not punishing the teacher is bullshit. I just don't see at all how folks hereabouts are reading it and then saying, "Ohhh, the teacher was not acting incorrectly - he was wronged here." The kid may not be 100% pure, but the teacher is much less so, and he just got a free pass for his bullshit act. Nice example for the students.

Would have been different if he wasn't doing it in the name of the popular home team, methinks.
Well, it may well be that the school (and school board) was mighty pissed at the kid for going to the press with his story so that they had to deal with a flood of media requests. And it is also quite likely that the teacher's version of how it really went down was corroborated by several other students.

From what I know about how schools deal with this sort of thing (and it's my wife's job, so I do know a thing or two), I'm sure they took it very seriously. Whenever any asshole family does something like this, it's a sure sign that they are planning a lawsuit, so I'm sure the school did their due diligence.

Given the craziness of the kid's version of the story, the way he pimped himself out to the media (putting the jersey back on and looking sad for the cameras), the story that later came out about what "really" happened, the quotes from other kids about the teacher and finally that the school didn't really punish the teacher - it all adds up to my believing the teacher and not the kid.
User avatar
brooshkin
Tenspeed and Brown Shoe
Posts: 846
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 3:16 pm

Post by brooshkin »

"The teacher himself had previously addressed the student body requesting that they show respect for Josh and not allow this matter to be blown further out of proportion," according to the school district's statement. "The teacher personally apologized to the student, explaining that he had no intentions of upsetting the student and that it was meant as a joke."

Why when I ponder this statement do I get a mental picture of Col Nathan R. Jessup ordering his men to not give Private Santiago any shit.
Post Reply