The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
Moderators: Shirley, Sabo, brian, rass, DaveInSeattle
The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
Let's start with some good news.
Fox has announced this will be Tim McCarver's last season calling MLB games.
Fox has announced this will be Tim McCarver's last season calling MLB games.
THERE’S NOWT WRONG WITH GALA LUNCHEONS, LAD!
- degenerasian
- The Dude
- Posts: 12377
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:22 pm
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
Ricky Romero sent down to Single-A! Dunedin.
Absolutely fallen off the map. Has there ever been an opening day pitcher optioned to Single-A the following year?
Absolutely fallen off the map. Has there ever been an opening day pitcher optioned to Single-A the following year?
Kung Fu movies are like porn. There's 1 on 1, then 2 on 1, then a group scene..
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
I'm still shaking my head over all of the hand-wringing about the Tigers closer situation. Latest reports are that the Tigers offered Rick Porcello to the Padres for Huston Street, who if the reports are believed turned them down.
I'm not sure what's crazier -- the Tigers offering that deal or the Padres turning it down.
I know it'll never happen, but if and when Rondon shows he can't handle the job (and he's been a lot better in the last two weeks of spring training), I'd rather the Tigers just went to closer by committee. On a given day, I'd feel comfortable with Benoit, Albuquerque, Dotel or Coke* doing the job.
* - assuming that the Tigers will be facing a slate of lefties in the 9th. If Coke pitches to more than a handful of right-handed hitters this year, Leyland is going to give me a stroke.
I'm not sure what's crazier -- the Tigers offering that deal or the Padres turning it down.
I know it'll never happen, but if and when Rondon shows he can't handle the job (and he's been a lot better in the last two weeks of spring training), I'd rather the Tigers just went to closer by committee. On a given day, I'd feel comfortable with Benoit, Albuquerque, Dotel or Coke* doing the job.
* - assuming that the Tigers will be facing a slate of lefties in the 9th. If Coke pitches to more than a handful of right-handed hitters this year, Leyland is going to give me a stroke.
Bandwagon fan of the 2023 STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS!
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
I just read on Twitter that Rondon has been optioned to the minors.
THERE’S NOWT WRONG WITH GALA LUNCHEONS, LAD!
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
Well, there you go. Maybe the Tigers traded Porcello for the some other third-tier closer.Sabo wrote:I just read on Twitter that Rondon has been optioned to the minors.
Bandwagon fan of the 2023 STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS!
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
I'm sure I'm being Mr. Obvious here, but just make Porcello the closer. His stuff would play up something crazy in the pen.
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
Yeah, that was discussed during spring training and the fact that Porcello pitched pretty well out of the pen in the playoffs probably added to it. It's a great idea in theory, but I suspect Porcello would rather start (understandable) and it could arguably depress his trade value since they seem hell-bent on dealing him.mister d wrote:I'm sure I'm being Mr. Obvious here, but just make Porcello the closer. His stuff would play up something crazy in the pen.
Bandwagon fan of the 2023 STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS!
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
I like what the Tigers are doing. Keeping six quality starting pitchers is smart, given that they have absolutely nothing but hopes and prayers in the minors. They've got good relief pitchers. If no closer emerges, they can deal for another arm in July. Too, the rotation may be so strong that the need for a closer is less than usual.
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
I totally agree. I'm fine with closer by committee. I'd rather see them using the right pitcher in the right situation (Coke against lefties, Al-Al when needing a strikeout/groundout), but it's Leyland that can't deal with it and unfortunately he's still the manager.DC47 wrote:I like what the Tigers are doing. Keeping six quality starting pitchers is smart, given that they have absolutely nothing but hopes and prayers in the minors. They've got good relief pitchers. If no closer emerges, they can deal for another arm in July. Too, the rotation may be so strong that the need for a closer is less than usual.
But knowing the Tigers I know exactly how this script is going to go. They'll lose a small handful of games they "shouldn't have" because of issues with pitching in the ninth, Dombrowski will panic and deal Porcello or Smyly or god forbid Castellanos for pennies on the dollar. I hope I'm wrong.
Bandwagon fan of the 2023 STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS!
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
The Red Sox have plenty of 2nd, 3rd, and 4th rate closers if the Tigers want to give them Porcello. Why would the Tigers want to give him up without getting a lot in return?
As for the Red Sox, I guess it's good that there are a lot of prospects people are excited about (Bradley Jr, Owens, the pitchers from the Dodgers trade). But it's not good that fans get to watch Victorino and Lackey keeping the seats warm until those prospects are ready.
As for the Red Sox, I guess it's good that there are a lot of prospects people are excited about (Bradley Jr, Owens, the pitchers from the Dodgers trade). But it's not good that fans get to watch Victorino and Lackey keeping the seats warm until those prospects are ready.
- DSafetyGuy
- The Dude
- Posts: 8839
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 12:29 pm
- Location: Behind the high school
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
Keeping Smyly around in the pen will be good for the days when Scherzer and Porcello start. Since Scherzer has high pitch counts in relatively shorter outings (5-6), it would be good to have Smyly be available to throw 2-3 innings and keep Leyland from blowing through four or five relievers in the same game. Porcello is the same for when he gets knocked around occasionally. Hopefully, they just keep the two split apart in the rotation. This deployment would also keep Smyly reasonably stretched out in case one of the starters goes down with an injury.brian wrote:I totally agree. I'm fine with closer by committee. I'd rather see them using the right pitcher in the right situation (Coke against lefties, Al-Al when needing a strikeout/groundout), but it's Leyland that can't deal with it and unfortunately he's still the manager.DC47 wrote:I like what the Tigers are doing. Keeping six quality starting pitchers is smart, given that they have absolutely nothing but hopes and prayers in the minors. They've got good relief pitchers. If no closer emerges, they can deal for another arm in July. Too, the rotation may be so strong that the need for a closer is less than usual.
But knowing the Tigers I know exactly how this script is going to go. They'll lose a small handful of games they "shouldn't have" because of issues with pitching in the ninth, Dombrowski will panic and deal Porcello or Smyly or god forbid Castellanos for pennies on the dollar. I hope I'm wrong.
Your point on Leyland having the issue with wanting set roles for his pen (going back to the paint-by-numbers bullpen management style of Zumaya-Rodney-Jones in 2006) is completely true. Just open another pack and duck down the runway, Jimmy. Dotel has closed. Benoit has closed. Coke has closed. Suck it up and use them wisely.
“The running, the jumping... a celebration of life.”
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
Which of their previous deals do you think are in this category?brian wrote:I totally agree. I'm fine with closer by committee. I'd rather see them using the right pitcher in the right situation (Coke against lefties, Al-Al when needing a strikeout/groundout), but it's Leyland that can't deal with it and unfortunately he's still the manager.
But knowing the Tigers I know exactly how this script is going to go. They'll lose a small handful of games they "shouldn't have" because of issues with pitching in the ninth, Dombrowski will panic and deal Porcello or Smyly or god forbid Castellanos for pennies on the dollar. I hope I'm wrong.
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
Last year's Sanchez/Infante deal most notably. I'll grant that Dombrowski has generally gotten good return when dealing prospects, with the exception of the Jair Jurrjens deal (though that was offseason), but it's frustrating to continually see the long-term mortgaged for the short term when the Tigers are -- short of a catastrophic run of injuries or legendarily bad luck -- a dead nuts lock to make the postseason anyway.
So if the pen blows, say, five saves before the All-Star Break, maybe they win the Central by 7 games instead of 12. All that matters is making the postseason and being healthy in the postseason since it such a crapshoot.
So if the pen blows, say, five saves before the All-Star Break, maybe they win the Central by 7 games instead of 12. All that matters is making the postseason and being healthy in the postseason since it such a crapshoot.
Bandwagon fan of the 2023 STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS!
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
I was just going to ask he exact same thing. Really just assumed at first that the Jays sent Romero to Triple-A Buffalo of the International League. But Dunedin? Single-A? The Florida State League? Wow. That's a serious demotion. Alex Anthropododopopolous said it was because of the climate; Dunedin being warmer, Romero won't miss any starts. Sure. Maybe Alex got tired of Rickey wearing his hat sideways.degenerasian wrote:Ricky Romero sent down to Single-A! Dunedin.
Absolutely fallen off the map. Has there ever been an opening day pitcher optioned to Single-A the following year?
He'll be the richest guy in A-Ball, probably.
Your own personal AR-15 wielding Jesus
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
I could be wrong about this, but there's usually what's called "extended spring training" where a lot of prospects end up in April because a lot of the organization's best coaches stay down in Florida (or Arizona as the case may be) so maybe the idea is to have him benefit from that and then bring him up to AAA in May-ish.Scottie wrote:I was just going to ask he exact same thing. Really just assumed at first that the Jays sent Romero to Triple-A Buffalo of the International League. But Dunedin? Single-A? The Florida State League? Wow. That's a serious demotion. Alex Anthropododopopolous said it was because of the climate; Dunedin being warmer, Romero won't miss any starts. Sure. Maybe Alex got tired of Rickey wearing his hat sideways.degenerasian wrote:Ricky Romero sent down to Single-A! Dunedin.
Absolutely fallen off the map. Has there ever been an opening day pitcher optioned to Single-A the following year?
He'll be the richest guy in A-Ball, probably.
Bandwagon fan of the 2023 STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS!
- Brontoburglar
- The Dude
- Posts: 5878
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:20 am
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
Halladay?degenerasian wrote:Ricky Romero sent down to Single-A! Dunedin.
Absolutely fallen off the map. Has there ever been an opening day pitcher optioned to Single-A the following year?
"We're not the smartest people in the world. We go down the straightaway and turn left. That's literally what we do." -- Clint Bowyer
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
Whoa.
Tigers extend Verlander for 7 years, $180M (with a vesting option for 8 years, $202M).
I did not see that coming. Verlander had been saying for quite some time he might look forward to being a free agent (not saying he necessarily wanted to leave Detroit, but that he might want to experience free agency at least once in his career). Guess getting the largest contract in history for a pitcher and locking up $24M a year through your age 37 season can change things.
ETA: OK, looks like it is actually a 5 year extension of his current deal which had 2 years, $40M left. So, it's an additional 5 years, $140M with the vesting option. Total AAV of $26M.
Tigers extend Verlander for 7 years, $180M (with a vesting option for 8 years, $202M).
I did not see that coming. Verlander had been saying for quite some time he might look forward to being a free agent (not saying he necessarily wanted to leave Detroit, but that he might want to experience free agency at least once in his career). Guess getting the largest contract in history for a pitcher and locking up $24M a year through your age 37 season can change things.
ETA: OK, looks like it is actually a 5 year extension of his current deal which had 2 years, $40M left. So, it's an additional 5 years, $140M with the vesting option. Total AAV of $26M.
Bandwagon fan of the 2023 STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS!
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
Holy Crap. He is good but I just don't understand these long term deals. Is it just a risk/reward thing?
Congrats on the sign Brian/Tigers fans. He is great. Hope that doesn't bite you in the ass.
Congrats on the sign Brian/Tigers fans. He is great. Hope that doesn't bite you in the ass.
Dances with Wolves (1) - BSF
"This place was rockin'," said BSF21.
"There is nothing ever uncommon about BSF21."
"This place was rockin'," said BSF21.
"There is nothing ever uncommon about BSF21."
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
He's been remarkably injury-free (which scares me in a way), but this deal doesn't worry me as much as the Fielder contract does/did. It takes him through age 37, which is kinda scary, but I think he has the brains and the stuff to adjust when age starts to inevitably take a bite out of his velocity. He gets a lot of attention for his heater, but it's not the reason he's successful. There's also a non-zero chance he ends up as a Nolan Ryan-like freak of nature.BSF21 wrote:Holy Crap. He is good but I just don't understand these long term deals. Is it just a risk/reward thing?
Congrats on the sign Brian/Tigers fans. He is great. Hope that doesn't bite you in the ass.
Bandwagon fan of the 2023 STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS!
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
Very true. Don't get me wrong, it is a hell of a sign. It is just the long term deal in general that scares me. It seems to have become a big-dick contest between both teams and players. Get your name on SC for a 30 second spot. Just seems to be bad business sense. There is no loyalty in professional athletics anyway I suppose. Doesn't work the same way our worlds do.brian wrote:He's been remarkably injury-free (which scares me in a way), but this deal doesn't worry me as much as the Fielder contract does/did. It takes him through age 37, which is kinda scary, but I think he has the brains and the stuff to adjust when age starts to inevitably take a bite out of his velocity. He gets a lot of attention for his heater, but it's not the reason he's successful. There's also a non-zero chance he ends up as a Nolan Ryan-like freak of nature.BSF21 wrote:Holy Crap. He is good but I just don't understand these long term deals. Is it just a risk/reward thing?
Congrats on the sign Brian/Tigers fans. He is great. Hope that doesn't bite you in the ass.
I hope he doesn't break down. He actively makes me watch baseball when he pitches. That is saying something about a guy when he can make me watch a team I have no rooting interest in because he is just that good.
Dances with Wolves (1) - BSF
"This place was rockin'," said BSF21.
"There is nothing ever uncommon about BSF21."
"This place was rockin'," said BSF21.
"There is nothing ever uncommon about BSF21."
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
Yeah, if you're the Tigers you're damned if you do and damned if you don't. If they waited until after this season or even after his walk year you might end up paying more to keep him. The Yankees, most notably, are going to have a lot of money to throw around after the 2014 season. Of course, you're absorbing a lot of risk as well, but I'd rather teams reward their own players with megadeals than throw money at free agents (like the Tigers did with Fielder*).BSF21 wrote:Very true. Don't get me wrong, it is a hell of a sign. It is just the long term deal in general that scares me. It seems to have become a big-dick contest between both teams and players. Get your name on SC for a 30 second spot. Just seems to be bad business sense. There is no loyalty in professional athletics anyway I suppose. Doesn't work the same way our worlds do.brian wrote:He's been remarkably injury-free (which scares me in a way), but this deal doesn't worry me as much as the Fielder contract does/did. It takes him through age 37, which is kinda scary, but I think he has the brains and the stuff to adjust when age starts to inevitably take a bite out of his velocity. He gets a lot of attention for his heater, but it's not the reason he's successful. There's also a non-zero chance he ends up as a Nolan Ryan-like freak of nature.BSF21 wrote:Holy Crap. He is good but I just don't understand these long term deals. Is it just a risk/reward thing?
Congrats on the sign Brian/Tigers fans. He is great. Hope that doesn't bite you in the ass.
I hope he doesn't break down. He actively makes me watch baseball when he pitches. That is saying something about a guy when he can make me watch a team I have no rooting interest in because he is just that good.
* - and that having been said, Fielder's durability is pretty impressive for a guy who is, well, not in great shape if we're being generous.
Bandwagon fan of the 2023 STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS!
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
That's probably exactly what's happening. And Alex A hinted just so. Mind you, he also described Romero has having "severe mechanical problems" and a complete lack of confidence.brian wrote:I could be wrong about this, but there's usually what's called "extended spring training" where a lot of prospects end up in April because a lot of the organization's best coaches stay down in Florida (or Arizona as the case may be) so maybe the idea is to have him benefit from that and then bring him up to AAA in May-ish.
Your own personal AR-15 wielding Jesus
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
Rather interesting that guys who look out of shape are incredibly durable (most notably, Fielder and C.C. Sabathia). I'd think there are other examples, but I can't think of any off the top of my head.brian wrote:Yeah, if you're the Tigers you're damned if you do and damned if you don't. If they waited until after this season or even after his walk year you might end up paying more to keep him. The Yankees, most notably, are going to have a lot of money to throw around after the 2014 season. Of course, you're absorbing a lot of risk as well, but I'd rather teams reward their own players with megadeals than throw money at free agents (like the Tigers did with Fielder*).
* - and that having been said, Fielder's durability is pretty impressive for a guy who is, well, not in great shape if we're being generous.
THERE’S NOWT WRONG WITH GALA LUNCHEONS, LAD!
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
I think these examples point to the vagueness of the concept of "being in shape." Fielder and Sabathia are undeniably fat. But they are not running marathons or playing midfield for Man U. I suspect that they have a high degree of leg and core strength. Their joints are probably pretty healthy. Given their athletic specialties, they may actually be in very good shape. They are genetically gifted, without a doubt.
Would they perform better and be even more durable if they lost 20 to 40 pounds of fat? Probably. But I doubt that either factor would get a lot better. And trying to lose a lot of fat without losing muscle mass is no easy thing.
Would they perform better and be even more durable if they lost 20 to 40 pounds of fat? Probably. But I doubt that either factor would get a lot better. And trying to lose a lot of fat without losing muscle mass is no easy thing.
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
I remember a story that John Kruk told on Letterman. He was outside a hotel smoking a cigarette and a lady was giving him crap for being an athlete and smoking. Kruk replied to her barbs by saying, " I ain't an athlete ma'am, I'm a baseball player."
Did you see that ludicrous display last night?
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
Quite strong Cole. Quite strong.
Did you see that ludicrous display last night?
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
Bryce Harper is good at baseball. Two HRs today. Strasburg is pretty good too.
Bandwagon fan of the 2023 STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS!
- MaxWebster
- The Big Lebowski
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 4:07 pm
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
up for the 3rd time now....
- MaxWebster
- The Big Lebowski
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 4:07 pm
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
flew to left. he sucks.
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
Nolasco is pitching a gem to players not named Bryce Harper.
Pack a vest for your james in the city of intercourse
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
There are many empty seats at the Cubs-Pirates game, but I guess the threat of snow might discourage some people from attending.
Wait, Luis Valbuena has a MLB job? Damn, the Cubs must be horrendously awful.
ETA: And Brent Lillibridge? Hahahahahahahahaha ... Cubs.
Wait, Luis Valbuena has a MLB job? Damn, the Cubs must be horrendously awful.
ETA: And Brent Lillibridge? Hahahahahahahahaha ... Cubs.
THERE’S NOWT WRONG WITH GALA LUNCHEONS, LAD!
- Steve of phpBB
- The Dude
- Posts: 8624
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:44 am
- Location: Feeling gravity's pull
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
They are.Sabo wrote:Wait, Luis Valbuena has a MLB job? Damn, the Cubs must be horrendously awful.
But they are 1-0!
And his one problem is he didn’t go to Russia that night because he had extracurricular activities, and they froze to death.
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
Through the top of the 3rd inning, it's Travis Hafner 4, the Cleveland Indians 3.
THERE’S NOWT WRONG WITH GALA LUNCHEONS, LAD!
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
Justin Upton, again.
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
roy halladay: still not healed.
in 4 innings he allowed 7 runs on 6 hits, 3 walks, 1 hit batter, and 1 wild pitch but had three k's.
his era is north of 14.
and it's not a cold night in philly. unless you count the phillies bat rack so far.
in 4 innings he allowed 7 runs on 6 hits, 3 walks, 1 hit batter, and 1 wild pitch but had three k's.
his era is north of 14.
and it's not a cold night in philly. unless you count the phillies bat rack so far.
Wade Boggs Carpet World Wade Boggs Carpet World Wade Boggs Carpet World Wade Boggs Carpet World Wade Boggs Carpet World
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
You wonder how many more starts he'd have if not for some of those wasted bullets late in 5 run games.
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
Wow. This makes Angel Hernandez look slightly better after his WBC strike call.
THERE’S NOWT WRONG WITH GALA LUNCHEONS, LAD!
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
Yeah, it's bad. I can't get too worked up about this, though, since the ump owned up to it afterwards. Hernandez would have insisted that he got it right and thrown 3 people out of today's game just to prove it.
- govmentchedda
- The Dude
- Posts: 12835
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 4:36 pm
Re: The 2013 MLB thread - March/April edition
That makes two losses that are at least partially because the Rays got fucked by the umps this year. But who's counting?
Until everything is less insane, I'm mixing weed with wine.