Roe v Wade

Okay . . . let's try this again.

Moderators: Shirley, Sabo, brian, rass, DaveInSeattle

User avatar
degenerasian
The Dude
Posts: 12371
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:22 pm

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by degenerasian »

Nonlinear FC wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:06 pm
govmentchedda wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 1:16 pm Blue wave coming. Book it.
I said this when the majority opinion was "leaked" and feel so even more today. When you combine this decision with what the J6 (and eventually the DoJ uncovers and reports/indicts... The usual malaise that keeps the "ruling party" at home in midterms is not only nullified, it's going to massively increase turnout.

Young voters are pissed, and that's a huge block that tends to stay home in midterm elections.
If there isn't a blue wave this time, there never will be. All the pieces are there.

Or is this a team that can get close the championship but can't finish? Blow it all up and let AOC lead the new team?
Kung Fu movies are like porn. There's 1 on 1, then 2 on 1, then a group scene..
User avatar
The Sybian
The Dude
Posts: 19052
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:36 am
Location: Working in the Crap Part of Jersey

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by The Sybian »

Nonlinear FC wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:06 pm
govmentchedda wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 1:16 pm Blue wave coming. Book it.
I said this when the majority opinion was "leaked" and feel so even more today. When you combine this decision with what the J6 (and eventually the DoJ uncovers and reports/indicts... The usual malaise that keeps the "ruling party" at home in midterms is not only nullified, it's going to massively increase turnout.

Young voters are pissed, and that's a huge block that tends to stay home in midterm elections.
I was viewing this take as overly optimistic, but when I saw a link to Dave Portnoy going on Twitter and ranting that we need to vote for incompetent moron Dems to protect our Rights from Republicans...maybe there is something to it? I thought he was an alt-Right hero. Hell, Gym Jordan brought him up to Goodell in the NFL hearings this week. I can't stand the guy, but I found this strangely uplifting.


An honest to God cult of personality - formed around a failed steak salesman.
-Pruitt
Johnnie
The Dude
Posts: 16893
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:31 pm
Location: TUCSON, BITCH!

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by Johnnie »

Call me a cynic, but the New Mexico State Supreme Court had to intervene in confirming the Republican *primary* winner in Otero County because of conspiracy theory bullshit.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/new-me ... 022-06-15/

So I see that being our norm in November if a Democrat wins in a particular area whether it's close or not.
mister d wrote:Couldn't have pegged me better.
EnochRoot wrote:I mean, whatever. Johnnie's all hot cuz I ride him.
User avatar
The Sybian
The Dude
Posts: 19052
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:36 am
Location: Working in the Crap Part of Jersey

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by The Sybian »

degenerasian wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:10 pm
Nonlinear FC wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:06 pm
govmentchedda wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 1:16 pm Blue wave coming. Book it.
I said this when the majority opinion was "leaked" and feel so even more today. When you combine this decision with what the J6 (and eventually the DoJ uncovers and reports/indicts... The usual malaise that keeps the "ruling party" at home in midterms is not only nullified, it's going to massively increase turnout.

Young voters are pissed, and that's a huge block that tends to stay home in midterm elections.
If there isn't a blue wave this time, there never will be. All the pieces are there.

Or is this a team that can get close the championship but can't finish? Blow it all up and let AOC lead the new team?
OTOH, all the pieces are in place for a Red Wave. Horrible inflation, Party holding Presidency almost always loses seats in the House and Senate, wildly unpopular President, Party leadership is villainized by the GOP and hated even more by the vocal wing of the Party... I think this energizes the Right and turns off a lot of Dem voters because they see the Party in power with major losses to the minority Party. Sure, the Right controls the Court, and the Dems don't have a large enough majority to accomplish anything in the face of an obstructionist minority Party, but as we can see from Mister D's posts, most people think the Dems should be able to do whatever they want since they have a majority, but until the filibuster is eliminated, 41 obstructionist Senators can block everything.
An honest to God cult of personality - formed around a failed steak salesman.
-Pruitt
User avatar
The Sybian
The Dude
Posts: 19052
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:36 am
Location: Working in the Crap Part of Jersey

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by The Sybian »

Johnnie wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:14 pm Call me a cynic, but the New Mexico State Supreme Court had to intervene in confirming the Republican *primary* winner in Otero County because of conspiracy theory bullshit.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/new-me ... 022-06-15/

So I see that being our norm in November if a Democrat wins in a particular area whether it's close or not.
Yes, and what scares me is all the money the GOP is spending on Big Lie candidates running for election boards, State AGs and other positions that control state and local elections. They can easily steal elections if they get in.
An honest to God cult of personality - formed around a failed steak salesman.
-Pruitt
Johnnie
The Dude
Posts: 16893
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:31 pm
Location: TUCSON, BITCH!

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by Johnnie »

"HiStORy WiLl NoT Be KiNd To RePuBLiCaNs."

- Democrats who fail to understand who writes history.
mister d wrote:Couldn't have pegged me better.
EnochRoot wrote:I mean, whatever. Johnnie's all hot cuz I ride him.
User avatar
The Sybian
The Dude
Posts: 19052
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:36 am
Location: Working in the Crap Part of Jersey

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by The Sybian »

Johnnie wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:37 pm "HiStORy WiLl NoT Be KiNd To RePuBLiCaNs."

- Democrats who fail to understand who writes history.
Regardless of who wins in the short term, I think history will not be kind to today's Republicans, but they won't give a fuck because they are playing for power and money today. Can anyone say they think Ted Cruz gives a fuck about his legacy? He will say and do absolutely anything to be President. He has no shame and will double down on anything, no matter how bad it looks, if it will get him a vote.

(I'm not convinced Cruz isn't an alien pretending to be human)
An honest to God cult of personality - formed around a failed steak salesman.
-Pruitt
User avatar
Rush2112
The Dude
Posts: 7319
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 4:35 pm
Location: Cyrus X-1
Contact:

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by Rush2112 »

govmentchedda wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 1:16 pm Blue wave coming. Book it.
I always thought that the GOP playbook was going to be to eat away at Roe v. Wade enough that Texas and the like could pass their basically banning abortion laws but keeping RvW so that they had that single-issue voter firmly in their pocket. Are there enough extra single-issue voters on the other side to cause a wave?

Polls seem to indicate that a majority of people support the right to an abortion, but is that enough to vote for a (perceived or actual) do-nothing Congressman?
Did you see that ludicrous display last night?
User avatar
pruitt2
Jesus Quintana
Posts: 993
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2021 6:57 pm

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by pruitt2 »

Johnnie wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:37 pm "HiStORy WiLl NoT Be KiNd To RePuBLiCaNs."

- Democrats who fail to understand who writes history.
Brilliant.

My million dollar idea is to create a modern Underground Railroad for women who are seeking abortions. Going to be a lot of happy clinic owners in Mexico, that's for sure.
From the north coast of Lake Ontario
User avatar
sancarlos
The Dude
Posts: 18344
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:46 pm
Location: NorCal via Colorado

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by sancarlos »

Nonlinear FC wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:06 pm
govmentchedda wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 1:16 pm Blue wave coming. Book it.
I said this when the majority opinion was "leaked" and feel so even more today. When you combine this decision with what the J6 (and eventually the DoJ uncovers and reports/indicts... The usual malaise that keeps the "ruling party" at home in midterms is not only nullified, it's going to massively increase turnout.

Young voters are pissed, and that's a huge block that tends to stay home in midterm elections.
But..but… Gas prices!…Inflation!…Stock market!…Your guns!…

I wish I was as optimistic as you guys.
"What a bunch of pedantic pricks." - sybian
User avatar
pruitt2
Jesus Quintana
Posts: 993
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2021 6:57 pm

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by pruitt2 »

sancarlos wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 4:08 pm
Nonlinear FC wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:06 pm
govmentchedda wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 1:16 pm Blue wave coming. Book it.
I said this when the majority opinion was "leaked" and feel so even more today. When you combine this decision with what the J6 (and eventually the DoJ uncovers and reports/indicts... The usual malaise that keeps the "ruling party" at home in midterms is not only nullified, it's going to massively increase turnout.

Young voters are pissed, and that's a huge block that tends to stay home in midterm elections.
But..but… Gas prices!…Inflation!…Stock market!…Your guns!…

I wish I was as optimistic as you guys.
It really is the gerrymandering and the electoral college that keeps these assholes in positions of power.
From the north coast of Lake Ontario
User avatar
mister d
The Dude
Posts: 29380
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 8:15 am

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by mister d »

Rush2112 wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:53 pmI always thought that the GOP playbook was going to be to eat away at Roe v. Wade enough that Texas and the like could pass their basically banning abortion laws but keeping RvW so that they had that single-issue voter firmly in their pocket.
Which either means they’ve lost the plot or they believe they’ve insulated themselves from backlash one way or another.
Johnnie wrote: Sat Sep 10, 2022 8:13 pmOh shit, you just reminded me about toilet paper.
User avatar
degenerasian
The Dude
Posts: 12371
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:22 pm

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by degenerasian »

mister d wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 5:05 pm
Rush2112 wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:53 pmI always thought that the GOP playbook was going to be to eat away at Roe v. Wade enough that Texas and the like could pass their basically banning abortion laws but keeping RvW so that they had that single-issue voter firmly in their pocket.
Which either means they’ve lost the plot or they believe they’ve insulated themselves from backlash one way or another.
Or they know the Democrats won't do anything about it. Judging by the speeches and actions so far, they might be right.
Kung Fu movies are like porn. There's 1 on 1, then 2 on 1, then a group scene..
User avatar
The Sybian
The Dude
Posts: 19052
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:36 am
Location: Working in the Crap Part of Jersey

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by The Sybian »

degenerasian wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 5:21 pm
mister d wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 5:05 pm
Rush2112 wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:53 pmI always thought that the GOP playbook was going to be to eat away at Roe v. Wade enough that Texas and the like could pass their basically banning abortion laws but keeping RvW so that they had that single-issue voter firmly in their pocket.
Which either means they’ve lost the plot or they believe they’ve insulated themselves from backlash one way or another.
Or they know the Democrats won't do anything about it. Judging by the speeches and actions so far, they might be right.
Unless they win more seats, the Dems can't do anything right now. I don't understand what you think the Dems could or should do. The House could possibly send a Bill to the Senate codifying Rowe, and the Republicans in the Senate would refuse to vote on it. Beyond that, what can they do? I think abstaining from singing on the steps of the Capitol would have been advisable, but there is nothing they can do. The only way around this is winning 60 seats, or enough Dem Senators to kill the filibuster and retaining the House.
An honest to God cult of personality - formed around a failed steak salesman.
-Pruitt
User avatar
degenerasian
The Dude
Posts: 12371
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:22 pm

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by degenerasian »

The Sybian wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 5:34 pm
degenerasian wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 5:21 pm
mister d wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 5:05 pm
Rush2112 wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:53 pmI always thought that the GOP playbook was going to be to eat away at Roe v. Wade enough that Texas and the like could pass their basically banning abortion laws but keeping RvW so that they had that single-issue voter firmly in their pocket.
Which either means they’ve lost the plot or they believe they’ve insulated themselves from backlash one way or another.
Or they know the Democrats won't do anything about it. Judging by the speeches and actions so far, they might be right.
Unless they win more seats, the Dems can't do anything right now. I don't understand what you think the Dems could or should do. The House could possibly send a Bill to the Senate codifying Rowe, and the Republicans in the Senate would refuse to vote on it. Beyond that, what can they do? I think abstaining from singing on the steps of the Capitol would have been advisable, but there is nothing they can do. The only way around this is winning 60 seats, or enough Dem Senators to kill the filibuster and retaining the House.
That's right. Keep sending bills to the senate, get Republican senators on the record rejecting it, put it on the news. It's all about messaging.. GOP has been doing it 40 years.
Kung Fu movies are like porn. There's 1 on 1, then 2 on 1, then a group scene..
User avatar
DSafetyGuy
The Dude
Posts: 8813
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 12:29 pm
Location: Behind the high school

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by DSafetyGuy »

The Sybian wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:13 pmI was viewing this take as overly optimistic, but when I saw a link to Dave Portnoy going on Twitter and ranting that we need to vote for incompetent moron Dems to protect our Rights from Republicans...maybe there is something to it? I thought he was an alt-Right hero. Hell, Gym Jordan brought him up to Goodell in the NFL hearings this week. I can't stand the guy, but I found this strangely uplifting.
Can't imagine why someone like him would want women to have access to abortions.
“All I'm sayin' is, he comes near me, I'll put him in the wall.”
Johnnie
The Dude
Posts: 16893
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:31 pm
Location: TUCSON, BITCH!

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by Johnnie »

mister d wrote:Couldn't have pegged me better.
EnochRoot wrote:I mean, whatever. Johnnie's all hot cuz I ride him.
User avatar
The Sybian
The Dude
Posts: 19052
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:36 am
Location: Working in the Crap Part of Jersey

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by The Sybian »

DSafetyGuy wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 7:20 pm
The Sybian wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:13 pmI was viewing this take as overly optimistic, but when I saw a link to Dave Portnoy going on Twitter and ranting that we need to vote for incompetent moron Dems to protect our Rights from Republicans...maybe there is something to it? I thought he was an alt-Right hero. Hell, Gym Jordan brought him up to Goodell in the NFL hearings this week. I can't stand the guy, but I found this strangely uplifting.
Can't imagine why someone like him would want women to have access to abortions.
I'm picturing a large glass bowl by his front door filled with slips of paper with his Planned Parenthood account number so girls can grab one on the way out as they leave, crying with mascara running down their face.
An honest to God cult of personality - formed around a failed steak salesman.
-Pruitt
User avatar
The Sybian
The Dude
Posts: 19052
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:36 am
Location: Working in the Crap Part of Jersey

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by The Sybian »

degenerasian wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 5:21 pm
mister d wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 5:05 pm
Rush2112 wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:53 pmI always thought that the GOP playbook was going to be to eat away at Roe v. Wade enough that Texas and the like could pass their basically banning abortion laws but keeping RvW so that they had that single-issue voter firmly in their pocket.
Which either means they’ve lost the plot or they believe they’ve insulated themselves from backlash one way or another.
Or they know the Democrats won't do anything about it. Judging by the speeches and actions so far, they might be right.
Great, so they waste time drafting and voting on Bills that will never get passed and everyone kills them for ignoring all of the myriad of problems they should be addressing.
An honest to God cult of personality - formed around a failed steak salesman.
-Pruitt
User avatar
mister d
The Dude
Posts: 29380
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 8:15 am

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by mister d »

… which they also aren’t addressing under the cover of “what can they actually do!” and over and over …
Johnnie wrote: Sat Sep 10, 2022 8:13 pmOh shit, you just reminded me about toilet paper.
Johnnie
The Dude
Posts: 16893
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:31 pm
Location: TUCSON, BITCH!

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by Johnnie »

God Bless America.
mister d wrote:Couldn't have pegged me better.
EnochRoot wrote:I mean, whatever. Johnnie's all hot cuz I ride him.
User avatar
The Sybian
The Dude
Posts: 19052
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:36 am
Location: Working in the Crap Part of Jersey

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by The Sybian »

mister d wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 8:24 pm … which they also aren’t addressing under the cover of “what can they actually do!” and over and over …
What they need to do is publicize the Bills they draft that would have broad appeal (like limiting the oil companies from extortionary profits) that the GOP refuse to vote for. They put that Bill in front of the Senate, the GOP votes against it, and somehow the GOP win the day because most people blame Biden and Dems for high gas prices. Biden weakly blaming it on Russia wasn't convincing anyone. It's just astounding how bad the Dems are at pushing media narratives and how the GOP frame every issue and pin the blame for all problems on Dems. And when that doesn't work, the Right invents a new culture war or invasion of immigrants to scare the sheep into hating the Dems. I think replacing Pelosi and Shumer is the first step, because let's get real, who is motivated by anything they say?
An honest to God cult of personality - formed around a failed steak salesman.
-Pruitt
User avatar
mister d
The Dude
Posts: 29380
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 8:15 am

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by mister d »

Corporate donors.
Johnnie wrote: Sat Sep 10, 2022 8:13 pmOh shit, you just reminded me about toilet paper.
User avatar
degenerasian
The Dude
Posts: 12371
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:22 pm

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by degenerasian »

From an Alberta point of view, it's hard to blame Russia for high oil prices when the first thing you did in office (day 1) was cancelling Keystone XL and banning all American new oil and gas leases. For what? A green new deal? And now he has to go to the Saudis?
Kung Fu movies are like porn. There's 1 on 1, then 2 on 1, then a group scene..
User avatar
sancarlos
The Dude
Posts: 18344
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:46 pm
Location: NorCal via Colorado

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by sancarlos »

degenerasian wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 9:26 pm From an Alberta point of view, it's hard to blame Russia for high oil prices when the first thing you did in office (day 1) was cancelling Keystone XL and banning all American new oil and gas leases. For what? A green new deal? And now he has to go to the Saudis?
The green new deal never came close to becoming law.
There are over 9,000 approved, unused oil leases available for drilling. LINK
Crude oil prices were higher in 2008, but oil company profits were much lower. LINK LINK
"What a bunch of pedantic pricks." - sybian
Johnnie
The Dude
Posts: 16893
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:31 pm
Location: TUCSON, BITCH!

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by Johnnie »

Please point me to the study that that pipeline would've conclusively and empirically reduced gas prices.

Oil companies are not reducing the price because they've been burned before and aren't giving a fuck. Gasoline has demand inelasticity. They're taking advantage.

Remember when oil barrels went negative at the beginning of the pandemic and gas was $1.60 a gallon because no one was going anywhere?

C'mon, man.
mister d wrote:Couldn't have pegged me better.
EnochRoot wrote:I mean, whatever. Johnnie's all hot cuz I ride him.
User avatar
The Sybian
The Dude
Posts: 19052
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:36 am
Location: Working in the Crap Part of Jersey

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by The Sybian »

degenerasian wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 9:26 pm From an Alberta point of view, it's hard to blame Russia for high oil prices when the first thing you did in office (day 1) was cancelling Keystone XL and banning all American new oil and gas leases. For what? A green new deal? And now he has to go to the Saudis?
Blaming it on Keystone is infuriating for so many reasons. The oil that would have gone through the pipeline isn’t suitable for gasoline, the oil is still shipped, but by train. There are over 9000 unused drilling leases on public land, yet oil companies are choosing not to drill. And even if Biden did grant a new drilling lease, it’d take 5 years for that oil to hit the market as gasoline. And Biden’s lease moratorium is only on public land, new wells can be dug on private land. But sure, fucking blame Biden for all of that.

I don’t mean to yell at you, I’m just sick of hearing this argument because it’s GOP lies that have become common wisdom. The truth is, oil companies are unnecessarily jacking up prices and it’s pure profit, and the GOP voted down a law to prevent this, because they want to fuck over Americans and blame Biden rather than do their fucking job and help the people they are supposed to fucking serve! And then they say, “see, government doesn’t work, so we should privatize everything and hand it over to my donors who will hire me at 100x a normal rate when I leave office.”
An honest to God cult of personality - formed around a failed steak salesman.
-Pruitt
User avatar
degenerasian
The Dude
Posts: 12371
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:22 pm

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by degenerasian »

I said it was from an Alberta point of view. We lost out. We lost a 1.5 billion dollar gamble.
Kung Fu movies are like porn. There's 1 on 1, then 2 on 1, then a group scene..
User avatar
pruitt2
Jesus Quintana
Posts: 993
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2021 6:57 pm

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by pruitt2 »

supreme court.jpeg
supreme court.jpeg (47.42 KiB) Viewed 270 times
From the north coast of Lake Ontario
HaulCitgo
Walter Sobchak
Posts: 4559
Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:07 pm

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by HaulCitgo »

About to read me some legal opinion. Coffee and donuts. Almost as good as an actual newspaper. Somehow this is all you do in school and nothing you do in practice. Gonna start with Mr. Thomas concurring opinion. Pretty sick outcome but on first glance legally not far off. Fwiw law school theory acknowledges substantive due process is legal fiction. Let's see in a hour or two.
HaulCitgo
Walter Sobchak
Posts: 4559
Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:07 pm

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by HaulCitgo »

10 mins in and all I can think is why do finance lawyers need a law license?
Gunpowder
The Dude
Posts: 8583
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:52 am
Location: Dipshitville, FL
Contact:

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by Gunpowder »

The Sybian wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 10:04 pm
degenerasian wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 9:26 pm From an Alberta point of view, it's hard to blame Russia for high oil prices when the first thing you did in office (day 1) was cancelling Keystone XL and banning all American new oil and gas leases. For what? A green new deal? And now he has to go to the Saudis?
Blaming it on Keystone is infuriating for so many reasons. The oil that would have gone through the pipeline isn’t suitable for gasoline, the oil is still shipped, but by train. There are over 9000 unused drilling leases on public land, yet oil companies are choosing not to drill. And even if Biden did grant a new drilling lease, it’d take 5 years for that oil to hit the market as gasoline. And Biden’s lease moratorium is only on public land, new wells can be dug on private land. But sure, fucking blame Biden for all of that.

I don’t mean to yell at you, I’m just sick of hearing this argument because it’s GOP lies that have become common wisdom. The truth is, oil companies are unnecessarily jacking up prices and it’s pure profit, and the GOP voted down a law to prevent this, because they want to fuck over Americans and blame Biden rather than do their fucking job and help the people they are supposed to fucking serve! And then they say, “see, government doesn’t work, so we should privatize everything and hand it over to my donors who will hire me at 100x a normal rate when I leave office.”

Yeah I don't understand why people think oil companies would "drill more!" to dilute their own market. The US exports more oil than it imports.
Pack a vest for your james in the city of intercourse
User avatar
sancarlos
The Dude
Posts: 18344
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:46 pm
Location: NorCal via Colorado

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by sancarlos »

"What a bunch of pedantic pricks." - sybian
Gunpowder
The Dude
Posts: 8583
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:52 am
Location: Dipshitville, FL
Contact:

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by Gunpowder »

Eventually the only "freedoms" we'll have left are the freedom to have light, plastic straws and old lightbulbs.
Pack a vest for your james in the city of intercourse
User avatar
degenerasian
The Dude
Posts: 12371
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:22 pm

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by degenerasian »

Gunpowder wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 10:54 am Eventually the only "freedoms" we'll have left are the freedom to have light, plastic straws and old lightbulbs.
Guns! You forgot guns!
Kung Fu movies are like porn. There's 1 on 1, then 2 on 1, then a group scene..
HaulCitgo
Walter Sobchak
Posts: 4559
Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:07 pm

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by HaulCitgo »

With you but at least the word arms is actually used...
User avatar
sancarlos
The Dude
Posts: 18344
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:46 pm
Location: NorCal via Colorado

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by sancarlos »

"What a bunch of pedantic pricks." - sybian
User avatar
A_B
The Dude
Posts: 23526
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:36 am
Location: Getting them boards like a wolf in the chicken pen.

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by A_B »

You know what you need? A lyrical sucker punch to the face.
User avatar
Reaper
Jesus Quintana
Posts: 878
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 8:08 pm

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by Reaper »

As per usual, the Onion is winning.

Image
How do you all get your death notices since I left?
User avatar
The Sybian
The Dude
Posts: 19052
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:36 am
Location: Working in the Crap Part of Jersey

Re: Roe v Wade

Post by The Sybian »

sancarlos wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 3:45 pm
I think his point is Brown overturned Plessy, so if Obama doesn’t think the Court can overturn precedence, we would still have Plessy (separate but equal, allowing segregation). What Cornyn misses is that the Dobb’s Court overturned a case to take away rights, which has never happened before.
An honest to God cult of personality - formed around a failed steak salesman.
-Pruitt
Post Reply