I like it, but I still think the Pelican is an odd choice. Sure, it's a bird that eats fish, but it's not that fierce. I guess a Raven isn't that predatory either.
Until everything is less insane, I'm mixing weed with wine.
govmentchedda wrote:I like it, but I still think the Pelican is an odd choice. Sure, it's a bird that eats fish, but it's not that fierce. I guess a Raven isn't that predatory either.
I like the originality of the name. I don't think it sounds good, but maybe I'll get used to it. They did a good job with the logo though. They made it look cool without trying to hard to make a stupid mean bird.
Shirley wrote:I like the originality of the name. I don't think it sounds good, but maybe I'll get used to it. They did a good job with the logo though. They made it look cool without trying to hard to make a stupid mean bird.
Yeah, there's a good chance that in 10 years everyone will just forget that this ever happened and think New Orleans Pelicans is normal.
Pack a vest for your james in the city of intercourse
Newspapers may like this. If a player has trouble with his shorts, I'm sure the headline writers will take note of the Pelican Briefs. If the team does poorly, it may get noted as the Pelican Grief. The head coach may be termed the Pelican Chief. A win to end a losing streak will be Pelican Relief.
On the one hand, the big problem is that a 3 syllable nickname is inherently problematic, unless... it provides an easy way to turn it into a one syllable thing you can shout (Hurricanes, on first blush, is terrible, but you can just say 'Canes and it's now OK.)
Let's go Pels! Nope.
That said, I love pelicans. Watching them fly in formation and dive bomb for fish is one of my favorite day dreamy thing to do when I visit the beach.
And I don't buy the idea that every mascot/nickname needs to be fierce to be successful or appropriate. Other than whatever the Ukrainians are churning out, most would not consider dolphins to be vicious creatures. But that's probably one of the more natural sounding team names in all of sports.
You can lead a horse to fish, but you can't fish out a horse.
Seen worse. It's a shame they can't get "Jazz" back, given that is was as appropriate a name as a town could ever have for one of its teams. Shame that Utah didn't change to something that made sense to Utah; Jazz doesn't.
Anyway, you don't have to look any further than the NBA to find sillier names.
The first pro team in New Orleans was called the Hurricanes. Can't use that. The first ABA team in New Orleans was the Buccaneers; bit of a conflict there with Tampa, I suppose.
At least they didn't go with "New Orleans Pride" or "New Orleans Humidity".
Nonlinear FC wrote:On the one hand, the big problem is that a 3 syllable nickname is inherently problematic, unless... it provides an easy way to turn it into a one syllable thing you can shout (Hurricanes, on first blush, is terrible, but you can just say 'Canes and it's now OK.)
govmentchedda wrote:I like it, but I still think the Pelican is an odd choice. Sure, it's a bird that eats fish, but it's not that fierce. I guess a Raven isn't that predatory either.
Nor are Cardinals, Blue Jays, etc., etc., etc.
When was the last time an American team was named for a non-fierce animal, or at least an animal that didn't sound fierce?
The Cardinals and Orioles names are a hundred years old.
The Blue Jays are from the 1970s, but that is Canada.
The Dolphins?
Are marlins supposed to be fierce? Rays? Devil Rays sounds fierce to me.
"He swore fluently, obscenely, and without repeating himself for just over a minute."
Mick Herron, "Down Cemetery Road"
Scottie wrote:At least they didn't go with "New Orleans Pride" or "New Orleans Humidity".
I always thought the Miami hockey team should have been called the Florida Humidity, to go along with the NBA Miami Heat. Then fans could have said, "You think the Heat is bad, the Humidity is even worse."
yes, I stole that from somebody... can't remember who...
govmentchedda wrote:I like it, but I still think the Pelican is an odd choice. Sure, it's a bird that eats fish, but it's not that fierce. I guess a Raven isn't that predatory either.
Nor are Cardinals, Blue Jays, etc., etc., etc.
When was the last time an American team was named for a non-fierce animal, or at least an animal that didn't sound fierce?
The Cardinals and Orioles names are a hundred years old.
The Blue Jays are from the 1970s, but that is Canada.
The Dolphins?
Are marlins supposed to be fierce? Rays? Devil Rays sounds fierce to me.
The Marlins?
EDIT: Just saw you noted them. Marlins ain't fierce just because they have a knife on their faces.
Last edited by Gunpowder on Thu Apr 18, 2013 12:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Pack a vest for your james in the city of intercourse
It fits the city better than Pacers do for Indy. I love the team and always will but why name it after something in horse racing. I know they say it is to tie into the city's racing history but it still makes no sense to me. Although I am not sure what else they should have called them at inception.
To quote both Bruce Prichard and Tony Schiavone, "Fuck Duff Meltzer."
govmentchedda wrote:I like it, but I still think the Pelican is an odd choice. Sure, it's a bird that eats fish, but it's not that fierce. I guess a Raven isn't that predatory either.
Nor are Cardinals, Blue Jays, etc., etc., etc.
When was the last time an American team was named for a non-fierce animal, or at least an animal that didn't sound fierce?
The Cardinals and Orioles names are a hundred years old.
The Blue Jays are from the 1970s, but that is Canada.
The Dolphins?
Are marlins supposed to be fierce? Rays? Devil Rays sounds fierce to me.
The Atlanta Thrashers were named for the Georgia state bird, the brown thrasher.
Which is not fierce at all. Fortunately, the Thrashers played like their namesake.
From 1887-1961, the New Orleans minor league team was called the Pelicans. I love using the retro minor league name. Shoeless Joe Jackson is in the below photo.